Cargando…
Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Pain and depression are associated, but it is uncertain if effective pain relief during labor by labor analgesia reduces the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD). This randomized, controlled study assessed whether combined spinal-epidural (CSE) labor analgesia is associated with a de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447189 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_814_19 |
_version_ | 1783634745639305216 |
---|---|
author | Kaur, Amrit Mitra, Sukanya Singh, Jasveer Sarna, Rashi Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur Saroa, Richa Das, Subhash |
author_facet | Kaur, Amrit Mitra, Sukanya Singh, Jasveer Sarna, Rashi Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur Saroa, Richa Das, Subhash |
author_sort | Kaur, Amrit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pain and depression are associated, but it is uncertain if effective pain relief during labor by labor analgesia reduces the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD). This randomized, controlled study assessed whether combined spinal-epidural (CSE) labor analgesia is associated with a decreased risk of PPD. Other reported risk factors for PPD were also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parturients were randomly assigned to either CSE labor analgesia or normal vaginal delivery (n = 65 each). CSE parturients received 0.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally and PCEA with continuous infusion of 0.1% levobupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl @5 ml/h along with patient-controlled boluses with a lockout interval of 15 min. Parturients of both the groups were assessed using Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for depressive symptoms at day 3 and PPD at 6 weeks (primary outcome; defined as EPDS score ≥10 at 6 weeks postpartum). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. Parturients were also screened for several risk factors for PPD. RESULTS: Incidence of PPD was 22.3%. The difference in incidence of PPD between the CSE group vs. control group was not significant (27.7% vs. 16.9%; Fisher's exact P = 0.103). Of all the risk factors analyzed in logistic regression model, perceived stress during pregnancy was the only significant predictor of the development of PPD (adjusted Odds Ratio 11.17, 95% Confidence interval 2.86–43.55; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CSE analgesia in laboring parturients does not reduce PPD at 6 weeks. Instead, perceived high stress during pregnancy appears to be the most important factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7796742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77967422021-01-13 Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial Kaur, Amrit Mitra, Sukanya Singh, Jasveer Sarna, Rashi Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur Saroa, Richa Das, Subhash Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Pain and depression are associated, but it is uncertain if effective pain relief during labor by labor analgesia reduces the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD). This randomized, controlled study assessed whether combined spinal-epidural (CSE) labor analgesia is associated with a decreased risk of PPD. Other reported risk factors for PPD were also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parturients were randomly assigned to either CSE labor analgesia or normal vaginal delivery (n = 65 each). CSE parturients received 0.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally and PCEA with continuous infusion of 0.1% levobupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl @5 ml/h along with patient-controlled boluses with a lockout interval of 15 min. Parturients of both the groups were assessed using Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for depressive symptoms at day 3 and PPD at 6 weeks (primary outcome; defined as EPDS score ≥10 at 6 weeks postpartum). Secondary outcomes included pain scores, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. Parturients were also screened for several risk factors for PPD. RESULTS: Incidence of PPD was 22.3%. The difference in incidence of PPD between the CSE group vs. control group was not significant (27.7% vs. 16.9%; Fisher's exact P = 0.103). Of all the risk factors analyzed in logistic regression model, perceived stress during pregnancy was the only significant predictor of the development of PPD (adjusted Odds Ratio 11.17, 95% Confidence interval 2.86–43.55; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CSE analgesia in laboring parturients does not reduce PPD at 6 weeks. Instead, perceived high stress during pregnancy appears to be the most important factor. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7796742/ /pubmed/33447189 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_814_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Saudi Journal of Anesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaur, Amrit Mitra, Sukanya Singh, Jasveer Sarna, Rashi Pandher, Dilpreet Kaur Saroa, Richa Das, Subhash Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial |
title | Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: Revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | pain, stress, analgesia and postpartum depression: revisiting the controversy with a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447189 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_814_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kauramrit painstressanalgesiaandpostpartumdepressionrevisitingthecontroversywitharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mitrasukanya painstressanalgesiaandpostpartumdepressionrevisitingthecontroversywitharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT singhjasveer painstressanalgesiaandpostpartumdepressionrevisitingthecontroversywitharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sarnarashi painstressanalgesiaandpostpartumdepressionrevisitingthecontroversywitharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pandherdilpreetkaur painstressanalgesiaandpostpartumdepressionrevisitingthecontroversywitharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT saroaricha painstressanalgesiaandpostpartumdepressionrevisitingthecontroversywitharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dassubhash painstressanalgesiaandpostpartumdepressionrevisitingthecontroversywitharandomizedcontrolledtrial |