Cargando…

Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda

BACKGROUND: This study assessed characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a household-based cross-sectional study among 395 households in Kasubi slum using a semi-structured questionnaire and observational checklist to collect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ssemugabo, Charles, Wafula, Solomon Tsebeni, Ndejjo, Rawlance, Osuret, Jimmy, Musoke, David, Halage, Abdullah Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32236413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa011
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study assessed characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a household-based cross-sectional study among 395 households in Kasubi slum using a semi-structured questionnaire and observational checklist to collect data. RESULTS: Almost 98.0% (387/395) of households owned a sanitation facility and 77.0% (298/387) shared it with other households. The most common type of sanitation facility was a pit latrine with slab (66.9% [259/387]). Most (90.5% [305/337]) latrines had a door or shutter, a roof (92.9% [313/337]) and a depth >1.5 m (68.2% [229/337]). Overall, 21.3% (84/395) and 65.6% (259/395) of households had improved and functional sanitation facilities, respectively. Only 16.5% (65/395) of the households had a hand-washing facility. Student-led (adjusted prevalence rate [PR] 2.67 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83–3.94]) and households that owned their house (adjusted PR 2.17 [95% CI 1.33–3.53]) were 2.67 and 2.17 times more likely to have improved sanitation facilities, respectively. Households that owned their house (adjusted PR 1.90 [95% CI 1.18–3.05]) were 1.9 times more likely to possess a hand-washing facility. CONCLUSIONS: The coverage of improved sanitation and hygiene facilities was low. The majority of households were using a shared pit latrine with a slab that had no hand-washing facility. Sanitation and hygiene interventions should prioritize improving sanitation and hygiene facilities.