Cargando…

Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms

Endovascular management of small visceral artery aneurysms is an established treatment with satisfactory outcomes. However, when size exceeds 5 cm visceral aneurysms are considered as “giant” (giant visceral artery aneurysms or GVAAs) and management is significantly more complex. Between August 2007...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tipaldi, Marcello Andrea, Krokidis, Miltiadis, Orgera, Gianluigi, Pignatelli, Matteo, Ronconi, Edoardo, Laurino, Florindo, Laghi, Andrea, Rossi, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80150-2
_version_ 1783636017976180736
author Tipaldi, Marcello Andrea
Krokidis, Miltiadis
Orgera, Gianluigi
Pignatelli, Matteo
Ronconi, Edoardo
Laurino, Florindo
Laghi, Andrea
Rossi, Michele
author_facet Tipaldi, Marcello Andrea
Krokidis, Miltiadis
Orgera, Gianluigi
Pignatelli, Matteo
Ronconi, Edoardo
Laurino, Florindo
Laghi, Andrea
Rossi, Michele
author_sort Tipaldi, Marcello Andrea
collection PubMed
description Endovascular management of small visceral artery aneurysms is an established treatment with satisfactory outcomes. However, when size exceeds 5 cm visceral aneurysms are considered as “giant” (giant visceral artery aneurysms or GVAAs) and management is significantly more complex. Between August 2007 and June 2019 eleven cases of GVAAs that were endovascularly treated were retrospectively reviewed and included in this single center study. Mean size was 80 mm (± 26.3 mm) x 46 mm (+ \-11.8 mm). Nine of the lesions were true aneurysms, and two were pseudoaneurysms. In 8 patients, the lesion was causing compression symptoms in the surrounding organs, one patient developed a contained rupture while 2 patients were completely asymptomatic. However, all patients were hemodynamically stable at the time of treatment. Technical success was defined as immediate complete exclusion of the aneurysmal sac, and clinical success as complete relief from clinical symptoms. Follow-up was performed with CT angiography, ultrasound and clinical examination. Mean follow-up was 45 months (range 6–84). Technical and clinical success were both 91%. Complications were one lack of control of contained rupture that was subsequently operated, one case of self-limiting non-target spleen embolization and one case of splenic abscess. Three patients died, one due to the contained rupture 15 days after procedure, the other two for other causes and occurred during the long-term follow-up. This series suggests that endovascular treatment of giant visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneuryms is a valid minimally invasive solution with very satisfactory immediate and long-term outcomes unless the aneurysm is already ruptured. A variety of endovascular tools may be required for successful treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7803780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78037802021-01-13 Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms Tipaldi, Marcello Andrea Krokidis, Miltiadis Orgera, Gianluigi Pignatelli, Matteo Ronconi, Edoardo Laurino, Florindo Laghi, Andrea Rossi, Michele Sci Rep Article Endovascular management of small visceral artery aneurysms is an established treatment with satisfactory outcomes. However, when size exceeds 5 cm visceral aneurysms are considered as “giant” (giant visceral artery aneurysms or GVAAs) and management is significantly more complex. Between August 2007 and June 2019 eleven cases of GVAAs that were endovascularly treated were retrospectively reviewed and included in this single center study. Mean size was 80 mm (± 26.3 mm) x 46 mm (+ \-11.8 mm). Nine of the lesions were true aneurysms, and two were pseudoaneurysms. In 8 patients, the lesion was causing compression symptoms in the surrounding organs, one patient developed a contained rupture while 2 patients were completely asymptomatic. However, all patients were hemodynamically stable at the time of treatment. Technical success was defined as immediate complete exclusion of the aneurysmal sac, and clinical success as complete relief from clinical symptoms. Follow-up was performed with CT angiography, ultrasound and clinical examination. Mean follow-up was 45 months (range 6–84). Technical and clinical success were both 91%. Complications were one lack of control of contained rupture that was subsequently operated, one case of self-limiting non-target spleen embolization and one case of splenic abscess. Three patients died, one due to the contained rupture 15 days after procedure, the other two for other causes and occurred during the long-term follow-up. This series suggests that endovascular treatment of giant visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneuryms is a valid minimally invasive solution with very satisfactory immediate and long-term outcomes unless the aneurysm is already ruptured. A variety of endovascular tools may be required for successful treatment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7803780/ /pubmed/33436829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80150-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tipaldi, Marcello Andrea
Krokidis, Miltiadis
Orgera, Gianluigi
Pignatelli, Matteo
Ronconi, Edoardo
Laurino, Florindo
Laghi, Andrea
Rossi, Michele
Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms
title Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms
title_full Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms
title_fullStr Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms
title_short Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms
title_sort endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80150-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tipaldimarcelloandrea endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms
AT krokidismiltiadis endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms
AT orgeragianluigi endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms
AT pignatellimatteo endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms
AT ronconiedoardo endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms
AT laurinoflorindo endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms
AT laghiandrea endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms
AT rossimichele endovascularmanagementofgiantvisceralarteryaneurysms