Cargando…

The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths

With cochlear implantation (CI) being the standard of care for profoundly deaf cases, more and more patients with low frequency residual hearing are currently being treated with CI. In view of preserving the residual hearing, the ultimate aim of both the surgeons and the CI companies is to achieve z...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dhanasingh, Anandhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33474544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2019.12.003
_version_ 1783635537054138368
author Dhanasingh, Anandhan
author_facet Dhanasingh, Anandhan
author_sort Dhanasingh, Anandhan
collection PubMed
description With cochlear implantation (CI) being the standard of care for profoundly deaf cases, more and more patients with low frequency residual hearing are currently being treated with CI. In view of preserving the residual hearing, the ultimate aim of both the surgeons and the CI companies is to achieve zero-degree of electrode insertion trauma. Variations in the size and shape of cochlea, cross-sectional dimensions of ST, electrode insertion techniques with and without metal stylet rod and the experience level of the operating surgeons, all play a role in the electrode array related insertion trauma. An effective electrode design must include flexible array to accommodate the cochlear shape variation, electrode with variety of array lengths to support the concept of cochlear size specific electrode array and finally smaller cross-sectional dimensions of electrode array in matching the cross-sectional dimensions of ST. As per published reports, FLEX electrode array design offers minimal degree of electrode insertion trauma along with the possibility of patient specific electrode array length matching their cochlear size. Looking at the cross-sectional dimensions of FLEX electrode array along with its volume, it appear to be highly safe to the cochlea by not taking too much volume inside the ST. To offer additional support, otological pre-planning software tool like OTOPLAN is now clinically available in measuring the cochlear size in finding the best electrode array match along with the possibilities of anatomy based post-operative speech processor fitting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7801259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78012592021-01-19 The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths Dhanasingh, Anandhan World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Review Article With cochlear implantation (CI) being the standard of care for profoundly deaf cases, more and more patients with low frequency residual hearing are currently being treated with CI. In view of preserving the residual hearing, the ultimate aim of both the surgeons and the CI companies is to achieve zero-degree of electrode insertion trauma. Variations in the size and shape of cochlea, cross-sectional dimensions of ST, electrode insertion techniques with and without metal stylet rod and the experience level of the operating surgeons, all play a role in the electrode array related insertion trauma. An effective electrode design must include flexible array to accommodate the cochlear shape variation, electrode with variety of array lengths to support the concept of cochlear size specific electrode array and finally smaller cross-sectional dimensions of electrode array in matching the cross-sectional dimensions of ST. As per published reports, FLEX electrode array design offers minimal degree of electrode insertion trauma along with the possibility of patient specific electrode array length matching their cochlear size. Looking at the cross-sectional dimensions of FLEX electrode array along with its volume, it appear to be highly safe to the cochlea by not taking too much volume inside the ST. To offer additional support, otological pre-planning software tool like OTOPLAN is now clinically available in measuring the cochlear size in finding the best electrode array match along with the possibilities of anatomy based post-operative speech processor fitting. KeAi Publishing 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7801259/ /pubmed/33474544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2019.12.003 Text en © 2020 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Dhanasingh, Anandhan
The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths
title The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths
title_full The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths
title_fullStr The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths
title_full_unstemmed The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths
title_short The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths
title_sort rationale for flex (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33474544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2019.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT dhanasinghanandhan therationaleforflexcochlearimplantelectrodewithvaryingarraylengths
AT dhanasinghanandhan rationaleforflexcochlearimplantelectrodewithvaryingarraylengths