Cargando…

Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design

BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are among the most common long bone injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. To date, musculoskeletal complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) and compromised fracture healing following fracture fixation of these injuries are still pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metsemakers, Willem-Jan, Kortram, Kirsten, Ferreira, Nando, Morgenstern, Mario, Joeris, Alexander, Pape, Hans-Christoph, Kammerlander, Christian, Konda, Sanjit, Oh, Jong-Keon, Giannoudis, Peter V., Egol, Kenneth A., Obremskey, William T., Verhofstad, Michael H. J., Raschke, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x
_version_ 1783634800164208640
author Metsemakers, Willem-Jan
Kortram, Kirsten
Ferreira, Nando
Morgenstern, Mario
Joeris, Alexander
Pape, Hans-Christoph
Kammerlander, Christian
Konda, Sanjit
Oh, Jong-Keon
Giannoudis, Peter V.
Egol, Kenneth A.
Obremskey, William T.
Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
Raschke, Michael
author_facet Metsemakers, Willem-Jan
Kortram, Kirsten
Ferreira, Nando
Morgenstern, Mario
Joeris, Alexander
Pape, Hans-Christoph
Kammerlander, Christian
Konda, Sanjit
Oh, Jong-Keon
Giannoudis, Peter V.
Egol, Kenneth A.
Obremskey, William T.
Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
Raschke, Michael
author_sort Metsemakers, Willem-Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are among the most common long bone injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. To date, musculoskeletal complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) and compromised fracture healing following fracture fixation of these injuries are still prevalent. The relatively high complication rates prove that, despite advances in modern fracture care, the management of TSFs remains a challenge even in the hands of experienced surgeons. Therefore, the Fracture-Related Outcome Study for operatively treated Tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.) aims at creating a registry that enables data mining to gather detailed information to support future clinical decision-making regarding the management of TSF’s. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicenter, observational registry for TSFs was recently developed. Recruitment started in 2019 and is planned to take 36 months, seeking to enroll a minimum of 1000 patients. The study protocol does not influence the clinical decision-making procedure, implant choice, or surgical/imaging techniques; these are being performed as per local hospital standard of care. Data collected in this registry include injury specifics, treatment details, clinical outcomes (e.g., FRI), patient-reported outcomes, and procedure- or implant-related adverse events. The minimum follow up is 12 months. DISCUSSION: Although over the past decades, multiple high-quality studies have addressed individual research questions related to the outcome of TSFs, knowledge gaps remain. The scarcity of data calls for an international high-quality, population-based registry. Creating such a database could optimize strategies intended to prevent severe musculoskeletal complications. The main purpose of the F.R.O.S.T registry is to evaluate the association between different treatment strategies and patient outcomes. It will address not only operative techniques and implant materials but also perioperative preventive measures. For the first time, data concerning systemic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the influence of local antimicrobials, and timing of soft-tissue coverage will be collected at an international level and correlated with standardized outcome measures in a large prospective, multicenter, observational registry for global accessibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03598530. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7797092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77970922021-01-11 Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design Metsemakers, Willem-Jan Kortram, Kirsten Ferreira, Nando Morgenstern, Mario Joeris, Alexander Pape, Hans-Christoph Kammerlander, Christian Konda, Sanjit Oh, Jong-Keon Giannoudis, Peter V. Egol, Kenneth A. Obremskey, William T. Verhofstad, Michael H. J. Raschke, Michael BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are among the most common long bone injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. To date, musculoskeletal complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) and compromised fracture healing following fracture fixation of these injuries are still prevalent. The relatively high complication rates prove that, despite advances in modern fracture care, the management of TSFs remains a challenge even in the hands of experienced surgeons. Therefore, the Fracture-Related Outcome Study for operatively treated Tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.) aims at creating a registry that enables data mining to gather detailed information to support future clinical decision-making regarding the management of TSF’s. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicenter, observational registry for TSFs was recently developed. Recruitment started in 2019 and is planned to take 36 months, seeking to enroll a minimum of 1000 patients. The study protocol does not influence the clinical decision-making procedure, implant choice, or surgical/imaging techniques; these are being performed as per local hospital standard of care. Data collected in this registry include injury specifics, treatment details, clinical outcomes (e.g., FRI), patient-reported outcomes, and procedure- or implant-related adverse events. The minimum follow up is 12 months. DISCUSSION: Although over the past decades, multiple high-quality studies have addressed individual research questions related to the outcome of TSFs, knowledge gaps remain. The scarcity of data calls for an international high-quality, population-based registry. Creating such a database could optimize strategies intended to prevent severe musculoskeletal complications. The main purpose of the F.R.O.S.T registry is to evaluate the association between different treatment strategies and patient outcomes. It will address not only operative techniques and implant materials but also perioperative preventive measures. For the first time, data concerning systemic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the influence of local antimicrobials, and timing of soft-tissue coverage will be collected at an international level and correlated with standardized outcome measures in a large prospective, multicenter, observational registry for global accessibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03598530. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x. BioMed Central 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7797092/ /pubmed/33422025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Metsemakers, Willem-Jan
Kortram, Kirsten
Ferreira, Nando
Morgenstern, Mario
Joeris, Alexander
Pape, Hans-Christoph
Kammerlander, Christian
Konda, Sanjit
Oh, Jong-Keon
Giannoudis, Peter V.
Egol, Kenneth A.
Obremskey, William T.
Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
Raschke, Michael
Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design
title Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design
title_full Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design
title_fullStr Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design
title_full_unstemmed Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design
title_short Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design
title_sort fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (f.r.o.s.t.): registry rationale and design
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x
work_keys_str_mv AT metsemakerswillemjan fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT kortramkirsten fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT ferreiranando fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT morgensternmario fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT joerisalexander fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT papehanschristoph fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT kammerlanderchristian fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT kondasanjit fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT ohjongkeon fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT giannoudispeterv fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT egolkennetha fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT obremskeywilliamt fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT verhofstadmichaelhj fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT raschkemichael fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign
AT fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign