Cargando…

A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is ‘a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines’. The purpose of this exercis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fellenor, John, Britten, Nicky, Courtenay, Molly, Payne, Rupert A., Valderas, Jose, Denholm, Rachel, Duncan, Polly, McCahon, Deborah, Tatnell, Lynn, Fitzgerald, Richard, Warmoth, Krystal, Gillespie, David, Turner, Katrina, Watson, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7804576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5
_version_ 1783636182944448512
author Fellenor, John
Britten, Nicky
Courtenay, Molly
Payne, Rupert A.
Valderas, Jose
Denholm, Rachel
Duncan, Polly
McCahon, Deborah
Tatnell, Lynn
Fitzgerald, Richard
Warmoth, Krystal
Gillespie, David
Turner, Katrina
Watson, Margaret
author_facet Fellenor, John
Britten, Nicky
Courtenay, Molly
Payne, Rupert A.
Valderas, Jose
Denholm, Rachel
Duncan, Polly
McCahon, Deborah
Tatnell, Lynn
Fitzgerald, Richard
Warmoth, Krystal
Gillespie, David
Turner, Katrina
Watson, Margaret
author_sort Fellenor, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is ‘a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines’. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach. METHODS: A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3). RESULTS: In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: ‘Patient Concerns’ [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], ‘Polypharmacy’ [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], ‘Non-Medical Prescribing’ [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and ‘Deprescribing’ [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7804576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78045762021-01-13 A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation Fellenor, John Britten, Nicky Courtenay, Molly Payne, Rupert A. Valderas, Jose Denholm, Rachel Duncan, Polly McCahon, Deborah Tatnell, Lynn Fitzgerald, Richard Warmoth, Krystal Gillespie, David Turner, Katrina Watson, Margaret BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is ‘a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines’. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach. METHODS: A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3). RESULTS: In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: ‘Patient Concerns’ [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], ‘Polypharmacy’ [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], ‘Non-Medical Prescribing’ [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and ‘Deprescribing’ [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5. BioMed Central 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7804576/ /pubmed/33441135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fellenor, John
Britten, Nicky
Courtenay, Molly
Payne, Rupert A.
Valderas, Jose
Denholm, Rachel
Duncan, Polly
McCahon, Deborah
Tatnell, Lynn
Fitzgerald, Richard
Warmoth, Krystal
Gillespie, David
Turner, Katrina
Watson, Margaret
A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
title A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
title_full A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
title_fullStr A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
title_full_unstemmed A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
title_short A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
title_sort multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7804576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fellenorjohn amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT brittennicky amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT courtenaymolly amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT payneruperta amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT valderasjose amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT denholmrachel amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT duncanpolly amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT mccahondeborah amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT tatnelllynn amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT fitzgeraldrichard amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT warmothkrystal amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT gillespiedavid amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT turnerkatrina amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT watsonmargaret amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT fellenorjohn multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT brittennicky multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT courtenaymolly multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT payneruperta multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT valderasjose multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT denholmrachel multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT duncanpolly multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT mccahondeborah multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT tatnelllynn multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT fitzgeraldrichard multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT warmothkrystal multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT gillespiedavid multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT turnerkatrina multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation
AT watsonmargaret multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation