Cargando…

Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of sepsis on dementia incidence using German health claims data. METHODS: A total of 161,567 patients (65 years or older) were followed from 2004 to 2015 at quarterly intervals. Time since sepsis was categorized into 0 (the effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fritze, Thomas, Doblhammer, Gabriele, Widmann, Catherine N., Heneka, Michael T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000911
_version_ 1783635915304861696
author Fritze, Thomas
Doblhammer, Gabriele
Widmann, Catherine N.
Heneka, Michael T.
author_facet Fritze, Thomas
Doblhammer, Gabriele
Widmann, Catherine N.
Heneka, Michael T.
author_sort Fritze, Thomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of sepsis on dementia incidence using German health claims data. METHODS: A total of 161,567 patients (65 years or older) were followed from 2004 to 2015 at quarterly intervals. Time since sepsis was categorized into 0 (the effective quarter of sepsis diagnosis), 1–8, and ≥9 quarters since the latest diagnosis of sepsis, taking into account admission to intensive care unit and controlling for delirium, surgery, age, sex, and comorbidities. Incident dementia was defined for all persons who did not have a validated dementia diagnosis in 2004 and 2005 and who received a first-time, valid diagnosis between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: During the quarter of sepsis diagnosis, patients not admitted to intensive care had a 3.14-fold (95% CI 2.83–3.49) increased risk, and those with intensive care stay had a 2.22-fold (95% CI: 1.83–2.70) increased risk of receiving an incident dementia diagnosis compared with patients without sepsis. The impact of sepsis on incident dementia remained in the following 2 years, remitting only thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: For sepsis survivors, medium-term dementia risk remains elevated, whereas long-term risk may reach the level of those without sepsis, even after controlling for delirium. These findings encourage identifying modifiable components of hospital and rehabilitation care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7803331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78033312021-03-15 Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data Fritze, Thomas Doblhammer, Gabriele Widmann, Catherine N. Heneka, Michael T. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the short-, medium-, and long-term effects of sepsis on dementia incidence using German health claims data. METHODS: A total of 161,567 patients (65 years or older) were followed from 2004 to 2015 at quarterly intervals. Time since sepsis was categorized into 0 (the effective quarter of sepsis diagnosis), 1–8, and ≥9 quarters since the latest diagnosis of sepsis, taking into account admission to intensive care unit and controlling for delirium, surgery, age, sex, and comorbidities. Incident dementia was defined for all persons who did not have a validated dementia diagnosis in 2004 and 2005 and who received a first-time, valid diagnosis between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: During the quarter of sepsis diagnosis, patients not admitted to intensive care had a 3.14-fold (95% CI 2.83–3.49) increased risk, and those with intensive care stay had a 2.22-fold (95% CI: 1.83–2.70) increased risk of receiving an incident dementia diagnosis compared with patients without sepsis. The impact of sepsis on incident dementia remained in the following 2 years, remitting only thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: For sepsis survivors, medium-term dementia risk remains elevated, whereas long-term risk may reach the level of those without sepsis, even after controlling for delirium. These findings encourage identifying modifiable components of hospital and rehabilitation care. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7803331/ /pubmed/33293458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000911 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Fritze, Thomas
Doblhammer, Gabriele
Widmann, Catherine N.
Heneka, Michael T.
Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data
title Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data
title_full Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data
title_fullStr Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data
title_full_unstemmed Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data
title_short Time course of dementia following sepsis in German health claims data
title_sort time course of dementia following sepsis in german health claims data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000911
work_keys_str_mv AT fritzethomas timecourseofdementiafollowingsepsisingermanhealthclaimsdata
AT doblhammergabriele timecourseofdementiafollowingsepsisingermanhealthclaimsdata
AT widmanncatherinen timecourseofdementiafollowingsepsisingermanhealthclaimsdata
AT henekamichaelt timecourseofdementiafollowingsepsisingermanhealthclaimsdata