Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Intolerance to gastric feeding tubes is common among critically ill adults and may increase morbidity. Administration of prokinetics in the ICU is common. However, the efficacy and safety of prokinetics are unclear in critically ill adults with gastric feeding tubes. We conducted a syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Rong, Li, Hailong, Yang, Lijun, Zeng, Linan, Yi, Qiusha, Xu, Peipei, Pan, Xiangcheng, Zhang, Lingli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7799841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33428672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245317
_version_ 1783635219459342336
author Peng, Rong
Li, Hailong
Yang, Lijun
Zeng, Linan
Yi, Qiusha
Xu, Peipei
Pan, Xiangcheng
Zhang, Lingli
author_facet Peng, Rong
Li, Hailong
Yang, Lijun
Zeng, Linan
Yi, Qiusha
Xu, Peipei
Pan, Xiangcheng
Zhang, Lingli
author_sort Peng, Rong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intolerance to gastric feeding tubes is common among critically ill adults and may increase morbidity. Administration of prokinetics in the ICU is common. However, the efficacy and safety of prokinetics are unclear in critically ill adults with gastric feeding tubes. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of prokinetics for improving gastric feeding tube tolerance in critically ill adults. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by systematically searching the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant data and assessed the quality of the studies. We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. A total of 10 RCTs involving 846 participants were eligible for the quantitative analysis. Most studies (10 of 13, 76.92%) showed that prokinetics had beneficial effects on feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. In critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding, prokinetic agents may reduce the ICU length of stay (MD -2.03, 95% CI -3.96, -0.10; P = 0.04; low certainty) and the hospital length of stay (MD -3.21, 95% CI -5.35, -1.06; P = 0.003; low certainty). However, prokinetics failed to improve the outcomes of reported adverse events and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: As a class of drugs, prokinetics may improve tolerance to gastric feeding to some extent in critically ill adults. However, the certainty of the evidence suggesting that prokinetics reduce the ICU or hospital length of stay is low. Prokinetics did not significantly decrease the risks of reported adverse events or all-cause mortality among critically ill adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7799841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77998412021-01-22 The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis Peng, Rong Li, Hailong Yang, Lijun Zeng, Linan Yi, Qiusha Xu, Peipei Pan, Xiangcheng Zhang, Lingli PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Intolerance to gastric feeding tubes is common among critically ill adults and may increase morbidity. Administration of prokinetics in the ICU is common. However, the efficacy and safety of prokinetics are unclear in critically ill adults with gastric feeding tubes. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of prokinetics for improving gastric feeding tube tolerance in critically ill adults. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by systematically searching the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant data and assessed the quality of the studies. We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. A total of 10 RCTs involving 846 participants were eligible for the quantitative analysis. Most studies (10 of 13, 76.92%) showed that prokinetics had beneficial effects on feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. In critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding, prokinetic agents may reduce the ICU length of stay (MD -2.03, 95% CI -3.96, -0.10; P = 0.04; low certainty) and the hospital length of stay (MD -3.21, 95% CI -5.35, -1.06; P = 0.003; low certainty). However, prokinetics failed to improve the outcomes of reported adverse events and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: As a class of drugs, prokinetics may improve tolerance to gastric feeding to some extent in critically ill adults. However, the certainty of the evidence suggesting that prokinetics reduce the ICU or hospital length of stay is low. Prokinetics did not significantly decrease the risks of reported adverse events or all-cause mortality among critically ill adults. Public Library of Science 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7799841/ /pubmed/33428672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245317 Text en © 2021 Peng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peng, Rong
Li, Hailong
Yang, Lijun
Zeng, Linan
Yi, Qiusha
Xu, Peipei
Pan, Xiangcheng
Zhang, Lingli
The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7799841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33428672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245317
work_keys_str_mv AT pengrong theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihailong theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanglijun theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zenglinan theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yiqiusha theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xupeipei theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panxiangcheng theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanglingli theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pengrong efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihailong efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanglijun efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zenglinan efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yiqiusha efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xupeipei efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panxiangcheng efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanglingli efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis