Cargando…

Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study

BACKGROUND: Increasing the efficiency of the biogas production process is possible by modifying the technological installations of the biogas plant. In this study, specific solutions based on a mathematical model that lead to favorable results were proposed. Three configurations were considered: cla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Postawa, Karol, Szczygieł, Jerzy, Kułażyński, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01864-z
_version_ 1783636273461723136
author Postawa, Karol
Szczygieł, Jerzy
Kułażyński, Marek
author_facet Postawa, Karol
Szczygieł, Jerzy
Kułażyński, Marek
author_sort Postawa, Karol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing the efficiency of the biogas production process is possible by modifying the technological installations of the biogas plant. In this study, specific solutions based on a mathematical model that lead to favorable results were proposed. Three configurations were considered: classical anaerobic digestion (AD) and its two modifications, two-phase AD (TPAD) and autogenerative high-pressure digestion (AHPD). The model has been validated based on measurements from a biogas plant located in Poland. Afterward, the TPAD and AHPD concepts were numerically tested for the same volume and feeding conditions. RESULTS: The TPAD system increased the overall biogas production from 9.06 to 9.59%, depending on the feedstock composition, while the content of methane was slightly lower in the whole production chain. On the other hand, the AHPD provided the best purity of the produced fuel, in which a methane content value of 82.13% was reached. At the same time, the overpressure leads to a decrease of around 7.5% in the volumetric production efficiency. The study indicated that the dilution of maize silage with pig manure, instead of water, can have significant benefits in the selected configurations. The content of pig slurry strengthens the impact of the selected process modifications—in the first case, by increasing the production efficiency, and in the second, by improving the methane content in the biogas. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed mathematical model of the AD process proved to be a valuable tool for the description and design of biogas plant. The analysis shows that the overall impact of the presented process modifications is mutually opposite. The feedstock composition has a moderate and unsteady impact on the production profile, in the tested modifications. The dilution with pig manure, instead of water, leads to a slightly better efficiency in the classical configuration. For the TPAD process, the trend is very similar, but the AHPD biogas plant indicates a reverse tendency. Overall, the recommendation from this article is to use the AHPD concept if the composition of the biogas is the most important. In the case in which the performance is the most important factor, it is favorable to use the TPAD configuration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7805208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78052082021-01-14 Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study Postawa, Karol Szczygieł, Jerzy Kułażyński, Marek Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Increasing the efficiency of the biogas production process is possible by modifying the technological installations of the biogas plant. In this study, specific solutions based on a mathematical model that lead to favorable results were proposed. Three configurations were considered: classical anaerobic digestion (AD) and its two modifications, two-phase AD (TPAD) and autogenerative high-pressure digestion (AHPD). The model has been validated based on measurements from a biogas plant located in Poland. Afterward, the TPAD and AHPD concepts were numerically tested for the same volume and feeding conditions. RESULTS: The TPAD system increased the overall biogas production from 9.06 to 9.59%, depending on the feedstock composition, while the content of methane was slightly lower in the whole production chain. On the other hand, the AHPD provided the best purity of the produced fuel, in which a methane content value of 82.13% was reached. At the same time, the overpressure leads to a decrease of around 7.5% in the volumetric production efficiency. The study indicated that the dilution of maize silage with pig manure, instead of water, can have significant benefits in the selected configurations. The content of pig slurry strengthens the impact of the selected process modifications—in the first case, by increasing the production efficiency, and in the second, by improving the methane content in the biogas. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed mathematical model of the AD process proved to be a valuable tool for the description and design of biogas plant. The analysis shows that the overall impact of the presented process modifications is mutually opposite. The feedstock composition has a moderate and unsteady impact on the production profile, in the tested modifications. The dilution with pig manure, instead of water, leads to a slightly better efficiency in the classical configuration. For the TPAD process, the trend is very similar, but the AHPD biogas plant indicates a reverse tendency. Overall, the recommendation from this article is to use the AHPD concept if the composition of the biogas is the most important. In the case in which the performance is the most important factor, it is favorable to use the TPAD configuration. BioMed Central 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7805208/ /pubmed/33436022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01864-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Postawa, Karol
Szczygieł, Jerzy
Kułażyński, Marek
Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
title Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
title_full Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
title_fullStr Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
title_full_unstemmed Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
title_short Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
title_sort innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33436022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01864-z
work_keys_str_mv AT postawakarol innovationsinanaerobicdigestionamodelbasedstudy
AT szczygiełjerzy innovationsinanaerobicdigestionamodelbasedstudy
AT kułazynskimarek innovationsinanaerobicdigestionamodelbasedstudy