Cargando…
Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic procedure has inherent merits of smaller incisions, better cosmesis, less postoperative pain, and earlier recovery. In the current study, we presented our method of purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy and compared its results with that of conventional open approach. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01050-4 |
_version_ | 1783636250149781504 |
---|---|
author | Tsai, Hsin-I. Chou, Ta-Chun Yu, Ming-Chin Yeh, Chun-Nan Peng, Meng-Ting Hsieh, Chia-Hsun Su, Po-Jung Wu, Chiao-En Kuo, Yung-Chia Chiu, Chien-Chih Lee, Chao-Wei |
author_facet | Tsai, Hsin-I. Chou, Ta-Chun Yu, Ming-Chin Yeh, Chun-Nan Peng, Meng-Ting Hsieh, Chia-Hsun Su, Po-Jung Wu, Chiao-En Kuo, Yung-Chia Chiu, Chien-Chih Lee, Chao-Wei |
author_sort | Tsai, Hsin-I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic procedure has inherent merits of smaller incisions, better cosmesis, less postoperative pain, and earlier recovery. In the current study, we presented our method of purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy and compared its results with that of conventional open approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our patients from 2012 to 2019 who had received either laparoscopic jejunostomy (LJ, n = 29) or open ones (OJ, n = 94) in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou. Peri-operative data and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: In the current study, we employed 3-0 Vicryl, instead of V-loc barbed sutures, for laparoscopic jejunostomy. The mean operative duration of LJ group was about 30 min longer than the OJ group (159 ± 57.2 mins vs 128 ± 34.6 mins; P = 0.001). There were no intraoperative complications reported in both groups. The patients in the LJ group suffered significantly less postoperative pain than in the OJ group (mean NRS 2.03 ± 0.9 vs. 2.79 ± 1.2; P = 0.002). The majority of patients in both groups received early enteral nutrition (< 48 h) after the operation (86.2% vs. 74.5%; P = 0.143). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy is a safe and feasible procedure with less postoperative pain and excellent postoperative outcome. It also provides surgeons opportunities to enhance intracorporeal suture techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7805100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78051002021-01-14 Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention Tsai, Hsin-I. Chou, Ta-Chun Yu, Ming-Chin Yeh, Chun-Nan Peng, Meng-Ting Hsieh, Chia-Hsun Su, Po-Jung Wu, Chiao-En Kuo, Yung-Chia Chiu, Chien-Chih Lee, Chao-Wei BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic procedure has inherent merits of smaller incisions, better cosmesis, less postoperative pain, and earlier recovery. In the current study, we presented our method of purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy and compared its results with that of conventional open approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our patients from 2012 to 2019 who had received either laparoscopic jejunostomy (LJ, n = 29) or open ones (OJ, n = 94) in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou. Peri-operative data and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: In the current study, we employed 3-0 Vicryl, instead of V-loc barbed sutures, for laparoscopic jejunostomy. The mean operative duration of LJ group was about 30 min longer than the OJ group (159 ± 57.2 mins vs 128 ± 34.6 mins; P = 0.001). There were no intraoperative complications reported in both groups. The patients in the LJ group suffered significantly less postoperative pain than in the OJ group (mean NRS 2.03 ± 0.9 vs. 2.79 ± 1.2; P = 0.002). The majority of patients in both groups received early enteral nutrition (< 48 h) after the operation (86.2% vs. 74.5%; P = 0.143). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy is a safe and feasible procedure with less postoperative pain and excellent postoperative outcome. It also provides surgeons opportunities to enhance intracorporeal suture techniques. BioMed Central 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7805100/ /pubmed/33441134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01050-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tsai, Hsin-I. Chou, Ta-Chun Yu, Ming-Chin Yeh, Chun-Nan Peng, Meng-Ting Hsieh, Chia-Hsun Su, Po-Jung Wu, Chiao-En Kuo, Yung-Chia Chiu, Chien-Chih Lee, Chao-Wei Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention |
title | Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention |
title_full | Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention |
title_fullStr | Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention |
title_short | Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention |
title_sort | purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33441134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01050-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaihsini purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT choutachun purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT yumingchin purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT yehchunnan purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT pengmengting purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT hsiehchiahsun purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT supojung purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT wuchiaoen purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT kuoyungchia purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT chiuchienchih purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention AT leechaowei purelylaparoscopicfeedingjejunostomyaprocedurewhichdeservesmoreattention |