Cargando…

The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the safety of early closure in diverting ileostomy with lower anterior rectal-cancer resection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 47 patients who underwent diverting ileostomy with lower rectal-cancer resection between May 2009 and October 2017....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukudome, Ian, Maeda, Hiromichi, Okamoto, Ken, Kuroiwa, Hajime, Yamaguchi, Sachi, Fujisawa, Kazune, Shiga, Mai, Dabanaka, Ken, Kobayashi, Michiya, Namikawa, Tsutomu, Hanazaki, Kazuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33423686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-020-00275-1
_version_ 1783635029201518592
author Fukudome, Ian
Maeda, Hiromichi
Okamoto, Ken
Kuroiwa, Hajime
Yamaguchi, Sachi
Fujisawa, Kazune
Shiga, Mai
Dabanaka, Ken
Kobayashi, Michiya
Namikawa, Tsutomu
Hanazaki, Kazuhiro
author_facet Fukudome, Ian
Maeda, Hiromichi
Okamoto, Ken
Kuroiwa, Hajime
Yamaguchi, Sachi
Fujisawa, Kazune
Shiga, Mai
Dabanaka, Ken
Kobayashi, Michiya
Namikawa, Tsutomu
Hanazaki, Kazuhiro
author_sort Fukudome, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the safety of early closure in diverting ileostomy with lower anterior rectal-cancer resection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 47 patients who underwent diverting ileostomy with lower rectal-cancer resection between May 2009 and October 2017. The results of the stoma closure were compared between patients who underwent stoma closure within 90 days (early closure [EC] group) and those who underwent late closure (LC group; closure after 90 days). Because of the small sample size, the frequency of severe complications post closure was analyzed. RESULTS: Among 47 patients, 29 were in the EC group. Postoperative complications occurred in 48.3% (14/29) and 27.8% (5/18) of patients in the EC and LC groups, respectively. This difference was due to minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification I/II), such as superficial incisional surgical site infections (n=5) in the EC group. The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ III) was similar between the groups (20.7% vs. 16.7%, p=1, Fisher’s exact test). CONCLUSIONS: No association was observed between the time of closure and development of major complications; however, there was an increased likelihood of minor complications after EC. This study provides a basis on which future treatment guidelines for early stoma closure may be developed without affecting patient quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7798274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77982742021-01-12 The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients Fukudome, Ian Maeda, Hiromichi Okamoto, Ken Kuroiwa, Hajime Yamaguchi, Sachi Fujisawa, Kazune Shiga, Mai Dabanaka, Ken Kobayashi, Michiya Namikawa, Tsutomu Hanazaki, Kazuhiro Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the safety of early closure in diverting ileostomy with lower anterior rectal-cancer resection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 47 patients who underwent diverting ileostomy with lower rectal-cancer resection between May 2009 and October 2017. The results of the stoma closure were compared between patients who underwent stoma closure within 90 days (early closure [EC] group) and those who underwent late closure (LC group; closure after 90 days). Because of the small sample size, the frequency of severe complications post closure was analyzed. RESULTS: Among 47 patients, 29 were in the EC group. Postoperative complications occurred in 48.3% (14/29) and 27.8% (5/18) of patients in the EC and LC groups, respectively. This difference was due to minor complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification I/II), such as superficial incisional surgical site infections (n=5) in the EC group. The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ III) was similar between the groups (20.7% vs. 16.7%, p=1, Fisher’s exact test). CONCLUSIONS: No association was observed between the time of closure and development of major complications; however, there was an increased likelihood of minor complications after EC. This study provides a basis on which future treatment guidelines for early stoma closure may be developed without affecting patient quality of life. BioMed Central 2021-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7798274/ /pubmed/33423686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-020-00275-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fukudome, Ian
Maeda, Hiromichi
Okamoto, Ken
Kuroiwa, Hajime
Yamaguchi, Sachi
Fujisawa, Kazune
Shiga, Mai
Dabanaka, Ken
Kobayashi, Michiya
Namikawa, Tsutomu
Hanazaki, Kazuhiro
The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
title The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
title_full The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
title_fullStr The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
title_full_unstemmed The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
title_short The safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
title_sort safety of early versus late ileostomy reversal after low anterior rectal resection: a retrospective study in 47 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33423686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-020-00275-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fukudomeian thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT maedahiromichi thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT okamotoken thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT kuroiwahajime thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT yamaguchisachi thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT fujisawakazune thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT shigamai thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT dabanakaken thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT kobayashimichiya thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT namikawatsutomu thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT hanazakikazuhiro thesafetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT fukudomeian safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT maedahiromichi safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT okamotoken safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT kuroiwahajime safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT yamaguchisachi safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT fujisawakazune safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT shigamai safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT dabanakaken safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT kobayashimichiya safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT namikawatsutomu safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients
AT hanazakikazuhiro safetyofearlyversuslateileostomyreversalafterlowanteriorrectalresectionaretrospectivestudyin47patients