Cargando…

Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers

OBJECTIVES: This observational, cross-sectional study based aimed to test whether heart failure (HF)-disease management program (DMP) components are influencing care and clinical decision-making in Brazil. METHODS: The survey respondents were cardiologists recommended by experts in the field and inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bocchi, Edimar Alcides, Moreira, Henrique Turin, Nakamuta, Juliana Sanajotti, Simões, Marcus Vinicius, Casas, Alberto de Almeida Las, da Costa, Altamiro Reis, de Assis, Amberson Vieira, Durães, André Rodrigues, Pereira-Barretto, Antonio Carlos, Ravessa, Antonio Delduque de Araujo, Macedo, Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli, Biselli, Bruno, Pinto, Carolina Maria Nogueira, Filho, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann, Costantini, Costantino Roberto, Almeida, Dirceu Rodrigues, dos Santos, Edval Gomes, Soliva, Erwin, Figueiredo, Estevão Lanna, de Albuquerque, Felipe Neves, Paulitsch, Felipe, Neuenschwander, Fernando Carvalho, de Figueiredo, José Albuquerque, Brito, Flavio de Souza, Lopes, Heno Ferreira, Villacorta, Humberto, de Souza, João David, Sepulveda, João Mariano, Ayoub, José Carlos Aidar, Vilela-Martin, José F., Cardoso, Juliano Novaes, Uemura, Laercio, Moura, Lidia Zytynski, Maia, Lilia Nigro, de Oliveira, Lucia Brandão, Maia, Lucimir, da Silva, Luís Beck, Gowdak, Luís Henrique Wolff, Danzmann, Luiz Claudio, Andrade, Marcus, Braile-Sternieri, Maria Christiane Valeria Braga, Moreira, Maria da Consolação Vieira, França, Olimpio R, Filho, Otavio Rizzi Coelho, Esteves, Paulo Frederico, Raupp-da-Rosa, Priscila, Silva, Ricardo Jorge de Queiroz e, Mourilhe-Rocha, Ricardo, Viégas, Ruy Felipe Melo, Rassi, Salvador, Mangili, Sandrigo, Kaiser, Sergio Emanuel, Martins, Silvia Marinho, Kawabata, Vitor Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33503176
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e1991
_version_ 1783635046301696000
author Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
Moreira, Henrique Turin
Nakamuta, Juliana Sanajotti
Simões, Marcus Vinicius
Casas, Alberto de Almeida Las
da Costa, Altamiro Reis
de Assis, Amberson Vieira
Durães, André Rodrigues
Pereira-Barretto, Antonio Carlos
Ravessa, Antonio Delduque de Araujo
Macedo, Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli
Biselli, Bruno
Pinto, Carolina Maria Nogueira
Filho, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann
Costantini, Costantino Roberto
Almeida, Dirceu Rodrigues
dos Santos, Edval Gomes
Soliva, Erwin
Figueiredo, Estevão Lanna
de Albuquerque, Felipe Neves
Paulitsch, Felipe
Neuenschwander, Fernando Carvalho
de Figueiredo, José Albuquerque
Brito, Flavio de Souza
Lopes, Heno Ferreira
Villacorta, Humberto
de Souza, João David
Sepulveda, João Mariano
Ayoub, José Carlos Aidar
Vilela-Martin, José F.
Cardoso, Juliano Novaes
Uemura, Laercio
Moura, Lidia Zytynski
Maia, Lilia Nigro
de Oliveira, Lucia Brandão
Maia, Lucimir
da Silva, Luís Beck
Gowdak, Luís Henrique Wolff
Danzmann, Luiz Claudio
Andrade, Marcus
Braile-Sternieri, Maria Christiane Valeria Braga
Moreira, Maria da Consolação Vieira
França, Olimpio R
Filho, Otavio Rizzi Coelho
Esteves, Paulo Frederico
Raupp-da-Rosa, Priscila
Silva, Ricardo Jorge de Queiroz e
Mourilhe-Rocha, Ricardo
Viégas, Ruy Felipe Melo
Rassi, Salvador
Mangili, Sandrigo
Kaiser, Sergio Emanuel
Martins, Silvia Marinho
Kawabata, Vitor Sergio
author_facet Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
Moreira, Henrique Turin
Nakamuta, Juliana Sanajotti
Simões, Marcus Vinicius
Casas, Alberto de Almeida Las
da Costa, Altamiro Reis
de Assis, Amberson Vieira
Durães, André Rodrigues
Pereira-Barretto, Antonio Carlos
Ravessa, Antonio Delduque de Araujo
Macedo, Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli
Biselli, Bruno
Pinto, Carolina Maria Nogueira
Filho, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann
Costantini, Costantino Roberto
Almeida, Dirceu Rodrigues
dos Santos, Edval Gomes
Soliva, Erwin
Figueiredo, Estevão Lanna
de Albuquerque, Felipe Neves
Paulitsch, Felipe
Neuenschwander, Fernando Carvalho
de Figueiredo, José Albuquerque
Brito, Flavio de Souza
Lopes, Heno Ferreira
Villacorta, Humberto
de Souza, João David
Sepulveda, João Mariano
Ayoub, José Carlos Aidar
Vilela-Martin, José F.
Cardoso, Juliano Novaes
Uemura, Laercio
Moura, Lidia Zytynski
Maia, Lilia Nigro
de Oliveira, Lucia Brandão
Maia, Lucimir
da Silva, Luís Beck
Gowdak, Luís Henrique Wolff
Danzmann, Luiz Claudio
Andrade, Marcus
Braile-Sternieri, Maria Christiane Valeria Braga
Moreira, Maria da Consolação Vieira
França, Olimpio R
Filho, Otavio Rizzi Coelho
Esteves, Paulo Frederico
Raupp-da-Rosa, Priscila
Silva, Ricardo Jorge de Queiroz e
Mourilhe-Rocha, Ricardo
Viégas, Ruy Felipe Melo
Rassi, Salvador
Mangili, Sandrigo
Kaiser, Sergio Emanuel
Martins, Silvia Marinho
Kawabata, Vitor Sergio
author_sort Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This observational, cross-sectional study based aimed to test whether heart failure (HF)-disease management program (DMP) components are influencing care and clinical decision-making in Brazil. METHODS: The survey respondents were cardiologists recommended by experts in the field and invited to participate in the survey via printed form or email. The survey consisted of 29 questions addressing site demographics, public versus private infrastructure, HF baseline data of patients, clinical management of HF, performance indicators, and perceptions about HF treatment. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 98 centers (58% public and 42% private practice) distributed across Brazil. Public HF-DMPs compared to private HF-DMP were associated with a higher percentage of HF-DMP-dedicated services (79% vs 24%; OR: 12, 95% CI: 94-34), multidisciplinary HF (MHF)-DMP [84% vs 65%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-8), HF educational programs (49% vs 18%; OR: 4; 95% CI: 1-2), written instructions before hospital discharge (83% vs 76%; OR: 1; 95% CI: 0-5), rehabilitation (69% vs 39%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-9), monitoring (44% vs 29%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 1-5), guideline-directed medical therapy-HF use (94% vs 85%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 0-15), and less B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) dosage (73% vs 88%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-9), and key performance indicators (37% vs 60%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-7). In comparison to non- MHF-DMP, MHF-DMP was associated with more educational initiatives (42% vs 6%; OR: 12; 95% CI: 1-97), written instructions (83% vs 68%; OR: 2: 95% CI: 1-7), rehabilitation (69% vs 17%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 3-44), monitoring (47% vs 6%; OR: 14; 95% CI: 2-115), GDMT-HF (92% vs 83%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 0-15). In addition, there were less use of BNP as a biomarker (70% vs 84%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 1-8) and key performance indicators (35% vs 51%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 91,6) in the non-MHF group. Physicians considered changing or introducing new medications mostly when patients were hospitalized or when observing worsening disease and/or symptoms. Adherence to drug treatment and non-drug treatment factors were the greatest medical problems associated with HF treatment. CONCLUSION: HF-DMPs are highly heterogeneous. New strategies for HF care should consider the present study highlights and clinical decision-making processes to improve HF patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7798368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77983682021-01-18 Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers Bocchi, Edimar Alcides Moreira, Henrique Turin Nakamuta, Juliana Sanajotti Simões, Marcus