Cargando…
A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing
BACKGROUND: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a sequential approach of parent-targeted HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based Motivation Interviewing (MI). METHODS: In 2016, we selected all 11- to 12-year-old boys and girls seen in one clinic whose vaccine records did not include the H...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10132-6 |
_version_ | 1783634799449079808 |
---|---|
author | Staras, Stephanie A. S. Richardson, Eric Merlo, Lisa J. Bian, Jiang Thompson, Lindsay A. Krieger, Janice L. Gurka, Matthew J. Sanders, Ashley H. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. |
author_facet | Staras, Stephanie A. S. Richardson, Eric Merlo, Lisa J. Bian, Jiang Thompson, Lindsay A. Krieger, Janice L. Gurka, Matthew J. Sanders, Ashley H. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. |
author_sort | Staras, Stephanie A. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a sequential approach of parent-targeted HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based Motivation Interviewing (MI). METHODS: In 2016, we selected all 11- to 12-year-old boys and girls seen in one clinic whose vaccine records did not include the HPV vaccine (n=286). By gender, we individually randomized parents of adolescents to an interactive text message (74 girls and 45 boys), postcard reminder (46 boys and no girls because of previously demonstrated efficacy), or standard care group (75 girls and 46 boys). Reminders were sent with medical director permission and a HIPAA waiver. Two months after reminders, among the adolescents whose vaccine records still did not include the HPV vaccine, we selected a gender-stratified random sample of 20 parents for phone-based MI. We assessed the percentage of deliverable messages, the percentage of parents’ responding to the interactive text message, parent acceptability of receiving a text message, and MI parent responsiveness and interviewer competence (MI Treatment Integrity Coding system). RESULTS: Nearly all messages were deliverable (98% of postcards and 74% of text messages). Six of the 88 parents (7%) receiving text messages scheduled an appointment through our interactive system. The acceptability survey response rate was 37% (38/102). Respondents were favorable toward vaccine reminders for all parents (82%). Among 20 sampled parents, 17 were reached by phone of whom 7 completed MI, 4 had or were getting the HPV vaccine for their child, and 5 expressed disinterest. Across the 7 MI calls, the interviewer was rated 100% MI adherent and scored an average 4.19 rating for Global Spirit. CONCLUSION: Without providing explicit consent to receive vaccine-related messages, parents nonetheless found postcards and interactive text messages acceptable. Centralizing MI to phone calls with trained staff was acceptable to parents and resulted in highly MI-adherent interviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-10132-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7797089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77970892021-01-11 A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing Staras, Stephanie A. S. Richardson, Eric Merlo, Lisa J. Bian, Jiang Thompson, Lindsay A. Krieger, Janice L. Gurka, Matthew J. Sanders, Ashley H. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a sequential approach of parent-targeted HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based Motivation Interviewing (MI). METHODS: In 2016, we selected all 11- to 12-year-old boys and girls seen in one clinic whose vaccine records did not include the HPV vaccine (n=286). By gender, we individually randomized parents of adolescents to an interactive text message (74 girls and 45 boys), postcard reminder (46 boys and no girls because of previously demonstrated efficacy), or standard care group (75 girls and 46 boys). Reminders were sent with medical director permission and a HIPAA waiver. Two months after reminders, among the adolescents whose vaccine records still did not include the HPV vaccine, we selected a gender-stratified random sample of 20 parents for phone-based MI. We assessed the percentage of deliverable messages, the percentage of parents’ responding to the interactive text message, parent acceptability of receiving a text message, and MI parent responsiveness and interviewer competence (MI Treatment Integrity Coding system). RESULTS: Nearly all messages were deliverable (98% of postcards and 74% of text messages). Six of the 88 parents (7%) receiving text messages scheduled an appointment through our interactive system. The acceptability survey response rate was 37% (38/102). Respondents were favorable toward vaccine reminders for all parents (82%). Among 20 sampled parents, 17 were reached by phone of whom 7 completed MI, 4 had or were getting the HPV vaccine for their child, and 5 expressed disinterest. Across the 7 MI calls, the interviewer was rated 100% MI adherent and scored an average 4.19 rating for Global Spirit. CONCLUSION: Without providing explicit consent to receive vaccine-related messages, parents nonetheless found postcards and interactive text messages acceptable. Centralizing MI to phone calls with trained staff was acceptable to parents and resulted in highly MI-adherent interviews. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-10132-6. BioMed Central 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7797089/ /pubmed/33422047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10132-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Staras, Stephanie A. S. Richardson, Eric Merlo, Lisa J. Bian, Jiang Thompson, Lindsay A. Krieger, Janice L. Gurka, Matthew J. Sanders, Ashley H. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing |
title | A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing |
title_full | A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing |
title_fullStr | A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing |
title_full_unstemmed | A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing |
title_short | A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing |
title_sort | feasibility trial of parent hpv vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10132-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT starasstephanieas afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT richardsoneric afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT merlolisaj afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT bianjiang afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT thompsonlindsaya afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT kriegerjanicel afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT gurkamatthewj afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT sandersashleyh afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT shenkmanelizabetha afeasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT starasstephanieas feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT richardsoneric feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT merlolisaj feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT bianjiang feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT thompsonlindsaya feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT kriegerjanicel feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT gurkamatthewj feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT sandersashleyh feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing AT shenkmanelizabetha feasibilitytrialofparenthpvvaccineremindersandphonebasedmotivationalinterviewing |