Cargando…

One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy

BACKGROUND: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by an accumulation of subretinal fluid (SRF) in the macula. It is usually treated by laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy (PDT) with consisting of different doses and power. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of half...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pichai, Jirarattanasopa, Vanchalerm, Banchasakjaroen, Mansing, Ratanasukon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01796-0
_version_ 1783635740997976064
author Pichai, Jirarattanasopa
Vanchalerm, Banchasakjaroen
Mansing, Ratanasukon
author_facet Pichai, Jirarattanasopa
Vanchalerm, Banchasakjaroen
Mansing, Ratanasukon
author_sort Pichai, Jirarattanasopa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by an accumulation of subretinal fluid (SRF) in the macula. It is usually treated by laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy (PDT) with consisting of different doses and power. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of half-dose PDT and one-third-dose PDT in chronic or recurrent CSC. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with chronic or recurrent CSC who were treated with either a half-dose or one-third-dose PDT, and had follow up 12 months afterwards. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) at baseline as well as 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-PDT were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes and 20 eyes received half-dose and one-third-dose PDT, respectively. The study showed efficacy of the one-third-dose PDT compared with half-dose PDT in BCVA improvement (0.10±0.04 logMAR for one-third-dose versus 0.17±0.04, for half-dose, P=0.148) and CRT improvement (125.6±24.6 μm for one-third-dose versus 139.1±16.54, for half-dose, P=0.933) at 12 months. The SRF recurrence rate was significantly higher in the one-third-dose PDT group compared with the half-dose PDT group (40.0% versus 15.2%, P=0.027) at 12-months. CONCLUSION: At 12 months, the one-third-dose PDT was effective in terms of BCVA and CRT improvement, when compared with half-dose PDT. However, this study showed that one-third-dose PDT had a higher recurrence rate of SRF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7802284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78022842021-01-13 One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy Pichai, Jirarattanasopa Vanchalerm, Banchasakjaroen Mansing, Ratanasukon BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is characterized by an accumulation of subretinal fluid (SRF) in the macula. It is usually treated by laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy (PDT) with consisting of different doses and power. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of half-dose PDT and one-third-dose PDT in chronic or recurrent CSC. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with chronic or recurrent CSC who were treated with either a half-dose or one-third-dose PDT, and had follow up 12 months afterwards. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) at baseline as well as 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-PDT were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-six eyes and 20 eyes received half-dose and one-third-dose PDT, respectively. The study showed efficacy of the one-third-dose PDT compared with half-dose PDT in BCVA improvement (0.10±0.04 logMAR for one-third-dose versus 0.17±0.04, for half-dose, P=0.148) and CRT improvement (125.6±24.6 μm for one-third-dose versus 139.1±16.54, for half-dose, P=0.933) at 12 months. The SRF recurrence rate was significantly higher in the one-third-dose PDT group compared with the half-dose PDT group (40.0% versus 15.2%, P=0.027) at 12-months. CONCLUSION: At 12 months, the one-third-dose PDT was effective in terms of BCVA and CRT improvement, when compared with half-dose PDT. However, this study showed that one-third-dose PDT had a higher recurrence rate of SRF. BioMed Central 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7802284/ /pubmed/33430812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01796-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pichai, Jirarattanasopa
Vanchalerm, Banchasakjaroen
Mansing, Ratanasukon
One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy
title One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy
title_full One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy
title_fullStr One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy
title_full_unstemmed One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy
title_short One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy
title_sort one-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01796-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pichaijirarattanasopa oneyearresultsofhalfdoseversusonethirddosephotodynamictherapyinchronicorrecurrentcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT vanchalermbanchasakjaroen oneyearresultsofhalfdoseversusonethirddosephotodynamictherapyinchronicorrecurrentcentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT mansingratanasukon oneyearresultsofhalfdoseversusonethirddosephotodynamictherapyinchronicorrecurrentcentralserouschorioretinopathy