Cargando…

Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: Ilizarov hip reconstruction (IHR) is a traditional method of salvaging chronic adolescent problem hips but faces practical problems from external fixators leading to reduced compliance. We present the same reconstruction utilising only internal devices with a modification in techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metikala, Sreenivasulu, Kurian, Binu T, Madan, Sanjeev S, Fernandes, James A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1459
_version_ 1783635669361360896
author Metikala, Sreenivasulu
Kurian, Binu T
Madan, Sanjeev S
Fernandes, James A
author_facet Metikala, Sreenivasulu
Kurian, Binu T
Madan, Sanjeev S
Fernandes, James A
author_sort Metikala, Sreenivasulu
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVE: Ilizarov hip reconstruction (IHR) is a traditional method of salvaging chronic adolescent problem hips but faces practical problems from external fixators leading to reduced compliance. We present the same reconstruction utilising only internal devices with a modification in technique and aim to review early results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated eight patients between 2014 and 2017 with chronic painful hips treated by a two-stage reconstruction; stage 1 included femoral head resection and pelvic support osteotomy using double plating, while stage 2 comprised distal femoral osteotomy avoiding varus followed by insertion of retrograde magnetic nail for postoperative lengthening. Patients continued physiotherapy postoperatively while protecting from early weight-bearing. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 19 months (range 6–36), all osteotomies healed with bone healing index of 47 days/cm (range 30–72). Pain improved from 8.3 (range 7–9) to 2 (range 0–6), while limb length discrepancy got corrected from 4.3 cm (range 3–5) to 1.4 cm (range 0–2.5) at final follow-up. Trendelenburg sign was eliminated in three and delayed in five. No examples of infection or permanent knee stiffness were noted. One patient had plates breakage due to mechanical fall and one had 35 mm of lateral mechanical axis deviation requiring corrective osteotomy. CONCLUSION: Pelvic support hip reconstruction with exclusive internal devices is a technique in evolution with encouraging early results. It avoids common complications of external fixators and facilitates quick rehabilitation of joints. Refraining from distal varus can effectively eliminate Trendelenburg gait, albeit with some degree of lateral mechanical axis deviation. Unlike external fixation where there is a possibility of gradual correction, this staged procedure of internal fixation is technically demanding with a learning curve. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pelvic support hip reconstruction performed by internal implants is a viable alternative to IHR with potential benefits. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Metikala S, Kurian BT, Madan SS, et al. Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):91–97.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7801897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78018972021-01-26 Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction Metikala, Sreenivasulu Kurian, Binu T Madan, Sanjeev S Fernandes, James A Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: Ilizarov hip reconstruction (IHR) is a traditional method of salvaging chronic adolescent problem hips but faces practical problems from external fixators leading to reduced compliance. We present the same reconstruction utilising only internal devices with a modification in technique and aim to review early results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated eight patients between 2014 and 2017 with chronic painful hips treated by a two-stage reconstruction; stage 1 included femoral head resection and pelvic support osteotomy using double plating, while stage 2 comprised distal femoral osteotomy avoiding varus followed by insertion of retrograde magnetic nail for postoperative lengthening. Patients continued physiotherapy postoperatively while protecting from early weight-bearing. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 19 months (range 6–36), all osteotomies healed with bone healing index of 47 days/cm (range 30–72). Pain improved from 8.3 (range 7–9) to 2 (range 0–6), while limb length discrepancy got corrected from 4.3 cm (range 3–5) to 1.4 cm (range 0–2.5) at final follow-up. Trendelenburg sign was eliminated in three and delayed in five. No examples of infection or permanent knee stiffness were noted. One patient had plates breakage due to mechanical fall and one had 35 mm of lateral mechanical axis deviation requiring corrective osteotomy. CONCLUSION: Pelvic support hip reconstruction with exclusive internal devices is a technique in evolution with encouraging early results. It avoids common complications of external fixators and facilitates quick rehabilitation of joints. Refraining from distal varus can effectively eliminate Trendelenburg gait, albeit with some degree of lateral mechanical axis deviation. Unlike external fixation where there is a possibility of gradual correction, this staged procedure of internal fixation is technically demanding with a learning curve. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pelvic support hip reconstruction performed by internal implants is a viable alternative to IHR with potential benefits. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Metikala S, Kurian BT, Madan SS, et al. Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):91–97. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7801897/ /pubmed/33505525 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1459 Text en Copyright © 2020; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-share alike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as original. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Metikala, Sreenivasulu
Kurian, Binu T
Madan, Sanjeev S
Fernandes, James A
Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction
title Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction
title_full Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction
title_fullStr Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction
title_short Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction
title_sort pelvic support hip reconstruction with internal devices: an alternative to ilizarov hip reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7801897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1459
work_keys_str_mv AT metikalasreenivasulu pelvicsupporthipreconstructionwithinternaldevicesanalternativetoilizarovhipreconstruction
AT kurianbinut pelvicsupporthipreconstructionwithinternaldevicesanalternativetoilizarovhipreconstruction
AT madansanjeevs pelvicsupporthipreconstructionwithinternaldevicesanalternativetoilizarovhipreconstruction
AT fernandesjamesa pelvicsupporthipreconstructionwithinternaldevicesanalternativetoilizarovhipreconstruction