Cargando…

Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Fistula-in-ano is one of the most common benign anal conditions in daily surgical practice.The goals in the treatment of an anal fistula are to eradicate sepsis and to eliminate the primary fistula opening, any associated tracts, and any secondary openings without a change in continence....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Sebai, Olfat I., Ammar, Mohammed S., Mohamed, Samy H., El Balshy, Mohammed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7804334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.014
_version_ 1783636141352681472
author Al Sebai, Olfat I.
Ammar, Mohammed S.
Mohamed, Samy H.
El Balshy, Mohammed A.
author_facet Al Sebai, Olfat I.
Ammar, Mohammed S.
Mohamed, Samy H.
El Balshy, Mohammed A.
author_sort Al Sebai, Olfat I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fistula-in-ano is one of the most common benign anal conditions in daily surgical practice.The goals in the treatment of an anal fistula are to eradicate sepsis and to eliminate the primary fistula opening, any associated tracts, and any secondary openings without a change in continence. Conventional fistulotomy (lay open of the fistula tract) is a commonly used procedure and is still relied on by the majority of surgeons as the gold standard for the treatment of perianal fistula. Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) is a new sphincter-preserving technique for the treatment of anal fistula. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of open fistulotomy and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure based on its post-operative outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Present study is A prospective randomized controlled trial which included 30 patients presented with low transsphincteric perianal fistula 27 (90%) males and 3 (10%) females divided into two groups each group consisted of 15 patients. Group, I subjected to inter sphincteric ligation of perianal fistula (LIFT) procedure. Group II patients subjected to conventional fistulotomy. The study lasts 2 years from May 2017 to May 2019 with Follow up for 6 months duration. Operative time in our study was significantly higher in group (I) Managed by LIFT with a mean of 32.53 min than group (II) managed by fistulotomy with a mean of 20.87mins. Wound healing was faster in a group (I) managed by LIFT than group (II) managed by fistulotomy, as the mean time for complete wound healing was (4.53) weeks after LIFT and (5.67) weeks after fistulotomy. RESULTS: There was no case of incontinence after performing the LIFT technique in all our patients in group I. there were 2 cases of incontinence to gases only after fistulotomy in group II. The healing rate after LIFT was 80% (12/15 patients). The healing rate after fistulotomy was 93.3% (14/15 patients). CONCLUSION: LIFT procedure is an effective and preferred sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano with shorter healing time and lower incidence of postoperative anal incontinence, as compared to open fistulotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7804334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78043342021-01-22 Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial Al Sebai, Olfat I. Ammar, Mohammed S. Mohamed, Samy H. El Balshy, Mohammed A. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: Fistula-in-ano is one of the most common benign anal conditions in daily surgical practice.The goals in the treatment of an anal fistula are to eradicate sepsis and to eliminate the primary fistula opening, any associated tracts, and any secondary openings without a change in continence. Conventional fistulotomy (lay open of the fistula tract) is a commonly used procedure and is still relied on by the majority of surgeons as the gold standard for the treatment of perianal fistula. Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) is a new sphincter-preserving technique for the treatment of anal fistula. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of open fistulotomy and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure based on its post-operative outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Present study is A prospective randomized controlled trial which included 30 patients presented with low transsphincteric perianal fistula 27 (90%) males and 3 (10%) females divided into two groups each group consisted of 15 patients. Group, I subjected to inter sphincteric ligation of perianal fistula (LIFT) procedure. Group II patients subjected to conventional fistulotomy. The study lasts 2 years from May 2017 to May 2019 with Follow up for 6 months duration. Operative time in our study was significantly higher in group (I) Managed by LIFT with a mean of 32.53 min than group (II) managed by fistulotomy with a mean of 20.87mins. Wound healing was faster in a group (I) managed by LIFT than group (II) managed by fistulotomy, as the mean time for complete wound healing was (4.53) weeks after LIFT and (5.67) weeks after fistulotomy. RESULTS: There was no case of incontinence after performing the LIFT technique in all our patients in group I. there were 2 cases of incontinence to gases only after fistulotomy in group II. The healing rate after LIFT was 80% (12/15 patients). The healing rate after fistulotomy was 93.3% (14/15 patients). CONCLUSION: LIFT procedure is an effective and preferred sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano with shorter healing time and lower incidence of postoperative anal incontinence, as compared to open fistulotomy. Elsevier 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7804334/ /pubmed/33489105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.014 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Al Sebai, Olfat I.
Ammar, Mohammed S.
Mohamed, Samy H.
El Balshy, Mohammed A.
Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative study between intersphinecteric ligation of perianal fistula versus conventional fistulotomy with or without seton in the treatment of perianal fistula: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7804334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.014
work_keys_str_mv AT alsebaiolfati comparativestudybetweenintersphinectericligationofperianalfistulaversusconventionalfistulotomywithorwithoutsetoninthetreatmentofperianalfistulaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ammarmohammeds comparativestudybetweenintersphinectericligationofperianalfistulaversusconventionalfistulotomywithorwithoutsetoninthetreatmentofperianalfistulaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohamedsamyh comparativestudybetweenintersphinectericligationofperianalfistulaversusconventionalfistulotomywithorwithoutsetoninthetreatmentofperianalfistulaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elbalshymohammeda comparativestudybetweenintersphinectericligationofperianalfistulaversusconventionalfistulotomywithorwithoutsetoninthetreatmentofperianalfistulaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial