Cargando…

Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods

Acoustic cavitation and sonochemical reactions play a significant role in various applications of ultrasound. A number of dosimetry methods are in practice to quantify the amount of radicals generated by acoustic cavitation. In this study, hydroxyl radical (OH•) yields measured by Weissler, Fricke a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajamma, Devika Bhai, Anandan, Sambandam, Yusof, Nor Saadah Mohd, Pollet, Bruno G., Ashokkumar, Muthupandian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105413
_version_ 1783636021326381056
author Rajamma, Devika Bhai
Anandan, Sambandam
Yusof, Nor Saadah Mohd
Pollet, Bruno G.
Ashokkumar, Muthupandian
author_facet Rajamma, Devika Bhai
Anandan, Sambandam
Yusof, Nor Saadah Mohd
Pollet, Bruno G.
Ashokkumar, Muthupandian
author_sort Rajamma, Devika Bhai
collection PubMed
description Acoustic cavitation and sonochemical reactions play a significant role in various applications of ultrasound. A number of dosimetry methods are in practice to quantify the amount of radicals generated by acoustic cavitation. In this study, hydroxyl radical (OH•) yields measured by Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid dosimetry methods have been compared to evaluate the validities of these methods using a 490 kHz high frequency sonochemical reactor. The OH• yields obtained after 5 min sonication at 490 kHz from Weissler and Fricke dosimetries were 200 µM and 289 µM, respectively. Whereas, the OH• yield was found to be very low (8 µM) when terephthalic acid dosimetry was used under similar experimental conditions. While the results agree with those reported by Iida et al. (Microchem. J., 80 (2005) 159), further mechanistic details and interfering reactions have been discussed in this study. For example, the amount of OH• determined by the Weissler and Fricke methods may have some uncertainty due to the formation of HO(2)• in the presence of oxygen. In order to account for the major discrepancy observed with the terephthalic acid dosimetry method, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was performed, where two additional products other than 2-hydroxy terephthalic acid were observed. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis showed the formation of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid as one of the by-products along with other unidentified by-products. Despite the formation of additional products consuming OH•, the reason for a very low OH• yield obtained by this dosimetry could not be justified, questioning the applicability of this method, which has been used to quantify OH• yields generated not only by acoustic cavitation, but also by other processes such as γ-radiolysis. The authors are hoping that this Opinion Paper may initiate further discussion among researchers working in sonochemistry area that could help resolve the uncertainties around using these dosimetry methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7803795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78037952021-01-22 Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods Rajamma, Devika Bhai Anandan, Sambandam Yusof, Nor Saadah Mohd Pollet, Bruno G. Ashokkumar, Muthupandian Ultrason Sonochem Original Research Article Acoustic cavitation and sonochemical reactions play a significant role in various applications of ultrasound. A number of dosimetry methods are in practice to quantify the amount of radicals generated by acoustic cavitation. In this study, hydroxyl radical (OH•) yields measured by Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid dosimetry methods have been compared to evaluate the validities of these methods using a 490 kHz high frequency sonochemical reactor. The OH• yields obtained after 5 min sonication at 490 kHz from Weissler and Fricke dosimetries were 200 µM and 289 µM, respectively. Whereas, the OH• yield was found to be very low (8 µM) when terephthalic acid dosimetry was used under similar experimental conditions. While the results agree with those reported by Iida et al. (Microchem. J., 80 (2005) 159), further mechanistic details and interfering reactions have been discussed in this study. For example, the amount of OH• determined by the Weissler and Fricke methods may have some uncertainty due to the formation of HO(2)• in the presence of oxygen. In order to account for the major discrepancy observed with the terephthalic acid dosimetry method, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was performed, where two additional products other than 2-hydroxy terephthalic acid were observed. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis showed the formation of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid as one of the by-products along with other unidentified by-products. Despite the formation of additional products consuming OH•, the reason for a very low OH• yield obtained by this dosimetry could not be justified, questioning the applicability of this method, which has been used to quantify OH• yields generated not only by acoustic cavitation, but also by other processes such as γ-radiolysis. The authors are hoping that this Opinion Paper may initiate further discussion among researchers working in sonochemistry area that could help resolve the uncertainties around using these dosimetry methods. Elsevier 2020-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7803795/ /pubmed/33338865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105413 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Rajamma, Devika Bhai
Anandan, Sambandam
Yusof, Nor Saadah Mohd
Pollet, Bruno G.
Ashokkumar, Muthupandian
Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods
title Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods
title_full Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods
title_fullStr Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods
title_full_unstemmed Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods
title_short Sonochemical dosimetry: A comparative study of Weissler, Fricke and terephthalic acid methods
title_sort sonochemical dosimetry: a comparative study of weissler, fricke and terephthalic acid methods
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105413
work_keys_str_mv AT rajammadevikabhai sonochemicaldosimetryacomparativestudyofweisslerfrickeandterephthalicacidmethods
AT anandansambandam sonochemicaldosimetryacomparativestudyofweisslerfrickeandterephthalicacidmethods
AT yusofnorsaadahmohd sonochemicaldosimetryacomparativestudyofweisslerfrickeandterephthalicacidmethods
AT polletbrunog sonochemicaldosimetryacomparativestudyofweisslerfrickeandterephthalicacidmethods
AT ashokkumarmuthupandian sonochemicaldosimetryacomparativestudyofweisslerfrickeandterephthalicacidmethods