Cargando…

Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Rodent models of liver resection have been used to investigate and evaluate the liver’s complex physiology and pathology since 1931. First documented by Higgins and Anderson, such models were created to understand liver regeneration mechanisms to improve outcomes in patients undergoing e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamali, Can, Kamali, Kaan, Brunnbauer, Philipp, Splith, Katrin, Pratschke, Johann, Schmelzle, Moritz, Krenzien, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00478-3
_version_ 1783634811797110784
author Kamali, Can
Kamali, Kaan
Brunnbauer, Philipp
Splith, Katrin
Pratschke, Johann
Schmelzle, Moritz
Krenzien, Felix
author_facet Kamali, Can
Kamali, Kaan
Brunnbauer, Philipp
Splith, Katrin
Pratschke, Johann
Schmelzle, Moritz
Krenzien, Felix
author_sort Kamali, Can
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rodent models of liver resection have been used to investigate and evaluate the liver’s complex physiology and pathology since 1931. First documented by Higgins and Anderson, such models were created to understand liver regeneration mechanisms to improve outcomes in patients undergoing extensive liver resection for liver cancer or other underlying liver diseases. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using Pubmed, gathering publications up to January 2019, which engaged with the mouse model of extended liver resection as a method itself. The results of this search were filtered according to their language, novelty, and relevancy. RESULTS: The Boolean search found 3741 articles on Pubmed, with 3130 publications remaining when filtered by language and the presence of a full text. In total, 21 of these publications examined the key themes of the animal model described. The mortality varied from 0 to 50% depending on the surgeon's experience and the resection method. The liver resection was mainly performed with classic sutures (14 out of 21 publications) and isoflurane was used for anaesthesia (10 out of 21 publications) in combination with analgesics (buprenorphine or ketamine/xylazine). The most used mouse strain was C57BL/6 (7 of 21 publications) which was on average 11 weeks old with a weight of 23 g. CONCLUSION: Through the overview, laid out in the selected publications, this paper reviews the shift of the extended liver resection model from rat to the mouse, describes the state of the art in the experimental setting, and discusses the possible limitations and pitfalls. Clearly, the extended liver resection in mice is a reproducible, practical and easy to learn method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7797144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77971442021-01-11 Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review Kamali, Can Kamali, Kaan Brunnbauer, Philipp Splith, Katrin Pratschke, Johann Schmelzle, Moritz Krenzien, Felix Eur J Med Res Review BACKGROUND: Rodent models of liver resection have been used to investigate and evaluate the liver’s complex physiology and pathology since 1931. First documented by Higgins and Anderson, such models were created to understand liver regeneration mechanisms to improve outcomes in patients undergoing extensive liver resection for liver cancer or other underlying liver diseases. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using Pubmed, gathering publications up to January 2019, which engaged with the mouse model of extended liver resection as a method itself. The results of this search were filtered according to their language, novelty, and relevancy. RESULTS: The Boolean search found 3741 articles on Pubmed, with 3130 publications remaining when filtered by language and the presence of a full text. In total, 21 of these publications examined the key themes of the animal model described. The mortality varied from 0 to 50% depending on the surgeon's experience and the resection method. The liver resection was mainly performed with classic sutures (14 out of 21 publications) and isoflurane was used for anaesthesia (10 out of 21 publications) in combination with analgesics (buprenorphine or ketamine/xylazine). The most used mouse strain was C57BL/6 (7 of 21 publications) which was on average 11 weeks old with a weight of 23 g. CONCLUSION: Through the overview, laid out in the selected publications, this paper reviews the shift of the extended liver resection model from rat to the mouse, describes the state of the art in the experimental setting, and discusses the possible limitations and pitfalls. Clearly, the extended liver resection in mice is a reproducible, practical and easy to learn method. BioMed Central 2021-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7797144/ /pubmed/33422147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00478-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Kamali, Can
Kamali, Kaan
Brunnbauer, Philipp
Splith, Katrin
Pratschke, Johann
Schmelzle, Moritz
Krenzien, Felix
Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
title Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
title_full Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
title_fullStr Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
title_short Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
title_sort extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00478-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kamalican extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview
AT kamalikaan extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview
AT brunnbauerphilipp extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview
AT splithkatrin extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview
AT pratschkejohann extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview
AT schmelzlemoritz extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview
AT krenzienfelix extendedliverresectioninmicestateoftheartandpitfallsasystematicreview