Cargando…
A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014
Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user stud...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037 |
_version_ | 1783636421201887232 |
---|---|
author | Dey, Arindam Billinghurst, Mark Lindeman, Robert W. Swan, J. Edward |
author_facet | Dey, Arindam Billinghurst, Mark Lindeman, Robert W. Swan, J. Edward |
author_sort | Dey, Arindam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user studies have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We summarize the high-level contributions from each category of papers, and present examples of the most influential user studies. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. Among other things, we find that there is a growing trend toward handheld AR user studies, and that most studies are conducted in laboratory settings and do not involve pilot testing. This research will be useful for AR researchers who want to follow best practices in designing their own AR user studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7805955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78059552021-01-25 A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 Dey, Arindam Billinghurst, Mark Lindeman, Robert W. Swan, J. Edward Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user studies have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We summarize the high-level contributions from each category of papers, and present examples of the most influential user studies. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. Among other things, we find that there is a growing trend toward handheld AR user studies, and that most studies are conducted in laboratory settings and do not involve pilot testing. This research will be useful for AR researchers who want to follow best practices in designing their own AR user studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7805955/ /pubmed/33500923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037 Text en Copyright © 2018 Dey, Billinghurst, Lindeman and Swan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Dey, Arindam Billinghurst, Mark Lindeman, Robert W. Swan, J. Edward A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 |
title | A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 |
title_full | A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 |
title_short | A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 |
title_sort | systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014 |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7805955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33500923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deyarindam asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 AT billinghurstmark asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 AT lindemanrobertw asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 AT swanjedward asystematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 AT deyarindam systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 AT billinghurstmark systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 AT lindemanrobertw systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 AT swanjedward systematicreviewof10yearsofaugmentedrealityusabilitystudies2005to2014 |