Vinicius Casas, Alberto de Almeida Las da Costa, Altamiro Reis de Assis, Amberson Vieira Durães, André Rodrigues Pereira-Barretto, Antonio Carlos Ravessa, Antonio Delduque de Araujo Macedo, Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli Biselli, Bruno Pinto, Carolina Maria Nogueira Filho, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann Costantini, Costantino Roberto Almeida, Dirceu Rodrigues dos Santos, Edval Gomes Soliva, Erwin Figueiredo, Estevão Lanna de Albuquerque, Felipe Neves Paulitsch, Felipe Neuenschwander, Fernando Carvalho de Figueiredo, José Albuquerque Brito, Flavio de Souza Lopes, Heno Ferreira Villacorta, Humberto de Souza, João David Sepulveda, João Mariano Ayoub, José Carlos Aidar Vilela-Martin, José F. Cardoso, Juliano Novaes Uemura, Laercio Moura, Lidia Zytynski Maia, Lilia Nigro de Oliveira, Lucia Brandão Maia, Lucimir da Silva, Luís Beck Gowdak, Luís Henrique Wolff Danzmann, Luiz Claudio Andrade, Marcus Braile-Sternieri, Maria Christiane Valeria Braga Moreira, Maria da Consolação Vieira França, Olimpio R Filho, Otavio Rizzi Coelho Esteves, Paulo Frederico Raupp-da-Rosa, Priscila Silva, Ricardo Jorge de Queiroz e Mourilhe-Rocha, Ricardo Viégas, Ruy Felipe Melo Rassi, Salvador Mangili, Sandrigo Kaiser, Sergio Emanuel Martins, Silvia Marinho Kawabata, Vitor Sergio Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: This observational, cross-sectional study based aimed to test whether heart failure (HF)-disease management program (DMP) components are influencing care and clinical decision-making in Brazil. METHODS: The survey respondents were cardiologists recommended by experts in the field and invited to participate in the survey via printed form or email. The survey consisted of 29 questions addressing site demographics, public versus private infrastructure, HF baseline data of patients, clinical management of HF, performance indicators, and perceptions about HF treatment. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 98 centers (58% public and 42% private practice) distributed across Brazil. Public HF-DMPs compared to private HF-DMP were associated with a higher percentage of HF-DMP-dedicated services (79% vs 24%; OR: 12, 95% CI: 94-34), multidisciplinary HF (MHF)-DMP [84% vs 65%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-8), HF educational programs (49% vs 18%; OR: 4; 95% CI: 1-2), written instructions before hospital discharge (83% vs 76%; OR: 1; 95% CI: 0-5), rehabilitation (69% vs 39%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-9), monitoring (44% vs 29%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 1-5), guideline-directed medical therapy-HF use (94% vs 85%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 0-15), and less B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) dosage (73% vs 88%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-9), and key performance indicators (37% vs 60%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 1-7). In comparison to non- MHF-DMP, MHF-DMP was associated with more educational initiatives (42% vs 6%; OR: 12; 95% CI: 1-97), written instructions (83% vs 68%; OR: 2: 95% CI: 1-7), rehabilitation (69% vs 17%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 3-44), monitoring (47% vs 6%; OR: 14; 95% CI: 2-115), GDMT-HF (92% vs 83%; OR: 3; 95% CI: 0-15). In addition, there were less use of BNP as a biomarker (70% vs 84%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 1-8) and key performance indicators (35% vs 51%; OR: 2; 95% CI: 91,6) in the non-MHF group. Physicians considered changing or introducing new medications mostly when patients were hospitalized or when observing worsening disease and/or symptoms. Adherence to drug treatment and non-drug treatment factors were the greatest medical problems associated with HF treatment. CONCLUSION: HF-DMPs are highly heterogeneous. New strategies for HF care should consider the present study highlights and clinical decision-making processes to improve HF patient care. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2021-01-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7798368/ /pubmed/33503176 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e1991 Text en Copyright © 2021 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
Moreira, Henrique Turin
Nakamuta, Juliana Sanajotti
Simões, Marcus Vinicius
Casas, Alberto de Almeida Las
da Costa, Altamiro Reis
de Assis, Amberson Vieira
Durães, André Rodrigues
Pereira-Barretto, Antonio Carlos
Ravessa, Antonio Delduque de Araujo
Macedo, Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli
Biselli, Bruno
Pinto, Carolina Maria Nogueira
Filho, Conrado Roberto Hoffmann
Costantini, Costantino Roberto
Almeida, Dirceu Rodrigues
dos Santos, Edval Gomes
Soliva, Erwin
Figueiredo, Estevão Lanna
de Albuquerque, Felipe Neves
Paulitsch, Felipe
Neuenschwander, Fernando Carvalho
de Figueiredo, José Albuquerque
Brito, Flavio de Souza
Lopes, Heno Ferreira
Villacorta, Humberto
de Souza, João David
Sepulveda, João Mariano
Ayoub, José Carlos Aidar
Vilela-Martin, José F.
