Cargando…
Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Rodent models of liver resection have been used to investigate and evaluate the liver’s complex physiology and pathology since 1931. First documented by Higgins and Anderson, such models were created to understand liver regeneration mechanisms to improve outcomes in patients undergoing e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00478-3 |
_version_ | 1783634811797110784 |
---|---|
author | Kamali, Can Kamali, Kaan Brunnbauer, Philipp Splith, Katrin Pratschke, Johann Schmelzle, Moritz Krenzien, Felix |
author_facet | Kamali, Can Kamali, Kaan Brunnbauer, Philipp Splith, Katrin Pratschke, Johann Schmelzle, Moritz Krenzien, Felix |
author_sort | Kamali, Can |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rodent models of liver resection have been used to investigate and evaluate the liver’s complex physiology and pathology since 1931. First documented by Higgins and Anderson, such models were created to understand liver regeneration mechanisms to improve outcomes in patients undergoing extensive liver resection for liver cancer or other underlying liver diseases. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using Pubmed, gathering publications up to January 2019, which engaged with the mouse model of extended liver resection as a method itself. The results of this search were filtered according to their language, novelty, and relevancy. RESULTS: The Boolean search found 3741 articles on Pubmed, with 3130 publications remaining when filtered by language and the presence of a full text. In total, 21 of these publications examined the key themes of the animal model described. The mortality varied from 0 to 50% depending on the surgeon's experience and the resection method. The liver resection was mainly performed with classic sutures (14 out of 21 publications) and isoflurane was used for anaesthesia (10 out of 21 publications) in combination with analgesics (buprenorphine or ketamine/xylazine). The most used mouse strain was C57BL/6 (7 of 21 publications) which was on average 11 weeks old with a weight of 23 g. CONCLUSION: Through the overview, laid out in the selected publications, this paper reviews the shift of the extended liver resection model from rat to the mouse, describes the state of the art in the experimental setting, and discusses the possible limitations and pitfalls. Clearly, the extended liver resection in mice is a reproducible, practical and easy to learn method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7797144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77971442021-01-11 Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review Kamali, Can Kamali, Kaan Brunnbauer, Philipp Splith, Katrin Pratschke, Johann Schmelzle, Moritz Krenzien, Felix Eur J Med Res Review BACKGROUND: Rodent models of liver resection have been used to investigate and evaluate the liver’s complex physiology and pathology since 1931. First documented by Higgins and Anderson, such models were created to understand liver regeneration mechanisms to improve outcomes in patients undergoing extensive liver resection for liver cancer or other underlying liver diseases. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using Pubmed, gathering publications up to January 2019, which engaged with the mouse model of extended liver resection as a method itself. The results of this search were filtered according to their language, novelty, and relevancy. RESULTS: The Boolean search found 3741 articles on Pubmed, with 3130 publications remaining when filtered by language and the presence of a full text. In total, 21 of these publications examined the key themes of the animal model described. The mortality varied from 0 to 50% depending on the surgeon's experience and the resection method. The liver resection was mainly performed with classic sutures (14 out of 21 publications) and isoflurane was used for anaesthesia (10 out of 21 publications) in combination with analgesics (buprenorphine or ketamine/xylazine). The most used mouse strain was C57BL/6 (7 of 21 publications) which was on average 11 weeks old with a weight of 23 g. CONCLUSION: Through the overview, laid out in the selected publications, this paper reviews the shift of the extended liver resection model from rat to the mouse, describes the state of the art in the experimental setting, and discusses the possible limitations and pitfalls. Clearly, the extended liver resection in mice is a reproducible, practical and easy to learn method. BioMed Central 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7797144/ /pubmed/33422147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00478-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Kamali, Can Kamali, Kaan Brunnbauer, Philipp Splith, Katrin Pratschke, Johann Schmelzle, Moritz Krenzien, Felix Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review |
title | Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review |
title_full | Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review |
title_short | Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review |
title_sort | extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00478-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamalican extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview AT kamalikaan extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview AT brunnbauerphilipp extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview AT splithkatrin extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview AT pratschkejohann extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview AT schmelzlemoritz extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview AT krenzienfelix extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview |