Cargando…

Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with a high economic burden. Costs of treatment are known to be high, and cost-effectiveness has been analysed for several treatment options. OBJECTIVE: As no review on economic aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder exists, the aim of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von der Warth, Rieka, Dams, Judith, Grochtdreis, Thomas, König, Hans-Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753940
_version_ 1783635877654691840
author von der Warth, Rieka
Dams, Judith
Grochtdreis, Thomas
König, Hans-Helmut
author_facet von der Warth, Rieka
Dams, Judith
Grochtdreis, Thomas
König, Hans-Helmut
author_sort von der Warth, Rieka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with a high economic burden. Costs of treatment are known to be high, and cost-effectiveness has been analysed for several treatment options. OBJECTIVE: As no review on economic aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder exists, the aim of this study was to systematically review costs-of-illness studies and economic evaluations of therapeutic treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder, and to assess their quality. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed in March 2017 and was last updated in February 2020 in the databases PubMed, PsychInfo and NHS Economic Evaluation Database. Cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations of treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder were selected. Extracted cost data were categorized as direct costs and indirect costs and inflated to 2015 US-$ purchasing power parities (PPP). Quality was assessed using an adapted cost-of-illness studies quality checklist, the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list, and the questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility of modelling studies by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research. RESULTS: In total, 13 cost-of-illness studies and 18 economic evaluations were included in the review. Annual direct excess costs ranged from 512 US-$ PPP to 19,435 US-$ PPP and annual indirect excess costs were 5,021 US-$ PPP per person. Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy (+selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor) was found to be cost-effective compared with treatment as usual and no treatment. Overall, included studies were of low and moderate quality. Studies used inappropriate economic study designs and lacked information on the economic perspective used. CONCLUSIONS: Posttraumatic stress disorder is a major public health problem that causes high healthcare costs. While trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy was found to be cost-effective, further investigations regarding pharmacotherapy and other treatments are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7803086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78030862021-01-22 Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review von der Warth, Rieka Dams, Judith Grochtdreis, Thomas König, Hans-Helmut Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with a high economic burden. Costs of treatment are known to be high, and cost-effectiveness has been analysed for several treatment options. OBJECTIVE: As no review on economic aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder exists, the aim of this study was to systematically review costs-of-illness studies and economic evaluations of therapeutic treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder, and to assess their quality. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed in March 2017 and was last updated in February 2020 in the databases PubMed, PsychInfo and NHS Economic Evaluation Database. Cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations of treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder were selected. Extracted cost data were categorized as direct costs and indirect costs and inflated to 2015 US-$ purchasing power parities (PPP). Quality was assessed using an adapted cost-of-illness studies quality checklist, the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list, and the questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility of modelling studies by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research. RESULTS: In total, 13 cost-of-illness studies and 18 economic evaluations were included in the review. Annual direct excess costs ranged from 512 US-$ PPP to 19,435 US-$ PPP and annual indirect excess costs were 5,021 US-$ PPP per person. Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy (+selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor) was found to be cost-effective compared with treatment as usual and no treatment. Overall, included studies were of low and moderate quality. Studies used inappropriate economic study designs and lacked information on the economic perspective used. CONCLUSIONS: Posttraumatic stress disorder is a major public health problem that causes high healthcare costs. While trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy was found to be cost-effective, further investigations regarding pharmacotherapy and other treatments are necessary. Taylor & Francis 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7803086/ /pubmed/33488993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753940 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
von der Warth, Rieka
Dams, Judith
Grochtdreis, Thomas
König, Hans-Helmut
Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_full Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_fullStr Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_short Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
title_sort economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753940
work_keys_str_mv AT vonderwarthrieka economicevaluationsandcostanalysesinposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT damsjudith economicevaluationsandcostanalysesinposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT grochtdreisthomas economicevaluationsandcostanalysesinposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview
AT konighanshelmut economicevaluationsandcostanalysesinposttraumaticstressdisorderasystematicreview