Cargando…
A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is ‘a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines’. The purpose of this exercis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7804576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5 |
_version_ | 1783636182944448512 |
---|---|
author | Fellenor, John Britten, Nicky Courtenay, Molly Payne, Rupert A. Valderas, Jose Denholm, Rachel Duncan, Polly McCahon, Deborah Tatnell, Lynn Fitzgerald, Richard Warmoth, Krystal Gillespie, David Turner, Katrina Watson, Margaret |
author_facet | Fellenor, John Britten, Nicky Courtenay, Molly Payne, Rupert A. Valderas, Jose Denholm, Rachel Duncan, Polly McCahon, Deborah Tatnell, Lynn Fitzgerald, Richard Warmoth, Krystal Gillespie, David Turner, Katrina Watson, Margaret |
author_sort | Fellenor, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is ‘a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines’. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach. METHODS: A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3). RESULTS: In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: ‘Patient Concerns’ [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], ‘Polypharmacy’ [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], ‘Non-Medical Prescribing’ [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and ‘Deprescribing’ [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7804576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78045762021-01-13 A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation Fellenor, John Britten, Nicky Courtenay, Molly Payne, Rupert A. Valderas, Jose Denholm, Rachel Duncan, Polly McCahon, Deborah Tatnell, Lynn Fitzgerald, Richard Warmoth, Krystal Gillespie, David Turner, Katrina Watson, Margaret BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is ‘a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines’. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach. METHODS: A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3). RESULTS: In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: ‘Patient Concerns’ [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], ‘Polypharmacy’ [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], ‘Non-Medical Prescribing’ [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and ‘Deprescribing’ [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5. BioMed Central 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7804576/ /pubmed/33441135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fellenor, John Britten, Nicky Courtenay, Molly Payne, Rupert A. Valderas, Jose Denholm, Rachel Duncan, Polly McCahon, Deborah Tatnell, Lynn Fitzgerald, Richard Warmoth, Krystal Gillespie, David Turner, Katrina Watson, Margaret A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation |
title | A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation |
title_full | A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation |
title_fullStr | A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation |
title_short | A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation |
title_sort | multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7804576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fellenorjohn amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT brittennicky amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT courtenaymolly amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT payneruperta amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT valderasjose amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT denholmrachel amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT duncanpolly amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT mccahondeborah amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT tatnelllynn amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT fitzgeraldrichard amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT warmothkrystal amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT gillespiedavid amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT turnerkatrina amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT watsonmargaret amultistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT fellenorjohn multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT brittennicky multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT courtenaymolly multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT payneruperta multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT valderasjose multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT denholmrachel multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT duncanpolly multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT mccahondeborah multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT tatnelllynn multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT fitzgeraldrichard multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT warmothkrystal multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT gillespiedavid multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT turnerkatrina multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation AT watsonmargaret multistakeholderapproachtothecoproductionoftheresearchagendaformedicinesoptimisation |