Cargando…

Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate of 20–25%. As approximately only 20% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are initially staged as resectable, it is necessary to evaluate new therapeutic approaches. Hence, neoadjuvant (radio)chemotherapy is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmermann, Carolin, Distler, Marius, Jentsch, Christina, Blum, Sophia, Folprecht, Gunnar, Zöphel, Klaus, Polster, Heike, Troost, Esther G. C., Abolmaali, Nasreddin, Weitz, Jürgen, Baumann, Michael, Saeger, Hans-Detlev, Grützmann, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32638040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01654-4
_version_ 1783635551246614528
author Zimmermann, Carolin
Distler, Marius
Jentsch, Christina
Blum, Sophia
Folprecht, Gunnar
Zöphel, Klaus
Polster, Heike
Troost, Esther G. C.
Abolmaali, Nasreddin
Weitz, Jürgen
Baumann, Michael
Saeger, Hans-Detlev
Grützmann, Robert
author_facet Zimmermann, Carolin
Distler, Marius
Jentsch, Christina
Blum, Sophia
Folprecht, Gunnar
Zöphel, Klaus
Polster, Heike
Troost, Esther G. C.
Abolmaali, Nasreddin
Weitz, Jürgen
Baumann, Michael
Saeger, Hans-Detlev
Grützmann, Robert
author_sort Zimmermann, Carolin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate of 20–25%. As approximately only 20% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are initially staged as resectable, it is necessary to evaluate new therapeutic approaches. Hence, neoadjuvant (radio)chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic option, especially in patients with a borderline resectable tumor. The aim of this non-randomized, monocentric, prospective, phase II clinical study was to assess the prognostic value of functional imaging techniques, i.e., [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), prior to and during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven resectable, borderline resectable or unresectable non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and DW-MRI including T1- and T2-weighted sequences prior to and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as following induction radiochemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the response as quantified by the standardized uptake value (SUV) measured with FDG-PET. Response to treatment was evaluated by FDG-PET and DW-MRI during and after the neoadjuvant course. Morphologic staging was performed using contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced MRI to decide inclusion of patients and resectability after neoadjuvant therapy. In those patients undergoing subsequent surgery, imaging findings were correlated with those of the pathologic resection specimen. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were enrolled in the study. The response rate measured by FDG-PET was 85% with a statistically significant decrease of the maximal SUV (SUV(max)) during therapy (p < 0.001). Using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), response was not detectable with DW-MRI. After neoadjuvant treatment 16 patients underwent surgery. In 12 (48%) patients tumor resection could be performed. The median overall survival of all patients was 25 months (range: 7–38 months). CONCLUSION: Based on these limited patient numbers, it was possible to show that this trial design is feasible and that the neoadjuvant therapy regime was well tolerated. FDG-PET/CT may be a reliable method to evaluate response to the combined therapy. In contrast, when evaluating the response using mean ADC, DW-MRI did not show conclusive results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01654-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7801319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78013192021-01-21 Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11) Zimmermann, Carolin Distler, Marius Jentsch, Christina Blum, Sophia Folprecht, Gunnar Zöphel, Klaus Polster, Heike Troost, Esther G. C. Abolmaali, Nasreddin Weitz, Jürgen Baumann, Michael Saeger, Hans-Detlev Grützmann, Robert Strahlenther Onkol Original Article BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate of 20–25%. As approximately only 20% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are initially staged as resectable, it is necessary to evaluate new therapeutic approaches. Hence, neoadjuvant (radio)chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic option, especially in patients with a borderline resectable tumor. The aim of this non-randomized, monocentric, prospective, phase II clinical study was to assess the prognostic value of functional imaging techniques, i.e., [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), prior to and during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven resectable, borderline resectable or unresectable non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and DW-MRI including T1- and T2-weighted sequences prior to and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as following induction radiochemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the response as quantified by the standardized uptake value (SUV) measured with FDG-PET. Response to treatment was evaluated by FDG-PET and DW-MRI during and after the neoadjuvant course. Morphologic staging was performed using contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced MRI to decide inclusion of patients and resectability after neoadjuvant therapy. In those patients undergoing subsequent surgery, imaging findings were correlated with those of the pathologic resection specimen. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were enrolled in the study. The response rate measured by FDG-PET was 85% with a statistically significant decrease of the maximal SUV (SUV(max)) during therapy (p < 0.001). Using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), response was not detectable with DW-MRI. After neoadjuvant treatment 16 patients underwent surgery. In 12 (48%) patients tumor resection could be performed. The median overall survival of all patients was 25 months (range: 7–38 months). CONCLUSION: Based on these limited patient numbers, it was possible to show that this trial design is feasible and that the neoadjuvant therapy regime was well tolerated. FDG-PET/CT may be a reliable method to evaluate response to the combined therapy. In contrast, when evaluating the response using mean ADC, DW-MRI did not show conclusive results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01654-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7801319/ /pubmed/32638040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01654-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zimmermann, Carolin
Distler, Marius
Jentsch, Christina
Blum, Sophia
Folprecht, Gunnar
Zöphel, Klaus
Polster, Heike
Troost, Esther G. C.
Abolmaali, Nasreddin
Weitz, Jürgen
Baumann, Michael
Saeger, Hans-Detlev
Grützmann, Robert
Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)
title Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)
title_full Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)
title_fullStr Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)
title_short Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial—PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)
title_sort evaluation of response using fdg-pet/ct and diffusion weighted mri after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase ii clinical trial—paca-dd-041 (eudra-ct 2009-011968-11)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32638040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01654-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermanncarolin evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT distlermarius evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT jentschchristina evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT blumsophia evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT folprechtgunnar evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT zophelklaus evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT polsterheike evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT troostesthergc evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT abolmaalinasreddin evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT weitzjurgen evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT baumannmichael evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT saegerhansdetlev evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811
AT grutzmannrobert evaluationofresponseusingfdgpetctanddiffusionweightedmriafterradiochemotherapyofpancreaticcanceranonrandomizedmonocentricphaseiiclinicaltrialpacadd041eudract200901196811