Cargando…

Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?

BACKGROUND: Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is defined by slow gait speed combined with subjective cognitive complaint. MCR is a predementia syndrome, similar to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, there is currently no study comparing the differences in cognitive performance and physica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Fang-Yu, Chang, Yuanmay, Cheng, Shih-Jung, Shaw, Jin-Siang, Lee, Chuo-Yu, Chen, Pei-Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33421996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01992-z
_version_ 1783634802152308736
author Cheng, Fang-Yu
Chang, Yuanmay
Cheng, Shih-Jung
Shaw, Jin-Siang
Lee, Chuo-Yu
Chen, Pei-Hao
author_facet Cheng, Fang-Yu
Chang, Yuanmay
Cheng, Shih-Jung
Shaw, Jin-Siang
Lee, Chuo-Yu
Chen, Pei-Hao
author_sort Cheng, Fang-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is defined by slow gait speed combined with subjective cognitive complaint. MCR is a predementia syndrome, similar to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, there is currently no study comparing the differences in cognitive performance and physical function between these two types of cognitive impairment. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare cognitive performance and physical function in individuals with MCR versus MCI. METHODS: A total of 77 participants, free of dementia, were recruited from the neurological outpatient clinic of a medical center in Taiwan. Participants were separated into 2 groups, MCR (n = 33) and MCI (n = 44) groups, based on definition criteria from previous studies. The priority was to assign a diagnosis of MCR first, followed by MCI. Hence, “pure” MCI had no overlap with MCR syndrome. Cognitive performance, including executive function, attention, working memory, episode memory, visuospatial function, and language, were measured. Physical functions such as activities in daily living, the Tinetti Assessment Scale, and the Timed Up and Go test were also measured. RESULTS: Executive function, attention, working memory, episodic memory and language were all significantly lower in the MCR group than the MCI group. Abilities related to physical function, including those measured by the Tinetti Assessment Scale and the Timed Up and Go test, were significantly lower in the MCR group than the MCI group. CONCLUSIONS: We noted that cognitive performance and physical function were lower in MCR individuals than MCI but without MCR syndrome. However, the conclusions were based on the enrollment procedure of participants prioritizes the MCR syndrome. Because of the overlap of MCR and MCI, future studies should use different enrollment strategies to further clarify the status of these two populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7797100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77971002021-01-11 Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment? Cheng, Fang-Yu Chang, Yuanmay Cheng, Shih-Jung Shaw, Jin-Siang Lee, Chuo-Yu Chen, Pei-Hao BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is defined by slow gait speed combined with subjective cognitive complaint. MCR is a predementia syndrome, similar to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, there is currently no study comparing the differences in cognitive performance and physical function between these two types of cognitive impairment. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare cognitive performance and physical function in individuals with MCR versus MCI. METHODS: A total of 77 participants, free of dementia, were recruited from the neurological outpatient clinic of a medical center in Taiwan. Participants were separated into 2 groups, MCR (n = 33) and MCI (n = 44) groups, based on definition criteria from previous studies. The priority was to assign a diagnosis of MCR first, followed by MCI. Hence, “pure” MCI had no overlap with MCR syndrome. Cognitive performance, including executive function, attention, working memory, episode memory, visuospatial function, and language, were measured. Physical functions such as activities in daily living, the Tinetti Assessment Scale, and the Timed Up and Go test were also measured. RESULTS: Executive function, attention, working memory, episodic memory and language were all significantly lower in the MCR group than the MCI group. Abilities related to physical function, including those measured by the Tinetti Assessment Scale and the Timed Up and Go test, were significantly lower in the MCR group than the MCI group. CONCLUSIONS: We noted that cognitive performance and physical function were lower in MCR individuals than MCI but without MCR syndrome. However, the conclusions were based on the enrollment procedure of participants prioritizes the MCR syndrome. Because of the overlap of MCR and MCI, future studies should use different enrollment strategies to further clarify the status of these two populations. BioMed Central 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7797100/ /pubmed/33421996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01992-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheng, Fang-Yu
Chang, Yuanmay
Cheng, Shih-Jung
Shaw, Jin-Siang
Lee, Chuo-Yu
Chen, Pei-Hao
Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
title Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
title_full Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
title_fullStr Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
title_full_unstemmed Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
title_short Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
title_sort do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33421996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01992-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chengfangyu docognitiveperformanceandphysicalfunctiondifferbetweenindividualswithmotoriccognitiverisksyndromeandthosewithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT changyuanmay docognitiveperformanceandphysicalfunctiondifferbetweenindividualswithmotoriccognitiverisksyndromeandthosewithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT chengshihjung docognitiveperformanceandphysicalfunctiondifferbetweenindividualswithmotoriccognitiverisksyndromeandthosewithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT shawjinsiang docognitiveperformanceandphysicalfunctiondifferbetweenindividualswithmotoriccognitiverisksyndromeandthosewithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT leechuoyu docognitiveperformanceandphysicalfunctiondifferbetweenindividualswithmotoriccognitiverisksyndromeandthosewithmildcognitiveimpairment
AT chenpeihao docognitiveperformanceandphysicalfunctiondifferbetweenindividualswithmotoriccognitiverisksyndromeandthosewithmildcognitiveimpairment