Cargando…

Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation?

BACKGROUND: Nonprescription sunglasses are available in bulk from authorized and unauthorized vendors. Sunglasses should follow the minimum requirements to sufficiently protect the eyes. In this study, we found that a significant proportion of nonprescription sunglasses available at authorized and u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alemu, Haile Woretaw, Adimassu, Nebiyat Feleke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442315
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S290249
_version_ 1783634847637438464
author Alemu, Haile Woretaw
Adimassu, Nebiyat Feleke
author_facet Alemu, Haile Woretaw
Adimassu, Nebiyat Feleke
author_sort Alemu, Haile Woretaw
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonprescription sunglasses are available in bulk from authorized and unauthorized vendors. Sunglasses should follow the minimum requirements to sufficiently protect the eyes. In this study, we found that a significant proportion of nonprescription sunglasses available at authorized and unauthorized sources were not protective of ultraviolet radiation. PURPOSE: Protection from harmful ultraviolet radiation with sunglasses minimizes or avoids ocular complications. In developing countries like Ethiopia, sunglasses are imported without regulation. Sunglasses are distributed to the market without regulatory tests for potential causes of ocular complications. The purpose of this study was to determine commercially available nonprescription sunglasses’ ultraviolet radiation protection level. METHODS: A total of 74 pairs of nonprescription sunglasses were collected from different parts of the country and tested for ultraviolet radiation protection using ultraviolet detector (anti-radiation UV sun detector, China) instrument. Brand, lens color and average of three readings of ultraviolet radiation protection were recorded. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection standard followed. Data were entered and analyzed by using SPSS version 20. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. RESULTS: Of the total 74 different pairs of nonprescription sunglasses, 47.3% (35) were obtained from authorized sources and 86.5% (p=0.23) were brand tagged. Only 73.0% (p=0.81) of nonprescription sunglasses were in accordance with the standards and protective to ultraviolet radiation, while the remaining 27.0% (p=0.59) were failed to block the harmful ultraviolet radiation. Upon one sample t-test, the mean ultraviolet radiation protection level of commercially available sunglasses was 392.77 (t-value= −7681.54, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant proportions of nonprescription sunglasses available from vendors were not protective of ultraviolet radiation and performed below the expected international standards. Reassurance is mandatory before dispensed to users irrespective of source.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7797341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77973412021-01-12 Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation? Alemu, Haile Woretaw Adimassu, Nebiyat Feleke Clin Optom (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: Nonprescription sunglasses are available in bulk from authorized and unauthorized vendors. Sunglasses should follow the minimum requirements to sufficiently protect the eyes. In this study, we found that a significant proportion of nonprescription sunglasses available at authorized and unauthorized sources were not protective of ultraviolet radiation. PURPOSE: Protection from harmful ultraviolet radiation with sunglasses minimizes or avoids ocular complications. In developing countries like Ethiopia, sunglasses are imported without regulation. Sunglasses are distributed to the market without regulatory tests for potential causes of ocular complications. The purpose of this study was to determine commercially available nonprescription sunglasses’ ultraviolet radiation protection level. METHODS: A total of 74 pairs of nonprescription sunglasses were collected from different parts of the country and tested for ultraviolet radiation protection using ultraviolet detector (anti-radiation UV sun detector, China) instrument. Brand, lens color and average of three readings of ultraviolet radiation protection were recorded. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection standard followed. Data were entered and analyzed by using SPSS version 20. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. RESULTS: Of the total 74 different pairs of nonprescription sunglasses, 47.3% (35) were obtained from authorized sources and 86.5% (p=0.23) were brand tagged. Only 73.0% (p=0.81) of nonprescription sunglasses were in accordance with the standards and protective to ultraviolet radiation, while the remaining 27.0% (p=0.59) were failed to block the harmful ultraviolet radiation. Upon one sample t-test, the mean ultraviolet radiation protection level of commercially available sunglasses was 392.77 (t-value= −7681.54, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant proportions of nonprescription sunglasses available from vendors were not protective of ultraviolet radiation and performed below the expected international standards. Reassurance is mandatory before dispensed to users irrespective of source. Dove 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7797341/ /pubmed/33442315 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S290249 Text en © 2021 Alemu and Adimassu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Alemu, Haile Woretaw
Adimassu, Nebiyat Feleke
Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation?
title Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation?
title_full Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation?
title_fullStr Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation?
title_full_unstemmed Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation?
title_short Are Nonprescription Sunglasses in Ethiopian Market Protective for Ultraviolet Radiation?
title_sort are nonprescription sunglasses in ethiopian market protective for ultraviolet radiation?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7797341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442315
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S290249
work_keys_str_mv AT alemuhaileworetaw arenonprescriptionsunglassesinethiopianmarketprotectiveforultravioletradiation
AT adimassunebiyatfeleke arenonprescriptionsunglassesinethiopianmarketprotectiveforultravioletradiation