Cardoso, Juliano Novaes
Uemura, Laercio
Moura, Lidia Zytynski
Maia, Lilia Nigro
de Oliveira, Lucia Brandão
Maia, Lucimir
da Silva, Luís Beck
Gowdak, Luís Henrique Wolff
Danzmann, Luiz Claudio
Andrade, Marcus
Braile-Sternieri, Maria Christiane Valeria Braga
Moreira, Maria da Consolação Vieira
França, Olimpio R
Filho, Otavio Rizzi Coelho
Esteves, Paulo Frederico
Raupp-da-Rosa, Priscila
Silva, Ricardo Jorge de Queiroz e
Mourilhe-Rocha, Ricardo
Viégas, Ruy Felipe Melo
Rassi, Salvador
Mangili, Sandrigo
Kaiser, Sergio Emanuel
Martins, Silvia Marinho
Kawabata, Vitor Sergio
Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers
title Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers
title_full Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers
title_fullStr Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers
title_full_unstemmed Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers
title_short Implications for Clinical Practice from a Multicenter Survey of Heart Failure Management Centers
title_sort implications for clinical practice from a multicenter survey of heart failure management centers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7798368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33503176
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e1991
work_keys_str_mv AT bocchiedimaralcides implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT moreirahenriqueturin implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT nakamutajulianasanajotti implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT simoesmarcusvinicius implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT casasalbertodealmeidalas implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT dacostaaltamiroreis implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT deassisambersonvieira implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT duraesandrerodrigues implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT pereirabarrettoantoniocarlos implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT ravessaantoniodelduquedearaujo implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT macedoarianevieirascarlatelli implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT bisellibruno implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT pintocarolinamarianogueira implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT filhoconradorobertohoffmann implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT costantinicostantinoroberto implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT almeidadirceurodrigues implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT dossantosedvalgomes implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT solivaerwin implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT figueiredoestevaolanna implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT dealbuquerquefelipeneves implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT paulitschfelipe implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT neuenschwanderfernandocarvalho implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT defigueiredojosealbuquerque implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT britoflaviodesouza implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT lopeshenoferreira implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT villacortahumberto implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT desouzajoaodavid implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT sepulvedajoaomariano implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT ayoubjosecarlosaidar implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT vilelamartinjosef implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT cardosojulianonovaes implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT uemuralaercio implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT mouralidiazytynski implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT maialilianigro implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT deoliveiraluciabrandao implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT maialucimir implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT dasilvaluisbeck implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT gowdakluishenriquewolff implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT danzmannluizclaudio implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT andrademarcus implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT brailesternierimariachristianevaleriabraga implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT moreiramariadaconsolacaovieira implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT francaolimpior implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT filhootaviorizzicoelho implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT estevespaulofrederico implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT rauppdarosapriscila implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT silvaricardojorgedequeiroze implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT mourilherocharicardo implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT viegasruyfelipemelo implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT rassisalvador implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT mangilisandrigo implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT kaisersergioemanuel implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT martinssilviamarinho implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters
AT kawabatavitorsergio implicationsforclinicalpracticefromamulticentersurveyofheartfailuremanagementcenters