Cargando…

Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis

The benefit of adjuvant hysterectomy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally-advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to systematically search the literature and perform a meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and diseas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Weijia, Lu, Canxiong, Yu, Zhiwu, Gao, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12421
_version_ 1783634992789716992
author Lu, Weijia
Lu, Canxiong
Yu, Zhiwu
Gao, Lei
author_facet Lu, Weijia
Lu, Canxiong
Yu, Zhiwu
Gao, Lei
author_sort Lu, Weijia
collection PubMed
description The benefit of adjuvant hysterectomy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally-advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to systematically search the literature and perform a meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients subjected to CCRT with hysterectomy and those who underwent CCRT alone. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Google scholar databases were searched. A meta-analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with meta-regression was performed for the following moderators: Disease stage, histology and proportion of radical hysterectomy. Data from 14 studies were included. The results indicated that patients who received CCRT with hysterectomy had significantly better OS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91; I(2)=19%; P=0.007) and DFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.93; I(2)=27%; P=0.01) than those treated with CCRT alone. However, in a subgroup analysis by study type, the results were significant only for retrospective studies but not for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, only 2 RCTs were included with small sample size, heterogeneity and low overall quality. Subgroup analyses based on the use of brachytherapy in the CCRT with hysterectomy group demonstrated no difference in OS and DFS between the two groups. Regarding the absolute numbers of death and recurrence events, no significant difference in mortality (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.33; I(2)=0%; P=0.64) was determined between the two groups, but a significantly reduced incidence of recurrence was observed in the CCRT with hysterectomy group (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79; I(2)=29%; P=0.0002). The meta-regression results point to a significant influence of the proportion of stage II patients on OS. Despite the overall analysis indicating improved OS and DFS with the use of adjuvant hysterectomy after CCRT, subgroup analysis based on similar treatment protocols failed to demonstrate any significant benefit of hysterectomy in LACC. However, the results indicated that the recurrence rate may be higher in patients undergoing CCRT without hysterectomy. The limited quality of the studies included and selection bias from retrospective studies restrict the possibility to draw strong conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7798101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77981012021-02-04 Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis Lu, Weijia Lu, Canxiong Yu, Zhiwu Gao, Lei Oncol Lett Articles The benefit of adjuvant hysterectomy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally-advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to systematically search the literature and perform a meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients subjected to CCRT with hysterectomy and those who underwent CCRT alone. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Google scholar databases were searched. A meta-analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with meta-regression was performed for the following moderators: Disease stage, histology and proportion of radical hysterectomy. Data from 14 studies were included. The results indicated that patients who received CCRT with hysterectomy had significantly better OS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.91; I(2)=19%; P=0.007) and DFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.93; I(2)=27%; P=0.01) than those treated with CCRT alone. However, in a subgroup analysis by study type, the results were significant only for retrospective studies but not for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, only 2 RCTs were included with small sample size, heterogeneity and low overall quality. Subgroup analyses based on the use of brachytherapy in the CCRT with hysterectomy group demonstrated no difference in OS and DFS between the two groups. Regarding the absolute numbers of death and recurrence events, no significant difference in mortality (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.33; I(2)=0%; P=0.64) was determined between the two groups, but a significantly reduced incidence of recurrence was observed in the CCRT with hysterectomy group (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79; I(2)=29%; P=0.0002). The meta-regression results point to a significant influence of the proportion of stage II patients on OS. Despite the overall analysis indicating improved OS and DFS with the use of adjuvant hysterectomy after CCRT, subgroup analysis based on similar treatment protocols failed to demonstrate any significant benefit of hysterectomy in LACC. However, the results indicated that the recurrence rate may be higher in patients undergoing CCRT without hysterectomy. The limited quality of the studies included and selection bias from retrospective studies restrict the possibility to draw strong conclusions. D.A. Spandidos 2021-02 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7798101/ /pubmed/33552278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12421 Text en Copyright: © Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Lu, Weijia
Lu, Canxiong
Yu, Zhiwu
Gao, Lei
Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis
title Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis
title_full Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis
title_fullStr Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis
title_short Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis
title_sort chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12421
work_keys_str_mv AT luweijia chemoradiotherapyalonevschemoradiotherapyandhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandupdatedmetaanalysis
AT lucanxiong chemoradiotherapyalonevschemoradiotherapyandhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandupdatedmetaanalysis
AT yuzhiwu chemoradiotherapyalonevschemoradiotherapyandhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandupdatedmetaanalysis
AT gaolei chemoradiotherapyalonevschemoradiotherapyandhysterectomyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandupdatedmetaanalysis