Cargando…

Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk

What should the best practices be for modeling zoonotic disease risks, e.g. to anticipate the next pandemic, when background assumptions are unsettled or evolving rapidly? This challenge runs deeper than one might expect, all the way into how we model the robustness of contemporary phylogenetic infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sterner, Beckett, Elliott, Steve, Upham, Nate, Franz, Nico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33439354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00366-x
_version_ 1783636283832139776
author Sterner, Beckett
Elliott, Steve
Upham, Nate
Franz, Nico
author_facet Sterner, Beckett
Elliott, Steve
Upham, Nate
Franz, Nico
author_sort Sterner, Beckett
collection PubMed
description What should the best practices be for modeling zoonotic disease risks, e.g. to anticipate the next pandemic, when background assumptions are unsettled or evolving rapidly? This challenge runs deeper than one might expect, all the way into how we model the robustness of contemporary phylogenetic inference and taxonomic classifications. Different and legitimate taxonomic assumptions can destabilize the putative objectivity of zoonotic risk assessments, thus potentially supporting inconsistent and overconfident policy decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7805256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78052562021-01-14 Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk Sterner, Beckett Elliott, Steve Upham, Nate Franz, Nico Hist Philos Life Sci Notes & Comments What should the best practices be for modeling zoonotic disease risks, e.g. to anticipate the next pandemic, when background assumptions are unsettled or evolving rapidly? This challenge runs deeper than one might expect, all the way into how we model the robustness of contemporary phylogenetic inference and taxonomic classifications. Different and legitimate taxonomic assumptions can destabilize the putative objectivity of zoonotic risk assessments, thus potentially supporting inconsistent and overconfident policy decisions. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7805256/ /pubmed/33439354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00366-x Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Notes & Comments
Sterner, Beckett
Elliott, Steve
Upham, Nate
Franz, Nico
Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk
title Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk
title_full Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk
title_fullStr Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk
title_full_unstemmed Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk
title_short Bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk
title_sort bats, objectivity, and viral spillover risk
topic Notes & Comments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33439354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00366-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sternerbeckett batsobjectivityandviralspilloverrisk
AT elliottsteve batsobjectivityandviralspilloverrisk
AT uphamnate batsobjectivityandviralspilloverrisk
AT franznico batsobjectivityandviralspilloverrisk