Cargando…

Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites

OBJECTIVE: Radial endothelial dysfunction may occur after transradial coronary angiography (CAG). This study aimed to make a comparative evaluation of the radial endothelial functions before and after catheterization between three different radial access sites: left radial (LR) artery, left distal r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soydan, Elton, Kış, Mehmet, Akın, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Society of Cardiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382049
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.59085
_version_ 1783636022275342336
author Soydan, Elton
Kış, Mehmet
Akın, Mustafa
author_facet Soydan, Elton
Kış, Mehmet
Akın, Mustafa
author_sort Soydan, Elton
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Radial endothelial dysfunction may occur after transradial coronary angiography (CAG). This study aimed to make a comparative evaluation of the radial endothelial functions before and after catheterization between three different radial access sites: left radial (LR) artery, left distal radial (LDR) artery, and right radial (RR) artery. METHODS: Seventy patients scheduled for elective transradial CAG and intervention from September 6, 2017 to March 6, 2018 were consecutively enrolled. Radial artery endothelial functions of the catheterization arm were measured by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) upon admission, at 24 hours, and 2 months following the procedure. RESULTS: LR access was used in 17 patients, whereas the LDR and the RR access were used in 27 and 26 patients, respectively. Basal radial diameters and FMD median values measured on the intervention arm were found to be similar between groups (LR 3.04±0.29 mm, 13.33%; LDR 2.79±0.31 mm; 13.64%; RR 2.74±0.29 mm; 12.52%, p=0.952). The radial vasodilation percentage change expressed as median decreased in all groups 24 hours after the procedure; however, the one with the LDR access was found to be significantly higher than with the LR (9.7% vs. 6.25% p=0.013) and the RR access (9.7% vs. 3.39 p<0.001). A partial recovery of endothelial functions was seen at 2 months after the procedure, approximating to basal values (11.11%; 12%; 10.62%, p=0.079, respectively). CONCLUSION: Radial artery functions deteriorate early after transradial catheterization. The LDR access seems safer than the other conventional radial access sites in terms of preservation of radial endothelial functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7803799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Turkish Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78037992021-01-21 Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites Soydan, Elton Kış, Mehmet Akın, Mustafa Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: Radial endothelial dysfunction may occur after transradial coronary angiography (CAG). This study aimed to make a comparative evaluation of the radial endothelial functions before and after catheterization between three different radial access sites: left radial (LR) artery, left distal radial (LDR) artery, and right radial (RR) artery. METHODS: Seventy patients scheduled for elective transradial CAG and intervention from September 6, 2017 to March 6, 2018 were consecutively enrolled. Radial artery endothelial functions of the catheterization arm were measured by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) upon admission, at 24 hours, and 2 months following the procedure. RESULTS: LR access was used in 17 patients, whereas the LDR and the RR access were used in 27 and 26 patients, respectively. Basal radial diameters and FMD median values measured on the intervention arm were found to be similar between groups (LR 3.04±0.29 mm, 13.33%; LDR 2.79±0.31 mm; 13.64%; RR 2.74±0.29 mm; 12.52%, p=0.952). The radial vasodilation percentage change expressed as median decreased in all groups 24 hours after the procedure; however, the one with the LDR access was found to be significantly higher than with the LR (9.7% vs. 6.25% p=0.013) and the RR access (9.7% vs. 3.39 p<0.001). A partial recovery of endothelial functions was seen at 2 months after the procedure, approximating to basal values (11.11%; 12%; 10.62%, p=0.079, respectively). CONCLUSION: Radial artery functions deteriorate early after transradial catheterization. The LDR access seems safer than the other conventional radial access sites in terms of preservation of radial endothelial functions. Turkish Society of Cardiology 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7803799/ /pubmed/33382049 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.59085 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Soydan, Elton
Kış, Mehmet
Akın, Mustafa
Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
title Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
title_full Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
title_fullStr Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
title_short Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
title_sort evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382049
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.59085
work_keys_str_mv AT soydanelton evaluationofradialarteryendothelialfunctionsintransradialcoronaryangiographyaccordingtodifferentradialaccesssites
AT kısmehmet evaluationofradialarteryendothelialfunctionsintransradialcoronaryangiographyaccordingtodifferentradialaccesssites
AT akınmustafa evaluationofradialarteryendothelialfunctionsintransradialcoronaryangiographyaccordingtodifferentradialaccesssites