Cargando…

Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND: Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) is an alternative method to light microscopy (LM). However, few studies have compared the diagnostic agreement between WSI and LM, especially to grade oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variability in grading OED by th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diniz, Priscilla Barbosa, Sena-Filho, Marcondes, Graner, Karen Mendes, Mariz, Bruno Augusto Linhares Almeida, dos Reis, Leonardo Amaral, de Almeida, Oslei Paes, Jorge, Jacks
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7806346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247580
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23854
_version_ 1783636503235133440
author Diniz, Priscilla Barbosa
Sena-Filho, Marcondes
Graner, Karen Mendes
Mariz, Bruno Augusto Linhares Almeida
dos Reis, Leonardo Amaral
de Almeida, Oslei Paes
Jorge, Jacks
author_facet Diniz, Priscilla Barbosa
Sena-Filho, Marcondes
Graner, Karen Mendes
Mariz, Bruno Augusto Linhares Almeida
dos Reis, Leonardo Amaral
de Almeida, Oslei Paes
Jorge, Jacks
author_sort Diniz, Priscilla Barbosa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) is an alternative method to light microscopy (LM). However, few studies have compared the diagnostic agreement between WSI and LM, especially to grade oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variability in grading OED by the World Health Organization grading system, using WSI and conventional LM, and to investigate whether the access to clinical information, and psychologic or physical states of the pathologists could interfere with the diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: eleven experienced pathologists from seven Brazilian universities independently evaluated twenty-five OED cases. The analyses were performed in duplicate for each method, with an interval of at least 30 days, and the time consumed in each analysis was measured. Physical and psychologic states were evaluated by blood pressure levels, heart rate and two questionnaires: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Perceived Stress Scale. Clinical information was provided after the second evaluation using WSI and the pathologist could change their diagnostic decision or not. RESULTS: LM showed a higher inter-examiner agreement (k=0.53) than WSI (k=0.45) and a smaller time consumed by the pathologists (mean of 65.53 seconds compared to 91.02 seconds in WSI). In the first analysis using conventional microscopy, there was a positive correlation between kappa values and anxiety (r=0.47, p=0.02), and stress (r=0.64, p<0.01), and an inverse correlation with heart rate (r=-0.48, p=0.02). In the digital analysis, there was also a positive correlation between kappa values and anxiety (r=0.75, p<0.001). After clinical information was given, there was a slight change in 11.3% of the cases, and a great discrepancy in 1.1% of the cases, mainly increasing the OED grade. CONCLUSIONS: both microscopy systems had similar results, although LM had slightly higher kappa values, and WSI was more time consuming. Key words:Pathology, microscopy, diagnosis, leukoplakia oral, anxiety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7806346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78063462021-01-21 Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study Diniz, Priscilla Barbosa Sena-Filho, Marcondes Graner, Karen Mendes Mariz, Bruno Augusto Linhares Almeida dos Reis, Leonardo Amaral de Almeida, Oslei Paes Jorge, Jacks Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) is an alternative method to light microscopy (LM). However, few studies have compared the diagnostic agreement between WSI and LM, especially to grade oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variability in grading OED by the World Health Organization grading system, using WSI and conventional LM, and to investigate whether the access to clinical information, and psychologic or physical states of the pathologists could interfere with the diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: eleven experienced pathologists from seven Brazilian universities independently evaluated twenty-five OED cases. The analyses were performed in duplicate for each method, with an interval of at least 30 days, and the time consumed in each analysis was measured. Physical and psychologic states were evaluated by blood pressure levels, heart rate and two questionnaires: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Perceived Stress Scale. Clinical information was provided after the second evaluation using WSI and the pathologist could change their diagnostic decision or not. RESULTS: LM showed a higher inter-examiner agreement (k=0.53) than WSI (k=0.45) and a smaller time consumed by the pathologists (mean of 65.53 seconds compared to 91.02 seconds in WSI). In the first analysis using conventional microscopy, there was a positive correlation between kappa values and anxiety (r=0.47, p=0.02), and stress (r=0.64, p<0.01), and an inverse correlation with heart rate (r=-0.48, p=0.02). In the digital analysis, there was also a positive correlation between kappa values and anxiety (r=0.75, p<0.001). After clinical information was given, there was a slight change in 11.3% of the cases, and a great discrepancy in 1.1% of the cases, mainly increasing the OED grade. CONCLUSIONS: both microscopy systems had similar results, although LM had slightly higher kappa values, and WSI was more time consuming. Key words:Pathology, microscopy, diagnosis, leukoplakia oral, anxiety. Medicina Oral S.L. 2021-01 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7806346/ /pubmed/33247580 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23854 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Diniz, Priscilla Barbosa
Sena-Filho, Marcondes
Graner, Karen Mendes
Mariz, Bruno Augusto Linhares Almeida
dos Reis, Leonardo Amaral
de Almeida, Oslei Paes
Jorge, Jacks
Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study
title Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study
title_full Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study
title_fullStr Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study
title_short Comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study
title_sort comparison of the whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-institutional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7806346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247580
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23854
work_keys_str_mv AT dinizpriscillabarbosa comparisonofthewholeslideimagingandconventionallightmicroscopyinthegradingoforalepithelialdysplasiaamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT senafilhomarcondes comparisonofthewholeslideimagingandconventionallightmicroscopyinthegradingoforalepithelialdysplasiaamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT granerkarenmendes comparisonofthewholeslideimagingandconventionallightmicroscopyinthegradingoforalepithelialdysplasiaamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT marizbrunoaugustolinharesalmeida comparisonofthewholeslideimagingandconventionallightmicroscopyinthegradingoforalepithelialdysplasiaamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT dosreisleonardoamaral comparisonofthewholeslideimagingandconventionallightmicroscopyinthegradingoforalepithelialdysplasiaamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT dealmeidaosleipaes comparisonofthewholeslideimagingandconventionallightmicroscopyinthegradingoforalepithelialdysplasiaamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT jorgejacks comparisonofthewholeslideimagingandconventionallightmicroscopyinthegradingoforalepithelialdysplasiaamultiinstitutionalstudy