Cargando…
Comparison of Advanced Threshold and SITA Fast Perimetric Strategies
PURPOSE: To compare the results obtained with two threshold strategies of visual field assessment: Humphrey SITA Fast (SFA) (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and PTS 2000 Advanced Threshold (ADV) (Optopol Technology) in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma. METHODS: The study sample comprised of 53 health...
Autores principales: | Sikorski, Bartosz L., Laudencka, Adriana |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7139649 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Nomograms for Converting Perimetric Sensitivity From Full Threshold and SITA Fast to SITA Standard in Patients With Glaucoma and Healthy Subjects
por: Giammaria, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of ZETA Fast (PTS) (Optopol Technology) and Humphrey SITA Fast (SFA) (Carl Zeiss Meditec) Perimetric Strategies
por: Mathews, Basil, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison between two fast threshold strategies: SPARK and SITA in normal subjects
por: Foo, Say Kiang, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Characterization and Comparison of the 10-2 SITA-Standard and Fast Algorithms
por: Barkana, Yaniv, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Differences in visual field loss pattern when transitioning from SITA standard to SITA faster
por: Le, Christopher T., et al.
Publicado: (2022)