Cargando…
Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review
Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices are used in rehabilitation to improve patients' walking function. While there are some reports on the adverse events (AEs) and associated risks in overground exoskeletons, the risks of stationary gait trainers cannot be accurately assessed. We therefo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.557606 |
_version_ | 1783636411850686464 |
---|---|
author | Bessler, Jule Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B. Schulte, Robert V. Schaake, Leendert Prinsen, Erik C. Buurke, Jaap H. |
author_facet | Bessler, Jule Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B. Schulte, Robert V. Schaake, Leendert Prinsen, Erik C. Buurke, Jaap H. |
author_sort | Bessler, Jule |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices are used in rehabilitation to improve patients' walking function. While there are some reports on the adverse events (AEs) and associated risks in overground exoskeletons, the risks of stationary gait trainers cannot be accurately assessed. We therefore aimed to collect information on AEs occurring during the use of stationary gait robots and identify associated risks, as well as gaps and needs, for safe use of these devices. We searched both bibliographic and full-text literature databases for peer-reviewed articles describing the outcomes of stationary RAGT and specifically mentioning AEs. We then compiled information on the occurrence and types of AEs and on the quality of AE reporting. Based on this, we analyzed the risks of RAGT in stationary gait robots. We included 50 studies involving 985 subjects and found reports of AEs in 18 of those studies. Many of the AE reports were incomplete or did not include sufficient detail on different aspects, such as severity or patient characteristics, which hinders the precise counts of AE-related information. Over 169 device-related AEs experienced by between 79 and 124 patients were reported. Soft tissue-related AEs occurred most frequently and were mostly reported in end-effector-type devices. Musculoskeletal AEs had the second highest prevalence and occurred mainly in exoskeleton-type devices. We further identified physiological AEs including blood pressure changes that occurred in both exoskeleton-type and end-effector-type devices. Training in stationary gait robots can cause injuries or discomfort to the skin, underlying tissue, and musculoskeletal system, as well as unwanted blood pressure changes. The underlying risks for the most prevalent injury types include excessive pressure and shear at the interface between robot and human (cuffs/harness), as well as increased moments and forces applied to the musculoskeletal system likely caused by misalignments (between joint axes of robot and human). There is a need for more structured and complete recording and dissemination of AEs related to robotic gait training to increase knowledge on risks. With this information, appropriate mitigation strategies can and should be developed and implemented in RAGT devices to increase their safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7805916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78059162021-01-25 Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review Bessler, Jule Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B. Schulte, Robert V. Schaake, Leendert Prinsen, Erik C. Buurke, Jaap H. Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) devices are used in rehabilitation to improve patients' walking function. While there are some reports on the adverse events (AEs) and associated risks in overground exoskeletons, the risks of stationary gait trainers cannot be accurately assessed. We therefore aimed to collect information on AEs occurring during the use of stationary gait robots and identify associated risks, as well as gaps and needs, for safe use of these devices. We searched both bibliographic and full-text literature databases for peer-reviewed articles describing the outcomes of stationary RAGT and specifically mentioning AEs. We then compiled information on the occurrence and types of AEs and on the quality of AE reporting. Based on this, we analyzed the risks of RAGT in stationary gait robots. We included 50 studies involving 985 subjects and found reports of AEs in 18 of those studies. Many of the AE reports were incomplete or did not include sufficient detail on different aspects, such as severity or patient characteristics, which hinders the precise counts of AE-related information. Over 169 device-related AEs experienced by between 79 and 124 patients were reported. Soft tissue-related AEs occurred most frequently and were mostly reported in end-effector-type devices. Musculoskeletal AEs had the second highest prevalence and occurred mainly in exoskeleton-type devices. We further identified physiological AEs including blood pressure changes that occurred in both exoskeleton-type and end-effector-type devices. Training in stationary gait robots can cause injuries or discomfort to the skin, underlying tissue, and musculoskeletal system, as well as unwanted blood pressure changes. The underlying risks for the most prevalent injury types include excessive pressure and shear at the interface between robot and human (cuffs/harness), as well as increased moments and forces applied to the musculoskeletal system likely caused by misalignments (between joint axes of robot and human). There is a need for more structured and complete recording and dissemination of AEs related to robotic gait training to increase knowledge on risks. With this information, appropriate mitigation strategies can and should be developed and implemented in RAGT devices to increase their safety. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7805916/ /pubmed/33501319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.557606 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bessler, Prange-Lasonder, Schulte, Schaake, Prinsen and Buurke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Bessler, Jule Prange-Lasonder, Gerdienke B. Schulte, Robert V. Schaake, Leendert Prinsen, Erik C. Buurke, Jaap H. Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review |
title | Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots—A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | occurrence and type of adverse events during the use of stationary gait robots—a systematic literature review |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.557606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT besslerjule occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview AT prangelasondergerdienkeb occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview AT schulterobertv occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview AT schaakeleendert occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview AT prinsenerikc occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview AT buurkejaaph occurrenceandtypeofadverseeventsduringtheuseofstationarygaitrobotsasystematicliteraturereview |