Cargando…

Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE: Perirenal fat stranding (PRFS) is defined as linear areas of soft-tissue attenuation in the perirenal space that can result from ureteral obstruction. We analyzed the prognostic impact of PRFS on outcomes in patients with ureteral urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Jae-Wook, Lee, Jun Nyung, Park, Kyong Min, Byeon, Kyeong Hyeon, Cheon, Hyejin, Ha, Yun-Sok, Choi, Seock Hwan, Kim, Bum Soo, Kim, Tae-Hwan, Yoo, Eun Sang, Kwon, Tae Gyun, Kim, Hyun Tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314805
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200125
_version_ 1783635514021117952
author Chung, Jae-Wook
Lee, Jun Nyung
Park, Kyong Min
Byeon, Kyeong Hyeon
Cheon, Hyejin
Ha, Yun-Sok
Choi, Seock Hwan
Kim, Bum Soo
Kim, Tae-Hwan
Yoo, Eun Sang
Kwon, Tae Gyun
Kim, Hyun Tae
author_facet Chung, Jae-Wook
Lee, Jun Nyung
Park, Kyong Min
Byeon, Kyeong Hyeon
Cheon, Hyejin
Ha, Yun-Sok
Choi, Seock Hwan
Kim, Bum Soo
Kim, Tae-Hwan
Yoo, Eun Sang
Kwon, Tae Gyun
Kim, Hyun Tae
author_sort Chung, Jae-Wook
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Perirenal fat stranding (PRFS) is defined as linear areas of soft-tissue attenuation in the perirenal space that can result from ureteral obstruction. We analyzed the prognostic impact of PRFS on outcomes in patients with ureteral urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 126 patients evaluated preoperatively by computerized tomography (CT) scan and diagnosed with ureteral UC following nephroureterectomy between January 2001 and May 2018 were included. We analyzed associations between oncologic outcomes and secondary signs such as hydronephrosis and PRFS. RESULTS: Overall, 68 patients (54.0%) showed PRFS on preoperative CT scans. The patients' mean age was 66.33±9.49 years. A high pT stage (≥T3) was seen in 47 patients (37.3%) and high-grade tumors were seen in 90 patients (71.4%). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was seen in 15 patients (11.9%), and 5 (4.0%) were at the pN1 stage. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that cT stage≥3, PRFS, pT stage≥3, tumor grade, LVI, and pN1 stage were independent prognostic factors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PRFS was found to be an independent prognostic factor for RFS and CSS. PRFS is easily detectable in preoperative CT imaging and may be useful for improving the prediction of oncologic outcomes of ureteral UC. Therefore, PRFS along with other important preoperative CT findings can help urologists give preoperative advice to patients with ureteral UC before surgical management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7801158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78011582021-01-21 Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma Chung, Jae-Wook Lee, Jun Nyung Park, Kyong Min Byeon, Kyeong Hyeon Cheon, Hyejin Ha, Yun-Sok Choi, Seock Hwan Kim, Bum Soo Kim, Tae-Hwan Yoo, Eun Sang Kwon, Tae Gyun Kim, Hyun Tae Investig Clin Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Perirenal fat stranding (PRFS) is defined as linear areas of soft-tissue attenuation in the perirenal space that can result from ureteral obstruction. We analyzed the prognostic impact of PRFS on outcomes in patients with ureteral urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 126 patients evaluated preoperatively by computerized tomography (CT) scan and diagnosed with ureteral UC following nephroureterectomy between January 2001 and May 2018 were included. We analyzed associations between oncologic outcomes and secondary signs such as hydronephrosis and PRFS. RESULTS: Overall, 68 patients (54.0%) showed PRFS on preoperative CT scans. The patients' mean age was 66.33±9.49 years. A high pT stage (≥T3) was seen in 47 patients (37.3%) and high-grade tumors were seen in 90 patients (71.4%). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was seen in 15 patients (11.9%), and 5 (4.0%) were at the pN1 stage. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that cT stage≥3, PRFS, pT stage≥3, tumor grade, LVI, and pN1 stage were independent prognostic factors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PRFS was found to be an independent prognostic factor for RFS and CSS. PRFS is easily detectable in preoperative CT imaging and may be useful for improving the prediction of oncologic outcomes of ureteral UC. Therefore, PRFS along with other important preoperative CT findings can help urologists give preoperative advice to patients with ureteral UC before surgical management. The Korean Urological Association 2021-01 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7801158/ /pubmed/33314805 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200125 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chung, Jae-Wook
Lee, Jun Nyung
Park, Kyong Min
Byeon, Kyeong Hyeon
Cheon, Hyejin
Ha, Yun-Sok
Choi, Seock Hwan
Kim, Bum Soo
Kim, Tae-Hwan
Yoo, Eun Sang
Kwon, Tae Gyun
Kim, Hyun Tae
Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma
title Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma
title_full Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma
title_short Prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma
title_sort prognostic impact of perirenal fat stranding on oncologic outcomes in ureteral urothelial carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314805
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200125
work_keys_str_mv AT chungjaewook prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT leejunnyung prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT parkkyongmin prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT byeonkyeonghyeon prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT cheonhyejin prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT hayunsok prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT choiseockhwan prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT kimbumsoo prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT kimtaehwan prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT yooeunsang prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT kwontaegyun prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma
AT kimhyuntae prognosticimpactofperirenalfatstrandingononcologicoutcomesinureteralurothelialcarcinoma