Cargando…

Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study

BACKGROUND: Despite much research published on lung cancer screening, China has had no large-scale study on the missed diagnosis of lung cancer in a health examination population. We therefore did a real-world study using the current lung cancer screening guidelines to a health examination populatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Guiyi, Bao, Ting, Li, Zhenzhen, Tang, Huairong, Liu, Dan, Yang, Ping, Li, Weimin, Huang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07750-z
_version_ 1783635733996634112
author Ji, Guiyi
Bao, Ting
Li, Zhenzhen
Tang, Huairong
Liu, Dan
Yang, Ping
Li, Weimin
Huang, Yan
author_facet Ji, Guiyi
Bao, Ting
Li, Zhenzhen
Tang, Huairong
Liu, Dan
Yang, Ping
Li, Weimin
Huang, Yan
author_sort Ji, Guiyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite much research published on lung cancer screening, China has had no large-scale study on the missed diagnosis of lung cancer in a health examination population. We therefore did a real-world study using the current lung cancer screening guidelines to a health examination population in China to determine the proportion of lung cancer cases that have been missed. METHODS: A real-world cohort study of screening, with the use of low-dose computed tomography, was conducted among people who took yearly health checkup in health management center of West China Hospital between 2006 and 2017. We respectively used current guidelines including lung cancer screening guidelines of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and expert consensus on low dose spiral CT lung cancer screening in China. RESULTS: In a total of 15,996 participants with health examination who completed the baseline screening, 6779 (42.4%) subjects had at least one positive finding, and 142 (2.1%) cases of lung cancer were screened positive. The false positive rate was 97.9%. Of 142 lung cancer cases detected in our study, only 9.2% met the lung cancer screening guidelines proposed by the USPSTF, and 24.4% met that of China. The rates of missed diagnosis were as high as 90.8 and 75.6% respectively. In addition, we did an in-depth analysis by gender. We found that among male patients with lung cancer, the proportion of smokers was 75%, and the proportion of young people under 50 was 23.2%. Among female patients with lung cancer, the proportion of smokers was only 5.8%, and the proportion of young people under 50 was up to 33.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of missed diagnosis was as high as 90.8% applying the current lung cancer screening guidelines to the health examination population in China. Further study to determine screening guidelines for targeted populations, is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7802250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78022502021-01-13 Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study Ji, Guiyi Bao, Ting Li, Zhenzhen Tang, Huairong Liu, Dan Yang, Ping Li, Weimin Huang, Yan BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite much research published on lung cancer screening, China has had no large-scale study on the missed diagnosis of lung cancer in a health examination population. We therefore did a real-world study using the current lung cancer screening guidelines to a health examination population in China to determine the proportion of lung cancer cases that have been missed. METHODS: A real-world cohort study of screening, with the use of low-dose computed tomography, was conducted among people who took yearly health checkup in health management center of West China Hospital between 2006 and 2017. We respectively used current guidelines including lung cancer screening guidelines of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and expert consensus on low dose spiral CT lung cancer screening in China. RESULTS: In a total of 15,996 participants with health examination who completed the baseline screening, 6779 (42.4%) subjects had at least one positive finding, and 142 (2.1%) cases of lung cancer were screened positive. The false positive rate was 97.9%. Of 142 lung cancer cases detected in our study, only 9.2% met the lung cancer screening guidelines proposed by the USPSTF, and 24.4% met that of China. The rates of missed diagnosis were as high as 90.8 and 75.6% respectively. In addition, we did an in-depth analysis by gender. We found that among male patients with lung cancer, the proportion of smokers was 75%, and the proportion of young people under 50 was 23.2%. Among female patients with lung cancer, the proportion of smokers was only 5.8%, and the proportion of young people under 50 was up to 33.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of missed diagnosis was as high as 90.8% applying the current lung cancer screening guidelines to the health examination population in China. Further study to determine screening guidelines for targeted populations, is warranted. BioMed Central 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7802250/ /pubmed/33430831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07750-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ji, Guiyi
Bao, Ting
Li, Zhenzhen
Tang, Huairong
Liu, Dan
Yang, Ping
Li, Weimin
Huang, Yan
Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study
title Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study
title_full Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study
title_fullStr Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study
title_full_unstemmed Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study
title_short Current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study
title_sort current lung cancer screening guidelines may miss high-risk population: a real-world study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07750-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jiguiyi currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy
AT baoting currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy
AT lizhenzhen currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy
AT tanghuairong currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy
AT liudan currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy
AT yangping currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy
AT liweimin currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy
AT huangyan currentlungcancerscreeningguidelinesmaymisshighriskpopulationarealworldstudy