Cargando…

Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species

Alone among Western nations, the United States has a two-tier system for welfare protections for vertebrate animals in research. Because its Animal Welfare Act (AWA) excludes laboratory rats and mice (RM), government veterinarians do not inspect RM laboratories and RM numbers are only partially repo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Carbone, Larry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79961-0
_version_ 1783636058179633152
author Carbone, Larry
author_facet Carbone, Larry
author_sort Carbone, Larry
collection PubMed
description Alone among Western nations, the United States has a two-tier system for welfare protections for vertebrate animals in research. Because its Animal Welfare Act (AWA) excludes laboratory rats and mice (RM), government veterinarians do not inspect RM laboratories and RM numbers are only partially reported to government agencies(1). Without transparent statistics, it is impossible to track efforts to reduce or replace these sentient animals’ use or to project government resources needed if AWA coverage were expanded to include them. I obtained annual RM usage data from 16 large American institutions and compared RM numbers to institutions’ legally-required reports of their AWA-covered mammals. RM comprised approximately 99.3% of mammals at these representative institutions. Extrapolating from 780,070 AWA-covered mammals in 2017–18, I estimate that 111.5 million rats and mice were used per year in this period. If the same proportion of RM undergo painful procedures as are publicly reported for AWA-covered animals, then some 44.5 million mice and rats underwent potentially painful experiments. These data inform the questions of whether the AWA needs an update to cover RM, or whether the NIH should increase transparency of funded animal research. These figures can benchmark progress in reducing animal numbers in general and more specifically, in painful experiments. This estimate is higher than any others available, reflecting the challenges of obtaining statistics without consistent and transparent institutional reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7803966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78039662021-01-13 Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species Carbone, Larry Sci Rep Article Alone among Western nations, the United States has a two-tier system for welfare protections for vertebrate animals in research. Because its Animal Welfare Act (AWA) excludes laboratory rats and mice (RM), government veterinarians do not inspect RM laboratories and RM numbers are only partially reported to government agencies(1). Without transparent statistics, it is impossible to track efforts to reduce or replace these sentient animals’ use or to project government resources needed if AWA coverage were expanded to include them. I obtained annual RM usage data from 16 large American institutions and compared RM numbers to institutions’ legally-required reports of their AWA-covered mammals. RM comprised approximately 99.3% of mammals at these representative institutions. Extrapolating from 780,070 AWA-covered mammals in 2017–18, I estimate that 111.5 million rats and mice were used per year in this period. If the same proportion of RM undergo painful procedures as are publicly reported for AWA-covered animals, then some 44.5 million mice and rats underwent potentially painful experiments. These data inform the questions of whether the AWA needs an update to cover RM, or whether the NIH should increase transparency of funded animal research. These figures can benchmark progress in reducing animal numbers in general and more specifically, in painful experiments. This estimate is higher than any others available, reflecting the challenges of obtaining statistics without consistent and transparent institutional reports. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7803966/ /pubmed/33436799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79961-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Carbone, Larry
Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species
title Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species
title_full Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species
title_fullStr Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species
title_full_unstemmed Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species
title_short Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species
title_sort estimating mouse and rat use in american laboratories by extrapolation from animal welfare act-regulated species
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79961-0
work_keys_str_mv AT carbonelarry estimatingmouseandratuseinamericanlaboratoriesbyextrapolationfromanimalwelfareactregulatedspecies