Cargando…
Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information
Pointwise mutual information (PMI) is a measure of association used in information theory. In this paper, PMI is used to characterize several publicly available databases (DrugBank, ChEMBL, PubChem and ZINC) in terms of association strength between compound structural features resulting in database...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33423694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00483-y |
_version_ | 1783635019165597696 |
---|---|
author | Čmelo, I. Voršilák, M. Svozil, D. |
author_facet | Čmelo, I. Voršilák, M. Svozil, D. |
author_sort | Čmelo, I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pointwise mutual information (PMI) is a measure of association used in information theory. In this paper, PMI is used to characterize several publicly available databases (DrugBank, ChEMBL, PubChem and ZINC) in terms of association strength between compound structural features resulting in database PMI interrelation profiles. As structural features, substructure fragments obtained by coding individual compounds as MACCS, PubChemKey and ECFP fingerprints are used. The analysis of publicly available databases reveals, in accord with other studies, unusual properties of DrugBank compounds which further confirms the validity of PMI profiling approach. Z-standardized relative feature tightness (ZRFT), a PMI-derived measure that quantifies how well the given compound’s feature combinations fit these in a particular compound set, is applied for the analysis of compound synthetic accessibility (SA), as well as for the classification of compounds as easy (ES) and hard (HS) to synthesize. ZRFT value distributions are compared with these of SYBA and SAScore. The analysis of ZRFT values of structurally complex compounds in the SAVI database reveals oligopeptide structures that are mispredicted by SAScore as HS, while correctly predicted by ZRFT and SYBA as ES. Compared to SAScore, SYBA and random forest, ZRFT predictions are less accurate, though by a narrow margin (Acc(ZRFT) = 94.5%, Acc(SYBA) = 98.8%, Acc(SAScore) = 99.0%, Acc(RF) = 97.3%). However, ZRFT ability to distinguish between ES and HS compounds is surprisingly high considering that while SYBA, SAScore and random forest are dedicated SA models, ZRFT is a generic measurement that merely quantifies the strength of interrelations between structural feature pairs. The results presented in the current work indicate that structural feature co-occurrence, quantified by PMI or ZRFT, contains a significant amount of information relevant to physico-chemical properties of organic compounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7798221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77982212021-01-11 Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information Čmelo, I. Voršilák, M. Svozil, D. J Cheminform Methodology Pointwise mutual information (PMI) is a measure of association used in information theory. In this paper, PMI is used to characterize several publicly available databases (DrugBank, ChEMBL, PubChem and ZINC) in terms of association strength between compound structural features resulting in database PMI interrelation profiles. As structural features, substructure fragments obtained by coding individual compounds as MACCS, PubChemKey and ECFP fingerprints are used. The analysis of publicly available databases reveals, in accord with other studies, unusual properties of DrugBank compounds which further confirms the validity of PMI profiling approach. Z-standardized relative feature tightness (ZRFT), a PMI-derived measure that quantifies how well the given compound’s feature combinations fit these in a particular compound set, is applied for the analysis of compound synthetic accessibility (SA), as well as for the classification of compounds as easy (ES) and hard (HS) to synthesize. ZRFT value distributions are compared with these of SYBA and SAScore. The analysis of ZRFT values of structurally complex compounds in the SAVI database reveals oligopeptide structures that are mispredicted by SAScore as HS, while correctly predicted by ZRFT and SYBA as ES. Compared to SAScore, SYBA and random forest, ZRFT predictions are less accurate, though by a narrow margin (Acc(ZRFT) = 94.5%, Acc(SYBA) = 98.8%, Acc(SAScore) = 99.0%, Acc(RF) = 97.3%). However, ZRFT ability to distinguish between ES and HS compounds is surprisingly high considering that while SYBA, SAScore and random forest are dedicated SA models, ZRFT is a generic measurement that merely quantifies the strength of interrelations between structural feature pairs. The results presented in the current work indicate that structural feature co-occurrence, quantified by PMI or ZRFT, contains a significant amount of information relevant to physico-chemical properties of organic compounds. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7798221/ /pubmed/33423694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00483-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Čmelo, I. Voršilák, M. Svozil, D. Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information |
title | Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information |
title_full | Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information |
title_fullStr | Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information |
title_full_unstemmed | Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information |
title_short | Profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information |
title_sort | profiling and analysis of chemical compounds using pointwise mutual information |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33423694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00483-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cmeloi profilingandanalysisofchemicalcompoundsusingpointwisemutualinformation AT vorsilakm profilingandanalysisofchemicalcompoundsusingpointwisemutualinformation AT svozild profilingandanalysisofchemicalcompoundsusingpointwisemutualinformation |