Cargando…

Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review

Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices are used in rehabilitation to improve patients' walking function. While there are some reports on the adverse events (AEs) and associated risks in overground exoskeletons, the risks of stationary gait trainers cannot be accurately assessed. We therefo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bessler, Jule, Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B., Schulte, Robert V., Schaake, Leendert, Prinsen, Erik C., Buurke, Jaap H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.557606
_version_ 1783636411850686464
author Bessler, Jule
Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B.
Schulte, Robert V.
Schaake, Leendert
Prinsen, Erik C.
Buurke, Jaap H.
author_facet Bessler, Jule
Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B.
Schulte, Robert V.
Schaake, Leendert
Prinsen, Erik C.
Buurke, Jaap H.
author_sort Bessler, Jule
collection PubMed
description Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices are used in rehabilitation to improve patients' walking function. While there are some reports on the adverse events (AEs) and associated risks in overground exoskeletons, the risks of stationary gait trainers cannot be accurately assessed. We therefore aimed to collect information on AEs occurring during the use of stationary gait robots and identify associated risks, as well as gaps and needs, for safe use of these devices. We searched both bibliographic and full-text literature databases for peer-reviewed articles describing the outcomes of stationary RAGT and specifically mentioning AEs. We then compiled information on the occurrence and types of AEs and on the quality of AE reporting. Based on this, we analyzed the risks of RAGT in stationary gait robots. We included 50 studies involving 985 subjects and found reports of AEs in 18 of those studies. Many of the AE reports were incomplete or did not include sufficient detail on different aspects, such as severity or patient characteristics, which hinders the precise counts of AE-related information. Over 169 device-related AEs experienced by between 79 and 124 patients were reported. Soft tissue-related AEs occurred most frequently and were mostly reported in end-effector-type devices. Musculoskeletal AEs had the second highest prevalence and occurred mainly in exoskeleton-type devices. We further identified physiological AEs including blood pressure changes that occurred in both exoskeleton-type and end-effector-type devices. Training in stationary gait robots can cause injuries or discomfort to the skin, underlying tissue, and musculoskeletal system, as well as unwanted blood pressure changes. The underlying risks for the most prevalent injury types include excessive pressure and shear at the interface between robot and human (cuffs/harness), as well as increased moments and forces applied to the musculoskeletal system likely caused by misalignments (between joint axes of robot and human). There is a need for more structured and complete recording and dissemination of AEs related to robotic gait training to increase knowledge on risks. With this information, appropriate mitigation strategies can and should be developed and implemented in RAGT devices to increase their safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7805916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78059162021-01-25 Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review Bessler, Jule Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B. Schulte, Robert V. Schaake, Leendert Prinsen, Erik C. Buurke, Jaap H. Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices are used in rehabilitation to improve patients' walking function. While there are some reports on the adverse events (AEs) and associated risks in overground exoskeletons, the risks of stationary gait trainers cannot be accurately assessed. We therefore aimed to collect information on AEs occurring during the use of stationary gait robots and identify associated risks, as well as gaps and needs, for safe use of these devices. We searched both bibliographic and full-text literature databases for peer-reviewed articles describing the outcomes of stationary RAGT and specifically mentioning AEs. We then compiled information on the occurrence and types of AEs and on the quality of AE reporting. Based on this, we analyzed the risks of RAGT in stationary gait robots. We included 50 studies involving 985 subjects and found reports of AEs in 18 of those studies. Many of the AE reports were incomplete or did not include sufficient detail on different aspects, such as severity or patient characteristics, which hinders the precise counts of AE-related information. Over 169 device-related AEs experienced by between 79 and 124 patients were reported. Soft tissue-related AEs occurred most frequently and were mostly reported in end-effector-type devices. Musculoskeletal AEs had the second highest prevalence and occurred mainly in exoskeleton-type devices. We further identified physiological AEs including blood pressure changes that occurred in both exoskeleton-type and end-effector-type devices. Training in stationary gait robots can cause injuries or discomfort to the skin, underlying tissue, and musculoskeletal system, as well as unwanted blood pressure changes. The underlying risks for the most prevalent injury types include excessive pressure and shear at the interface between robot and human (cuffs/harness), as well as increased moments and forces applied to the musculoskeletal system likely caused by misalignments (between joint axes of robot and human). There is a need for more structured and complete recording and dissemination of AEs related to robotic gait training to increase knowledge on risks. With this information, appropriate mitigation strategies can and should be developed and implemented in RAGT devices to increase their safety. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7805916/ /pubmed/33501319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.557606 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bessler, Prange-Lasonder, Schulte, Schaake, Prinsen and Buurke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Robotics and AI
Bessler, Jule
Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B.
Schulte, Robert V.
Schaake, Leendert
Prinsen, Erik C.
Buurke, Jaap H.
Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review
title Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort occurrence and type of adverse events during the use of stationary gait robots—a systematic literature review
topic Robotics and AI
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501319
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.557606
work_keys_str_mv AT besslerjule occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview
AT prangelasondergerdienkeb occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview
AT schulterobertv occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview
AT schaakeleendert occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview
AT prinsenerikc occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview
AT buurkejaaph occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview