Cargando…

Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data

To develop and characterize a machine learning algorithm to discriminate acute respiratory distress syndrome from other causes of respiratory failure using only ventilator waveform data. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center ICU. PATIENTS: Adults admitte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rehm, Gregory B., Cortés-Puch, Irene, Kuhn, Brooks T., Nguyen, Jimmy, Fazio, Sarina A., Johnson, Michael A., Anderson, Nicholas R., Chuah, Chen-Nee, Adams, Jason Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000313
_version_ 1783635996097642496
author Rehm, Gregory B.
Cortés-Puch, Irene
Kuhn, Brooks T.
Nguyen, Jimmy
Fazio, Sarina A.
Johnson, Michael A.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Chuah, Chen-Nee
Adams, Jason Y.
author_facet Rehm, Gregory B.
Cortés-Puch, Irene
Kuhn, Brooks T.
Nguyen, Jimmy
Fazio, Sarina A.
Johnson, Michael A.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Chuah, Chen-Nee
Adams, Jason Y.
author_sort Rehm, Gregory B.
collection PubMed
description To develop and characterize a machine learning algorithm to discriminate acute respiratory distress syndrome from other causes of respiratory failure using only ventilator waveform data. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center ICU. PATIENTS: Adults admitted to the ICU requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, including 50 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and 50 patients with primary indications for mechanical ventilation other than hypoxemic respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pressure and flow time series data from mechanical ventilation during the first 24-hours after meeting acute respiratory distress syndrome criteria (or first 24-hr of mechanical ventilation for non-acute respiratory distress syndrome patients) were processed to extract nine physiologic features. A random forest machine learning algorithm was trained to discriminate between the patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Analyses examined performance when the model was trained using data from the first 24 hours and tested using withheld data from either the first 24 hours (24/24 model) or 6 hours (24/6 model). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.88, 0.90, 0.71, 0.77, and 0.90 (24/24); and 0.89, 0.90, 0.75, 0.83, and 0.83 (24/6). CONCLUSIONS: Use of machine learning and physiologic information derived from raw ventilator waveform data may enable acute respiratory distress syndrome screening at early time points after intubation. This approach, combined with traditional diagnostic criteria, could improve timely acute respiratory distress syndrome recognition and enable automated clinical decision support, especially in settings with limited availability of conventional diagnostic tests and electronic health records.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7803688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78036882021-01-14 Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data Rehm, Gregory B. Cortés-Puch, Irene Kuhn, Brooks T. Nguyen, Jimmy Fazio, Sarina A. Johnson, Michael A. Anderson, Nicholas R. Chuah, Chen-Nee Adams, Jason Y. Crit Care Explor Predictive Modeling Report To develop and characterize a machine learning algorithm to discriminate acute respiratory distress syndrome from other causes of respiratory failure using only ventilator waveform data. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center ICU. PATIENTS: Adults admitted to the ICU requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, including 50 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and 50 patients with primary indications for mechanical ventilation other than hypoxemic respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pressure and flow time series data from mechanical ventilation during the first 24-hours after meeting acute respiratory distress syndrome criteria (or first 24-hr of mechanical ventilation for non-acute respiratory distress syndrome patients) were processed to extract nine physiologic features. A random forest machine learning algorithm was trained to discriminate between the patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Analyses examined performance when the model was trained using data from the first 24 hours and tested using withheld data from either the first 24 hours (24/24 model) or 6 hours (24/6 model). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.88, 0.90, 0.71, 0.77, and 0.90 (24/24); and 0.89, 0.90, 0.75, 0.83, and 0.83 (24/6). CONCLUSIONS: Use of machine learning and physiologic information derived from raw ventilator waveform data may enable acute respiratory distress syndrome screening at early time points after intubation. This approach, combined with traditional diagnostic criteria, could improve timely acute respiratory distress syndrome recognition and enable automated clinical decision support, especially in settings with limited availability of conventional diagnostic tests and electronic health records. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7803688/ /pubmed/33458681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000313 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Predictive Modeling Report
Rehm, Gregory B.
Cortés-Puch, Irene
Kuhn, Brooks T.
Nguyen, Jimmy
Fazio, Sarina A.
Johnson, Michael A.
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Chuah, Chen-Nee
Adams, Jason Y.
Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data
title Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data
title_full Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data
title_fullStr Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data
title_full_unstemmed Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data
title_short Use of Machine Learning to Screen for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Raw Ventilator Waveform Data
title_sort use of machine learning to screen for acute respiratory distress syndrome using raw ventilator waveform data
topic Predictive Modeling Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000313
work_keys_str_mv AT rehmgregoryb useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT cortespuchirene useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT kuhnbrookst useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT nguyenjimmy useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT faziosarinaa useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT johnsonmichaela useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT andersonnicholasr useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT chuahchennee useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata
AT adamsjasony useofmachinelearningtoscreenforacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeusingrawventilatorwaveformdata