Cargando…

Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda

BACKGROUND: This study assessed characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a household-based cross-sectional study among 395 households in Kasubi slum using a semi-structured questionnaire and observational checklist to collect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ssemugabo, Charles, Wafula, Solomon Tsebeni, Ndejjo, Rawlance, Osuret, Jimmy, Musoke, David, Halage, Abdullah Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32236413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa011
_version_ 1783636704448479232
author Ssemugabo, Charles
Wafula, Solomon Tsebeni
Ndejjo, Rawlance
Osuret, Jimmy
Musoke, David
Halage, Abdullah Ali
author_facet Ssemugabo, Charles
Wafula, Solomon Tsebeni
Ndejjo, Rawlance
Osuret, Jimmy
Musoke, David
Halage, Abdullah Ali
author_sort Ssemugabo, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study assessed characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a household-based cross-sectional study among 395 households in Kasubi slum using a semi-structured questionnaire and observational checklist to collect data. RESULTS: Almost 98.0% (387/395) of households owned a sanitation facility and 77.0% (298/387) shared it with other households. The most common type of sanitation facility was a pit latrine with slab (66.9% [259/387]). Most (90.5% [305/337]) latrines had a door or shutter, a roof (92.9% [313/337]) and a depth >1.5 m (68.2% [229/337]). Overall, 21.3% (84/395) and 65.6% (259/395) of households had improved and functional sanitation facilities, respectively. Only 16.5% (65/395) of the households had a hand-washing facility. Student-led (adjusted prevalence rate [PR] 2.67 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83–3.94]) and households that owned their house (adjusted PR 2.17 [95% CI 1.33–3.53]) were 2.67 and 2.17 times more likely to have improved sanitation facilities, respectively. Households that owned their house (adjusted PR 1.90 [95% CI 1.18–3.05]) were 1.9 times more likely to possess a hand-washing facility. CONCLUSIONS: The coverage of improved sanitation and hygiene facilities was low. The majority of households were using a shared pit latrine with a slab that had no hand-washing facility. Sanitation and hygiene interventions should prioritize improving sanitation and hygiene facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78072392021-01-21 Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda Ssemugabo, Charles Wafula, Solomon Tsebeni Ndejjo, Rawlance Osuret, Jimmy Musoke, David Halage, Abdullah Ali Int Health Original Article BACKGROUND: This study assessed characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: We conducted a household-based cross-sectional study among 395 households in Kasubi slum using a semi-structured questionnaire and observational checklist to collect data. RESULTS: Almost 98.0% (387/395) of households owned a sanitation facility and 77.0% (298/387) shared it with other households. The most common type of sanitation facility was a pit latrine with slab (66.9% [259/387]). Most (90.5% [305/337]) latrines had a door or shutter, a roof (92.9% [313/337]) and a depth >1.5 m (68.2% [229/337]). Overall, 21.3% (84/395) and 65.6% (259/395) of households had improved and functional sanitation facilities, respectively. Only 16.5% (65/395) of the households had a hand-washing facility. Student-led (adjusted prevalence rate [PR] 2.67 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83–3.94]) and households that owned their house (adjusted PR 2.17 [95% CI 1.33–3.53]) were 2.67 and 2.17 times more likely to have improved sanitation facilities, respectively. Households that owned their house (adjusted PR 1.90 [95% CI 1.18–3.05]) were 1.9 times more likely to possess a hand-washing facility. CONCLUSIONS: The coverage of improved sanitation and hygiene facilities was low. The majority of households were using a shared pit latrine with a slab that had no hand-washing facility. Sanitation and hygiene interventions should prioritize improving sanitation and hygiene facilities. Oxford University Press 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7807239/ /pubmed/32236413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa011 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Ssemugabo, Charles
Wafula, Solomon Tsebeni
Ndejjo, Rawlance
Osuret, Jimmy
Musoke, David
Halage, Abdullah Ali
Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda
title Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda
title_full Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda
title_fullStr Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda
title_short Characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda
title_sort characteristics of sanitation and hygiene facilities in a slum community in kampala, uganda
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32236413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa011
work_keys_str_mv AT ssemugabocharles characteristicsofsanitationandhygienefacilitiesinaslumcommunityinkampalauganda
AT wafulasolomontsebeni characteristicsofsanitationandhygienefacilitiesinaslumcommunityinkampalauganda
AT ndejjorawlance characteristicsofsanitationandhygienefacilitiesinaslumcommunityinkampalauganda
AT osuretjimmy characteristicsofsanitationandhygienefacilitiesinaslumcommunityinkampalauganda
AT musokedavid characteristicsofsanitationandhygienefacilitiesinaslumcommunityinkampalauganda
AT halageabdullahali characteristicsofsanitationandhygienefacilitiesinaslumcommunityinkampalauganda