Cargando…

Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score

BACKGROUND: We aimed to propose a correction of the Lawton instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) score to take into account the possibility to have never done some activities, and measured its agreement and reliability with the usual IADL score. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dufournet, Marine, Moutet, Claire, Achi, Sarah, Delphin-Combe, Floriane, Krolak-Salmon, Pierre, Dauphinot, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01995-w
_version_ 1783635735416406016
author Dufournet, Marine
Moutet, Claire
Achi, Sarah
Delphin-Combe, Floriane
Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
Dauphinot, Virginie
author_facet Dufournet, Marine
Moutet, Claire
Achi, Sarah
Delphin-Combe, Floriane
Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
Dauphinot, Virginie
author_sort Dufournet, Marine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to propose a correction of the Lawton instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) score to take into account the possibility to have never done some activities, and measured its agreement and reliability with the usual IADL score. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients attending French memory clinics between 2014 and 2017. Lawton IADL, cognitive performance, diagnosis, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and sociodemographics characteristics were collected. A corrected IADL was calculated and its agreement with the usual IADL was assessed. RESULTS: The study included of 2391 patients (79.9 years old, 61.7% female). Based on the usual IADL, 36.9% of patients had never carried out at least one of the activities. This proportion reached 68.8% for men and 17.7% for women. Women had a mean IADL higher than men: 4.72 vs 3.49, this difference decreased when considering the corrected IADL: 4.82 vs 4.26 respectively. Based on Bland-Altman method, 93.5% of observations lied within the limits agreement. The ICC between the 2 scores was 0.98. The relationships between patients’ characteristics and the IADL scores were similar, regardless the usual or corrected version. CONCLUSIONS: This corrected IADL score had an excellent degree of agreement with the usual version based the ICC. This simple correction could benefit both for the clinical practice by providing a more accurate description of the real clinical state of the patients allowing to manage them more precisely, and for research involving the evaluation of the functional abilities of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7802257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78022572021-01-13 Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score Dufournet, Marine Moutet, Claire Achi, Sarah Delphin-Combe, Floriane Krolak-Salmon, Pierre Dauphinot, Virginie BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to propose a correction of the Lawton instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) score to take into account the possibility to have never done some activities, and measured its agreement and reliability with the usual IADL score. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients attending French memory clinics between 2014 and 2017. Lawton IADL, cognitive performance, diagnosis, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and sociodemographics characteristics were collected. A corrected IADL was calculated and its agreement with the usual IADL was assessed. RESULTS: The study included of 2391 patients (79.9 years old, 61.7% female). Based on the usual IADL, 36.9% of patients had never carried out at least one of the activities. This proportion reached 68.8% for men and 17.7% for women. Women had a mean IADL higher than men: 4.72 vs 3.49, this difference decreased when considering the corrected IADL: 4.82 vs 4.26 respectively. Based on Bland-Altman method, 93.5% of observations lied within the limits agreement. The ICC between the 2 scores was 0.98. The relationships between patients’ characteristics and the IADL scores were similar, regardless the usual or corrected version. CONCLUSIONS: This corrected IADL score had an excellent degree of agreement with the usual version based the ICC. This simple correction could benefit both for the clinical practice by providing a more accurate description of the real clinical state of the patients allowing to manage them more precisely, and for research involving the evaluation of the functional abilities of patients. BioMed Central 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7802257/ /pubmed/33430781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01995-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dufournet, Marine
Moutet, Claire
Achi, Sarah
Delphin-Combe, Floriane
Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
Dauphinot, Virginie
Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score
title Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score
title_full Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score
title_fullStr Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score
title_full_unstemmed Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score
title_short Proposition of a corrected measure of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living score
title_sort proposition of a corrected measure of the lawton instrumental activities of daily living score
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01995-w
work_keys_str_mv AT dufournetmarine propositionofacorrectedmeasureofthelawtoninstrumentalactivitiesofdailylivingscore
AT moutetclaire propositionofacorrectedmeasureofthelawtoninstrumentalactivitiesofdailylivingscore
AT achisarah propositionofacorrectedmeasureofthelawtoninstrumentalactivitiesofdailylivingscore
AT delphincombefloriane propositionofacorrectedmeasureofthelawtoninstrumentalactivitiesofdailylivingscore
AT krolaksalmonpierre propositionofacorrectedmeasureofthelawtoninstrumentalactivitiesofdailylivingscore
AT dauphinotvirginie propositionofacorrectedmeasureofthelawtoninstrumentalactivitiesofdailylivingscore
AT propositionofacorrectedmeasureofthelawtoninstrumentalactivitiesofdailylivingscore