Cargando…
Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design
BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are among the most common long bone injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. To date, musculoskeletal complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) and compromised fracture healing following fracture fixation of these injuries are still pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x |
_version_ | 1783634800164208640 |
---|---|
author | Metsemakers, Willem-Jan Kortram, Kirsten Ferreira, Nando Morgenstern, Mario Joeris, Alexander Pape, Hans-Christoph Kammerlander, Christian Konda, Sanjit Oh, Jong-Keon Giannoudis, Peter V. Egol, Kenneth A. Obremskey, William T. Verhofstad, Michael H. J. Raschke, Michael |
author_facet | Metsemakers, Willem-Jan Kortram, Kirsten Ferreira, Nando Morgenstern, Mario Joeris, Alexander Pape, Hans-Christoph Kammerlander, Christian Konda, Sanjit Oh, Jong-Keon Giannoudis, Peter V. Egol, Kenneth A. Obremskey, William T. Verhofstad, Michael H. J. Raschke, Michael |
author_sort | Metsemakers, Willem-Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are among the most common long bone injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. To date, musculoskeletal complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) and compromised fracture healing following fracture fixation of these injuries are still prevalent. The relatively high complication rates prove that, despite advances in modern fracture care, the management of TSFs remains a challenge even in the hands of experienced surgeons. Therefore, the Fracture-Related Outcome Study for operatively treated Tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.) aims at creating a registry that enables data mining to gather detailed information to support future clinical decision-making regarding the management of TSF’s. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicenter, observational registry for TSFs was recently developed. Recruitment started in 2019 and is planned to take 36 months, seeking to enroll a minimum of 1000 patients. The study protocol does not influence the clinical decision-making procedure, implant choice, or surgical/imaging techniques; these are being performed as per local hospital standard of care. Data collected in this registry include injury specifics, treatment details, clinical outcomes (e.g., FRI), patient-reported outcomes, and procedure- or implant-related adverse events. The minimum follow up is 12 months. DISCUSSION: Although over the past decades, multiple high-quality studies have addressed individual research questions related to the outcome of TSFs, knowledge gaps remain. The scarcity of data calls for an international high-quality, population-based registry. Creating such a database could optimize strategies intended to prevent severe musculoskeletal complications. The main purpose of the F.R.O.S.T registry is to evaluate the association between different treatment strategies and patient outcomes. It will address not only operative techniques and implant materials but also perioperative preventive measures. For the first time, data concerning systemic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the influence of local antimicrobials, and timing of soft-tissue coverage will be collected at an international level and correlated with standardized outcome measures in a large prospective, multicenter, observational registry for global accessibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03598530. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7797092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77970922021-01-11 Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design Metsemakers, Willem-Jan Kortram, Kirsten Ferreira, Nando Morgenstern, Mario Joeris, Alexander Pape, Hans-Christoph Kammerlander, Christian Konda, Sanjit Oh, Jong-Keon Giannoudis, Peter V. Egol, Kenneth A. Obremskey, William T. Verhofstad, Michael H. J. Raschke, Michael BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are among the most common long bone injuries often resulting from high-energy trauma. To date, musculoskeletal complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI) and compromised fracture healing following fracture fixation of these injuries are still prevalent. The relatively high complication rates prove that, despite advances in modern fracture care, the management of TSFs remains a challenge even in the hands of experienced surgeons. Therefore, the Fracture-Related Outcome Study for operatively treated Tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.) aims at creating a registry that enables data mining to gather detailed information to support future clinical decision-making regarding the management of TSF’s. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicenter, observational registry for TSFs was recently developed. Recruitment started in 2019 and is planned to take 36 months, seeking to enroll a minimum of 1000 patients. The study protocol does not influence the clinical decision-making procedure, implant choice, or surgical/imaging techniques; these are being performed as per local hospital standard of care. Data collected in this registry include injury specifics, treatment details, clinical outcomes (e.g., FRI), patient-reported outcomes, and procedure- or implant-related adverse events. The minimum follow up is 12 months. DISCUSSION: Although over the past decades, multiple high-quality studies have addressed individual research questions related to the outcome of TSFs, knowledge gaps remain. The scarcity of data calls for an international high-quality, population-based registry. Creating such a database could optimize strategies intended to prevent severe musculoskeletal complications. The main purpose of the F.R.O.S.T registry is to evaluate the association between different treatment strategies and patient outcomes. It will address not only operative techniques and implant materials but also perioperative preventive measures. For the first time, data concerning systemic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the influence of local antimicrobials, and timing of soft-tissue coverage will be collected at an international level and correlated with standardized outcome measures in a large prospective, multicenter, observational registry for global accessibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03598530. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x. BioMed Central 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7797092/ /pubmed/33422025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Metsemakers, Willem-Jan Kortram, Kirsten Ferreira, Nando Morgenstern, Mario Joeris, Alexander Pape, Hans-Christoph Kammerlander, Christian Konda, Sanjit Oh, Jong-Keon Giannoudis, Peter V. Egol, Kenneth A. Obremskey, William T. Verhofstad, Michael H. J. Raschke, Michael Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design |
title | Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design |
title_full | Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design |
title_fullStr | Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design |
title_full_unstemmed | Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design |
title_short | Fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (F.R.O.S.T.): registry rationale and design |
title_sort | fracture-related outcome study for operatively treated tibia shaft fractures (f.r.o.s.t.): registry rationale and design |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03930-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metsemakerswillemjan fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT kortramkirsten fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT ferreiranando fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT morgensternmario fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT joerisalexander fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT papehanschristoph fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT kammerlanderchristian fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT kondasanjit fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT ohjongkeon fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT giannoudispeterv fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT egolkennetha fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT obremskeywilliamt fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT verhofstadmichaelhj fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT raschkemichael fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign AT fracturerelatedoutcomestudyforoperativelytreatedtibiashaftfracturesfrostregistryrationaleanddesign |