Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Intolerance to gastric feeding tubes is common among critically ill adults and may increase morbidity. Administration of prokinetics in the ICU is common. However, the efficacy and safety of prokinetics are unclear in critically ill adults with gastric feeding tubes. We conducted a syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7799841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33428672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245317 |
_version_ | 1783635219459342336 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Rong Li, Hailong Yang, Lijun Zeng, Linan Yi, Qiusha Xu, Peipei Pan, Xiangcheng Zhang, Lingli |
author_facet | Peng, Rong Li, Hailong Yang, Lijun Zeng, Linan Yi, Qiusha Xu, Peipei Pan, Xiangcheng Zhang, Lingli |
author_sort | Peng, Rong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intolerance to gastric feeding tubes is common among critically ill adults and may increase morbidity. Administration of prokinetics in the ICU is common. However, the efficacy and safety of prokinetics are unclear in critically ill adults with gastric feeding tubes. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of prokinetics for improving gastric feeding tube tolerance in critically ill adults. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by systematically searching the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant data and assessed the quality of the studies. We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. A total of 10 RCTs involving 846 participants were eligible for the quantitative analysis. Most studies (10 of 13, 76.92%) showed that prokinetics had beneficial effects on feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. In critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding, prokinetic agents may reduce the ICU length of stay (MD -2.03, 95% CI -3.96, -0.10; P = 0.04; low certainty) and the hospital length of stay (MD -3.21, 95% CI -5.35, -1.06; P = 0.003; low certainty). However, prokinetics failed to improve the outcomes of reported adverse events and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: As a class of drugs, prokinetics may improve tolerance to gastric feeding to some extent in critically ill adults. However, the certainty of the evidence suggesting that prokinetics reduce the ICU or hospital length of stay is low. Prokinetics did not significantly decrease the risks of reported adverse events or all-cause mortality among critically ill adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7799841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77998412021-01-22 The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis Peng, Rong Li, Hailong Yang, Lijun Zeng, Linan Yi, Qiusha Xu, Peipei Pan, Xiangcheng Zhang, Lingli PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Intolerance to gastric feeding tubes is common among critically ill adults and may increase morbidity. Administration of prokinetics in the ICU is common. However, the efficacy and safety of prokinetics are unclear in critically ill adults with gastric feeding tubes. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of prokinetics for improving gastric feeding tube tolerance in critically ill adults. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by systematically searching the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant data and assessed the quality of the studies. We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. A total of 10 RCTs involving 846 participants were eligible for the quantitative analysis. Most studies (10 of 13, 76.92%) showed that prokinetics had beneficial effects on feeding intolerance in critically ill adults. In critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding, prokinetic agents may reduce the ICU length of stay (MD -2.03, 95% CI -3.96, -0.10; P = 0.04; low certainty) and the hospital length of stay (MD -3.21, 95% CI -5.35, -1.06; P = 0.003; low certainty). However, prokinetics failed to improve the outcomes of reported adverse events and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: As a class of drugs, prokinetics may improve tolerance to gastric feeding to some extent in critically ill adults. However, the certainty of the evidence suggesting that prokinetics reduce the ICU or hospital length of stay is low. Prokinetics did not significantly decrease the risks of reported adverse events or all-cause mortality among critically ill adults. Public Library of Science 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7799841/ /pubmed/33428672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245317 Text en © 2021 Peng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peng, Rong Li, Hailong Yang, Lijun Zeng, Linan Yi, Qiusha Xu, Peipei Pan, Xiangcheng Zhang, Lingli The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of prokinetics in critically ill adults receiving gastric feeding tubes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7799841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33428672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengrong theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihailong theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanglijun theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zenglinan theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yiqiusha theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xupeipei theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panxiangcheng theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanglingli theefficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pengrong efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihailong efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanglijun efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zenglinan efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yiqiusha efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xupeipei efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panxiangcheng efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanglingli efficacyandsafetyofprokineticsincriticallyilladultsreceivinggastricfeedingtubesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |