Cargando…

A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dey, Arindam, Billinghurst, Mark, Lindeman, Robert W., Swan, J. Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
_version_ 1783636421201887232
author Dey, Arindam
Billinghurst, Mark
Lindeman, Robert W.
Swan, J. Edward
author_facet Dey, Arindam
Billinghurst, Mark
Lindeman, Robert W.
Swan, J. Edward
author_sort Dey, Arindam
collection PubMed
description Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user studies have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We summarize the high-level contributions from each category of papers, and present examples of the most influential user studies. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. Among other things, we find that there is a growing trend toward handheld AR user studies, and that most studies are conducted in laboratory settings and do not involve pilot testing. This research will be useful for AR researchers who want to follow best practices in designing their own AR user studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7805955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78059552021-01-25 A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 Dey, Arindam Billinghurst, Mark Lindeman, Robert W. Swan, J. Edward Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user studies have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We summarize the high-level contributions from each category of papers, and present examples of the most influential user studies. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. Among other things, we find that there is a growing trend toward handheld AR user studies, and that most studies are conducted in laboratory settings and do not involve pilot testing. This research will be useful for AR researchers who want to follow best practices in designing their own AR user studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7805955/ /pubmed/33500923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037 Text en Copyright © 2018 Dey, Billinghurst, Lindeman and Swan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Robotics and AI
Dey, Arindam
Billinghurst, Mark
Lindeman, Robert W.
Swan, J. Edward
A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
title A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
title_full A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
title_short A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
title_sort systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014
topic Robotics and AI
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
work_keys_str_mv AT deyarindam asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014
AT billinghurstmark asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014
AT lindemanrobertw asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014
AT swanjedward asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014
AT deyarindam systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014
AT billinghurstmark systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014
AT lindemanrobertw systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014
AT swanjedward systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014