Cargando…

Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is effective in treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but imaging assessment of response after SABR is difficult. This prospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for true pathologic complete response (pCR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Dae-Myoung, Palma, David A., Kwan, Keith, Louie, Alexander V., Malthaner, Richard, Fortin, Dalilah, Rodrigues, George B., Yaremko, Brian P., Laba, Joanna, Gaede, Stewart, Warner, Andrew, Inculet, Richard, Lee, Ting-Yim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01747-z
_version_ 1783636236372541440
author Yang, Dae-Myoung
Palma, David A.
Kwan, Keith
Louie, Alexander V.
Malthaner, Richard
Fortin, Dalilah
Rodrigues, George B.
Yaremko, Brian P.
Laba, Joanna
Gaede, Stewart
Warner, Andrew
Inculet, Richard
Lee, Ting-Yim
author_facet Yang, Dae-Myoung
Palma, David A.
Kwan, Keith
Louie, Alexander V.
Malthaner, Richard
Fortin, Dalilah
Rodrigues, George B.
Yaremko, Brian P.
Laba, Joanna
Gaede, Stewart
Warner, Andrew
Inculet, Richard
Lee, Ting-Yim
author_sort Yang, Dae-Myoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is effective in treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but imaging assessment of response after SABR is difficult. This prospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for true pathologic complete response (pCR) to SABR using imaging-based biomarkers from dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion (CTP). METHODS: Twenty-six patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SABR followed by surgical resection were included, as a pre-specified secondary analysis of a larger study. Dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET and CTP were performed pre-SABR and 8-week post. Dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET provided maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV) and kinetic parameters estimated using a previously developed flow-modified two-tissue compartment model while CTP measured blood flow, blood volume and vessel permeability surface product. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to establish a predictive model with the measured PET and CTP imaging biomarkers for predicting pCR. The model was compared to current RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1) and PERCIST (PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.0) criteria. RESULTS: RPA identified three response groups based on tumour blood volume before SABR (BV(pre-SABR)) and change in SUV(max) (ΔSUV(max)), the thresholds being BV(pre-SABR) = 9.3 mL/100 g and ΔSUV(max) = − 48.9%. The highest true pCR rate of 92% was observed in the group with BV(pre-SABR) < 9.3 mL/100 g and ΔSUV(max) < − 48.9% after SABR while the worst was observed in the group with BV(pre-SABR) ≥ 9.3 mL/100 g (0%). RPA model achieved excellent pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.92; P = 0.03). RECIST and PERCIST showed poor pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.54 and 0.58, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a predictive model based on dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion imaging that was significantly better than RECIST and PERCIST criteria to predict pCR of NSCLC to SABR. The model used BV(pre-SABR) and ΔSUV(max) which correlates to tumour microvessel density and cell proliferation, respectively and warrants validation with larger sample size studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MISSILE-NSCLC, NCT02136355 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Registered May 8, 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02136355
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7805034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78050342021-01-14 Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study Yang, Dae-Myoung Palma, David A. Kwan, Keith Louie, Alexander V. Malthaner, Richard Fortin, Dalilah Rodrigues, George B. Yaremko, Brian P. Laba, Joanna Gaede, Stewart Warner, Andrew Inculet, Richard Lee, Ting-Yim Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is effective in treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but imaging assessment of response after SABR is difficult. This prospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for true pathologic complete response (pCR) to SABR using imaging-based biomarkers from dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion (CTP). METHODS: Twenty-six patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SABR followed by surgical resection were included, as a pre-specified secondary analysis of a larger study. Dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET and CTP were performed pre-SABR and 8-week post. Dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET provided maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV) and kinetic parameters estimated using a previously developed flow-modified two-tissue compartment model while CTP measured blood flow, blood volume and vessel permeability surface product. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to establish a predictive model with the measured PET and CTP imaging biomarkers for predicting pCR. The model was compared to current RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1) and PERCIST (PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.0) criteria. RESULTS: RPA identified three response groups based on tumour blood volume before SABR (BV(pre-SABR)) and change in SUV(max) (ΔSUV(max)), the thresholds being BV(pre-SABR) = 9.3 mL/100 g and ΔSUV(max) = − 48.9%. The highest true pCR rate of 92% was observed in the group with BV(pre-SABR) < 9.3 mL/100 g and ΔSUV(max) < − 48.9% after SABR while the worst was observed in the group with BV(pre-SABR) ≥ 9.3 mL/100 g (0%). RPA model achieved excellent pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.92; P = 0.03). RECIST and PERCIST showed poor pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.54 and 0.58, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a predictive model based on dynamic [(18)F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion imaging that was significantly better than RECIST and PERCIST criteria to predict pCR of NSCLC to SABR. The model used BV(pre-SABR) and ΔSUV(max) which correlates to tumour microvessel density and cell proliferation, respectively and warrants validation with larger sample size studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MISSILE-NSCLC, NCT02136355 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Registered May 8, 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02136355 BioMed Central 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7805034/ /pubmed/33441162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01747-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Dae-Myoung
Palma, David A.
Kwan, Keith
Louie, Alexander V.
Malthaner, Richard
Fortin, Dalilah
Rodrigues, George B.
Yaremko, Brian P.
Laba, Joanna
Gaede, Stewart
Warner, Andrew
Inculet, Richard
Lee, Ting-Yim
Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
title Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
title_full Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
title_fullStr Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
title_short Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)F]FDG PET and CT perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
title_sort predicting pathological complete response (pcr) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (sabr) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [(18)f]fdg pet and ct perfusion: a prospective exploratory clinical study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01747-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yangdaemyoung predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT palmadavida predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT kwankeith predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT louiealexanderv predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT malthanerrichard predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT fortindalilah predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT rodriguesgeorgeb predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT yaremkobrianp predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT labajoanna predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT gaedestewart predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT warnerandrew predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT inculetrichard predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy
AT leetingyim predictingpathologicalcompleteresponsepcrafterstereotacticablativeradiationtherapysabroflungcancerusingquantitativedynamic18ffdgpetandctperfusionaprospectiveexploratoryclinicalstudy