Cargando…

Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information

Pointwise mutual information (PMI) is a measure of association used in information theory. In this paper, PMI is used to characterize several publicly available databases (DrugBank, ChEMBL, PubChem and ZINC) in terms of association strength between compound structural features resulting in database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Čmelo, I., Voršilák, M., Svozil, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33423694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00483-y
_version_ 1783635019165597696
author Čmelo, I.
Voršilák, M.
Svozil, D.
author_facet Čmelo, I.
Voršilák, M.
Svozil, D.
author_sort Čmelo, I.
collection PubMed
description Pointwise mutual information (PMI) is a measure of association used in information theory. In this paper, PMI is used to characterize several publicly available databases (DrugBank, ChEMBL, PubChem and ZINC) in terms of association strength between compound structural features resulting in database PMI interrelation profiles. As structural features, substructure fragments obtained by coding individual compounds as MACCS, PubChemKey and ECFP fingerprints are used. The analysis of publicly available databases reveals, in accord with other studies, unusual properties of DrugBank compounds which further confirms the validity of PMI profiling approach. Z-standardized relative feature tightness (ZRFT), a PMI-derived measure that quantifies how well the given compound’s feature combinations fit these in a particular compound set, is applied for the analysis of compound synthetic accessibility (SA), as well as for the classification of compounds as easy (ES) and hard (HS) to synthesize. ZRFT value distributions are compared with these of SYBA and SAScore. The analysis of ZRFT values of structurally complex compounds in the SAVI database reveals oligopeptide structures that are mispredicted by SAScore as HS, while correctly predicted by ZRFT and SYBA as ES. Compared to SAScore, SYBA and random forest, ZRFT predictions are less accurate, though by a narrow margin (Acc(ZRFT) = 94.5%, Acc(SYBA) = 98.8%, Acc(SAScore) = 99.0%, Acc(RF) = 97.3%). However, ZRFT ability to distinguish between ES and HS compounds is surprisingly high considering that while SYBA, SAScore and random forest are dedicated SA models, ZRFT is a generic measurement that merely quantifies the strength of interrelations between structural feature pairs. The results presented in the current work indicate that structural feature co-occurrence, quantified by PMI or ZRFT, contains a significant amount of information relevant to physico-chemical properties of organic compounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7798221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77982212021-01-11 Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information Čmelo, I. Voršilák, M. Svozil, D. J Cheminform Methodology Pointwise mutual information (PMI) is a measure of association used in information theory. In this paper, PMI is used to characterize several publicly available databases (DrugBank, ChEMBL, PubChem and ZINC) in terms of association strength between compound structural features resulting in database PMI interrelation profiles. As structural features, substructure fragments obtained by coding individual compounds as MACCS, PubChemKey and ECFP fingerprints are used. The analysis of publicly available databases reveals, in accord with other studies, unusual properties of DrugBank compounds which further confirms the validity of PMI profiling approach. Z-standardized relative feature tightness (ZRFT), a PMI-derived measure that quantifies how well the given compound’s feature combinations fit these in a particular compound set, is applied for the analysis of compound synthetic accessibility (SA), as well as for the classification of compounds as easy (ES) and hard (HS) to synthesize. ZRFT value distributions are compared with these of SYBA and SAScore. The analysis of ZRFT values of structurally complex compounds in the SAVI database reveals oligopeptide structures that are mispredicted by SAScore as HS, while correctly predicted by ZRFT and SYBA as ES. Compared to SAScore, SYBA and random forest, ZRFT predictions are less accurate, though by a narrow margin (Acc(ZRFT) = 94.5%, Acc(SYBA) = 98.8%, Acc(SAScore) = 99.0%, Acc(RF) = 97.3%). However, ZRFT ability to distinguish between ES and HS compounds is surprisingly high considering that while SYBA, SAScore and random forest are dedicated SA models, ZRFT is a generic measurement that merely quantifies the strength of interrelations between structural feature pairs. The results presented in the current work indicate that structural feature co-occurrence, quantified by PMI or ZRFT, contains a significant amount of information relevant to physico-chemical properties of organic compounds. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7798221/ /pubmed/33423694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00483-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Čmelo, I.
Voršilák, M.
Svozil, D.
Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
title Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
title_full Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
title_fullStr Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
title_full_unstemmed Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
title_short Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
title_sort profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33423694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00483-y
work_keys_str_mv AT cmeloi profilingandanalysisofchemicalcompoundsusingpointwisemutualinformation
AT vorsilakm profilingandanalysisofchemicalcompoundsusingpointwisemutualinformation
AT svozild profilingandanalysisofchemicalcompoundsusingpointwisemutualinformation