Cargando…
C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study
BACKGROUND: In primary care, the diagnosis of pneumonia is often based on history and clinical examination alone. However, a previous study showed that the general practitioner’s degree of suspicion correlates well with findings on chest X-ray, when the C-reactive protein (CRP) value is known. OBJEC...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33399009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2020.1852547 |
_version_ | 1783635485085663232 |
---|---|
author | Moberg, Anna B. Jensen, Anna Ravell Paues, Jakob Magnus, Falk |
author_facet | Moberg, Anna B. Jensen, Anna Ravell Paues, Jakob Magnus, Falk |
author_sort | Moberg, Anna B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In primary care, the diagnosis of pneumonia is often based on history and clinical examination alone. However, a previous study showed that the general practitioner’s degree of suspicion correlates well with findings on chest X-ray, when the C-reactive protein (CRP) value is known. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate to what extent the physician’s degree of suspicion is affected by the CRP level when community-acquired pneumonia is suspected in primary care. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at five primary health care centres in Sweden between October 2015 and December 2017. Adult patients (n = 266) consulting their health care centre with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection, where the physician suspected pneumonia, were included consecutively. Anamnestic information and findings from clinical examination were documented in a case report form. All patients were tested for CRP. The physicians rated their degree of suspicion as ‘unsure,’ ‘quite sure,’ and ‘sure’ before and after the CRP result. RESULTS: The degree of suspicion of pneumonia changed in 69% of the cases; most often to a lower degree (40%). In 28% of the cases, there was no longer any suspicion of pneumonia after CRP. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that CRP testing highly influences the physician’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care and that it seems to be of most value when not sure of the diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7801023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78010232021-01-21 C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study Moberg, Anna B. Jensen, Anna Ravell Paues, Jakob Magnus, Falk Eur J Gen Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: In primary care, the diagnosis of pneumonia is often based on history and clinical examination alone. However, a previous study showed that the general practitioner’s degree of suspicion correlates well with findings on chest X-ray, when the C-reactive protein (CRP) value is known. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate to what extent the physician’s degree of suspicion is affected by the CRP level when community-acquired pneumonia is suspected in primary care. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at five primary health care centres in Sweden between October 2015 and December 2017. Adult patients (n = 266) consulting their health care centre with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection, where the physician suspected pneumonia, were included consecutively. Anamnestic information and findings from clinical examination were documented in a case report form. All patients were tested for CRP. The physicians rated their degree of suspicion as ‘unsure,’ ‘quite sure,’ and ‘sure’ before and after the CRP result. RESULTS: The degree of suspicion of pneumonia changed in 69% of the cases; most often to a lower degree (40%). In 28% of the cases, there was no longer any suspicion of pneumonia after CRP. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that CRP testing highly influences the physician’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care and that it seems to be of most value when not sure of the diagnosis. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7801023/ /pubmed/33399009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2020.1852547 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moberg, Anna B. Jensen, Anna Ravell Paues, Jakob Magnus, Falk C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study |
title | C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study |
title_full | C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study |
title_short | C-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study |
title_sort | c-reactive protein influences the doctor’s degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care: a prospective observational study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33399009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2020.1852547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mobergannab creactiveproteininfluencesthedoctorsdegreeofsuspicionofpneumoniainprimarycareaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT jensenannaravell creactiveproteininfluencesthedoctorsdegreeofsuspicionofpneumoniainprimarycareaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT pauesjakob creactiveproteininfluencesthedoctorsdegreeofsuspicionofpneumoniainprimarycareaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT magnusfalk creactiveproteininfluencesthedoctorsdegreeofsuspicionofpneumoniainprimarycareaprospectiveobservationalstudy |