Cargando…

A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is prevalent among office workers. This study evaluated the impact of an ergonomic and exercise training (EET) intervention and an ergonomic and health promotion (EHP) intervention on neck pain intensity among the All Workers and a subgroup of Neck Pain cases at baseline. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnston, Venerina, Chen, Xiaoqi, Welch, Alyssa, Sjøgaard, Gisela, Comans, Tracy A., McStea, Megan, Straker, Leon, Melloh, Markus, Pereira, Michelle, O’Leary, Shaun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03945-y
_version_ 1783636248461574144
author Johnston, Venerina
Chen, Xiaoqi
Welch, Alyssa
Sjøgaard, Gisela
Comans, Tracy A.
McStea, Megan
Straker, Leon
Melloh, Markus
Pereira, Michelle
O’Leary, Shaun
author_facet Johnston, Venerina
Chen, Xiaoqi
Welch, Alyssa
Sjøgaard, Gisela
Comans, Tracy A.
McStea, Megan
Straker, Leon
Melloh, Markus
Pereira, Michelle
O’Leary, Shaun
author_sort Johnston, Venerina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neck pain is prevalent among office workers. This study evaluated the impact of an ergonomic and exercise training (EET) intervention and an ergonomic and health promotion (EHP) intervention on neck pain intensity among the All Workers and a subgroup of Neck Pain cases at baseline. METHODS: A 12-month cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 14 public and private organisations. Office workers aged ≥18 years working ≥30 h per week (n = 740) received an individualised workstation ergonomic intervention, followed by 1:1 allocation to the EET group (neck-specific exercise training), or the EHP group (health promotion) for 12 weeks. Neck pain intensity (scale: 0–9) was recorded at baseline, 12 weeks, and 12 months. Participants with data at these three time points were included for analysis (n = 367). Intervention group differences were analysed using generalized estimating equation models on an intention-to-treat basis and adjusted for potential confounders. Subgroup analysis was performed on neck cases reporting pain ≥3 at baseline (n = 96). RESULTS: The EET group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in neck pain intensity at 12 weeks compared to the EHP group for All Workers (EET: β = − 0.53 points 95% CI: − 0.84– − 0.22 [36%] and EHP: β = − 0.17 points 95% CI: − 0.47–0.13 [10.5%], p-value = 0.02) and the Neck Cases (EET: β = − 2.32 points 95% CI: − 3.09– − 1.56 [53%] and EHP: β = − 1.75 points 95% CI: − 2.35– − 1.16 [36%], p = 0.04). Reductions in pain intensity were not maintained at 12 months with no between-group differences observed in All Workers (EET: β = − 0.18, 95% CI: − 0.53–0.16 and EHP: β = − 0.14 points 95% CI: − 0.49–0.21, p = 0.53) or Neck Cases, although in both groups an overall reduction was found (EET: β = − 1.61 points 95% CI: − 2.36– − 0.89 and EHP: β = − 1.9 points 95% CI: − 2.59– − 1.20, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: EET was more effective than EHP in reducing neck pain intensity in All Workers and Neck Cases immediately following the intervention period (12 weeks) but not at 12 months, with changes at 12 weeks reaching clinically meaningful thresholds for the Neck Cases. Findings suggest the need for continuation of exercise to maintain benefits in the longer term. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: hACTRN12612001154897 Date of Registration: 31/10/2012. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-03945-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7805092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78050922021-01-14 A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis Johnston, Venerina Chen, Xiaoqi Welch, Alyssa Sjøgaard, Gisela Comans, Tracy A. McStea, Megan Straker, Leon Melloh, Markus Pereira, Michelle O’Leary, Shaun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Neck pain is prevalent among office workers. This study evaluated the impact of an ergonomic and exercise training (EET) intervention and an ergonomic and health promotion (EHP) intervention on neck pain intensity among the All Workers and a subgroup of Neck Pain cases at baseline. METHODS: A 12-month cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 14 public and private organisations. Office workers aged ≥18 years working ≥30 h per week (n = 740) received an individualised workstation ergonomic intervention, followed by 1:1 allocation to the EET group (neck-specific exercise training), or the EHP group (health promotion) for 12 weeks. Neck pain intensity (scale: 0–9) was recorded at baseline, 12 weeks, and 12 months. Participants with data at these three time points were included for analysis (n = 367). Intervention group differences were analysed using generalized estimating equation models on an intention-to-treat basis and adjusted for potential confounders. Subgroup analysis was performed on neck cases reporting pain ≥3 at baseline (n = 96). RESULTS: The EET group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in neck pain intensity at 12 weeks compared to the EHP group for All Workers (EET: β = − 0.53 points 95% CI: − 0.84– − 0.22 [36%] and EHP: β = − 0.17 points 95% CI: − 0.47–0.13 [10.5%], p-value = 0.02) and the Neck Cases (EET: β = − 2.32 points 95% CI: − 3.09– − 1.56 [53%] and EHP: β = − 1.75 points 95% CI: − 2.35– − 1.16 [36%], p = 0.04). Reductions in pain intensity were not maintained at 12 months with no between-group differences observed in All Workers (EET: β = − 0.18, 95% CI: − 0.53–0.16 and EHP: β = − 0.14 points 95% CI: − 0.49–0.21, p = 0.53) or Neck Cases, although in both groups an overall reduction was found (EET: β = − 1.61 points 95% CI: − 2.36– − 0.89 and EHP: β = − 1.9 points 95% CI: − 2.59– − 1.20, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: EET was more effective than EHP in reducing neck pain intensity in All Workers and Neck Cases immediately following the intervention period (12 weeks) but not at 12 months, with changes at 12 weeks reaching clinically meaningful thresholds for the Neck Cases. Findings suggest the need for continuation of exercise to maintain benefits in the longer term. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: hACTRN12612001154897 Date of Registration: 31/10/2012. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-03945-y. BioMed Central 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7805092/ /pubmed/33435941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03945-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnston, Venerina
Chen, Xiaoqi
Welch, Alyssa
Sjøgaard, Gisela
Comans, Tracy A.
McStea, Megan
Straker, Leon
Melloh, Markus
Pereira, Michelle
O’Leary, Shaun
A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis
title A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis
title_full A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis
title_fullStr A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis
title_full_unstemmed A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis
title_short A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis
title_sort cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain – a secondary outcome analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33435941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03945-y
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstonvenerina aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT chenxiaoqi aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT welchalyssa aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT sjøgaardgisela aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT comanstracya aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT mcsteamegan aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT strakerleon aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT mellohmarkus aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT pereiramichelle aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT olearyshaun aclusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT johnstonvenerina clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT chenxiaoqi clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT welchalyssa clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT sjøgaardgisela clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT comanstracya clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT mcsteamegan clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT strakerleon clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT mellohmarkus clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT pereiramichelle clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis
AT olearyshaun clusterrandomizedtrialofworkplaceergonomicsandneckspecificexerciseversusergonomicsandhealthpromotionforofficeworkerstomanageneckpainasecondaryoutcomeanalysis