Cargando…
Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study
BACKGROUND: It is essential to avoid admission of patients with undetected corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to hospitals’ general wards. Even repeated negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results do not rule-out COVID-19 with certainty. The study aimed to evaluate a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01611-w |
_version_ | 1783635853834190848 |
---|---|
author | Teichgräber, Ulf Malouhi, Amer Ingwersen, Maja Neumann, Rotraud Reljic, Marina Deinhardt-Emmer, Stefanie Löffler, Bettina Behringer, Wilhelm Lewejohann, Jan-Christoph Stallmach, Andreas Reuken, Philipp |
author_facet | Teichgräber, Ulf Malouhi, Amer Ingwersen, Maja Neumann, Rotraud Reljic, Marina Deinhardt-Emmer, Stefanie Löffler, Bettina Behringer, Wilhelm Lewejohann, Jan-Christoph Stallmach, Andreas Reuken, Philipp |
author_sort | Teichgräber, Ulf |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is essential to avoid admission of patients with undetected corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to hospitals’ general wards. Even repeated negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results do not rule-out COVID-19 with certainty. The study aimed to evaluate a rule-out strategy for COVID-19 using chest computed tomography (CT) in adults being admitted to the emergency department and suspected of COVID-19. METHODS: In this prospective, single centre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study, consecutive adults (≥ 18 years) presenting with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 or previous contact to infected individuals, admitted to the emergency department and supposed to be referred to general ward were included in March and April 2020. All participants underwent low-dose chest CT. RT-PCR- and specific antibody tests were used as reference standard. Main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of chest CT. Predictive values were calculated based on the theorem of Bayes using Fagan’s nomogram. RESULTS: Of 165 participants (56.4% male, 71 ± 16 years) included in the study, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed with RT-PCR and AB tests in 13 participants (prevalence 7.9%). Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT were 84.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6–98.1) and 94.7% (95% CI, 89.9–97.7), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratio of chest CT were 16.1 (95% CI, 7.9–32.8) and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.05–0.58) and positive and negative predictive value were 57.9% (95% CI, 40.3–73.7) and 98.6% (95% CI, 95.3–99.6), respectively. CONCLUSION: At a low prevalence of COVID-19, chest CT could be used as a complement to repeated RT-PCR testing for early COVID-19 exclusion in adults with suspected infection before referral to hospital’s general wards. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04357938 April 22, 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7802980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78029802021-01-13 Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study Teichgräber, Ulf Malouhi, Amer Ingwersen, Maja Neumann, Rotraud Reljic, Marina Deinhardt-Emmer, Stefanie Löffler, Bettina Behringer, Wilhelm Lewejohann, Jan-Christoph Stallmach, Andreas Reuken, Philipp Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: It is essential to avoid admission of patients with undetected corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to hospitals’ general wards. Even repeated negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results do not rule-out COVID-19 with certainty. The study aimed to evaluate a rule-out strategy for COVID-19 using chest computed tomography (CT) in adults being admitted to the emergency department and suspected of COVID-19. METHODS: In this prospective, single centre, diagnostic accuracy cohort study, consecutive adults (≥ 18 years) presenting with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 or previous contact to infected individuals, admitted to the emergency department and supposed to be referred to general ward were included in March and April 2020. All participants underwent low-dose chest CT. RT-PCR- and specific antibody tests were used as reference standard. Main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of chest CT. Predictive values were calculated based on the theorem of Bayes using Fagan’s nomogram. RESULTS: Of 165 participants (56.4% male, 71 ± 16 years) included in the study, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed with RT-PCR and AB tests in 13 participants (prevalence 7.9%). Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT were 84.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6–98.1) and 94.7% (95% CI, 89.9–97.7), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratio of chest CT were 16.1 (95% CI, 7.9–32.8) and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.05–0.58) and positive and negative predictive value were 57.9% (95% CI, 40.3–73.7) and 98.6% (95% CI, 95.3–99.6), respectively. CONCLUSION: At a low prevalence of COVID-19, chest CT could be used as a complement to repeated RT-PCR testing for early COVID-19 exclusion in adults with suspected infection before referral to hospital’s general wards. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04357938 April 22, 2020. BioMed Central 2021-01-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7802980/ /pubmed/33435973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01611-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Teichgräber, Ulf Malouhi, Amer Ingwersen, Maja Neumann, Rotraud Reljic, Marina Deinhardt-Emmer, Stefanie Löffler, Bettina Behringer, Wilhelm Lewejohann, Jan-Christoph Stallmach, Andreas Reuken, Philipp Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study |
title | Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study |
title_full | Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study |
title_fullStr | Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study |
title_short | Ruling out COVID-19 by chest CT at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational SCOUT study |
title_sort | ruling out covid-19 by chest ct at emergency admission when prevalence is low: the prospective, observational scout study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7802980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01611-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teichgraberulf rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT malouhiamer rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT ingwersenmaja rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT neumannrotraud rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT reljicmarina rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT deinhardtemmerstefanie rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT lofflerbettina rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT behringerwilhelm rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT lewejohannjanchristoph rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT stallmachandreas rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy AT reukenphilipp rulingoutcovid19bychestctatemergencyadmissionwhenprevalenceislowtheprospectiveobservationalscoutstudy |