Cargando…
Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
As the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, prostate cancer is confirmed via tissue biopsy. Given the large number of prostate biopsies performed each year, the technique should be as accurate and safe as possible for the patient’s well-being. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-b...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457274 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.40 |
_version_ | 1783636719393832960 |
---|---|
author | Thomson, Alice Li, Mo Grummet, Jeremy Sengupta, Shomik |
author_facet | Thomson, Alice Li, Mo Grummet, Jeremy Sengupta, Shomik |
author_sort | Thomson, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, prostate cancer is confirmed via tissue biopsy. Given the large number of prostate biopsies performed each year, the technique should be as accurate and safe as possible for the patient’s well-being. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) is most offered worldwide. Transperineal biopsy (TPP-biopsy), on the other hand, has been gaining popularity due to its superior sensitivity and lower rate of sepsis. This article offers a review of the brachytherapy grid technique used to perform a TPP-biopsy, as well as a discussion of possible variations in the procedure. TPP-biopsy is typically performed under general anaesthesia with patient in lithotomy. Through the perineum, cores of tissue are taken systematically, with or without targeting, under US guidance. Different fusion techniques (cognition, MRI-US fusion software, MRI in-bore) can be used to target pre-identified lesions on MRI. The sampling can be done either by free hand or using a brachytherapy grid. Robotic assisted prostate biopsy is also available on the market as an alternative. In recent years, there has been accumulating evidence showing that it is safe and feasible to perform TPPB under local anaesthesia. This may improve the uptake of TPPB as the preferred biopsy technique for prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7807331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78073312021-01-15 Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique Thomson, Alice Li, Mo Grummet, Jeremy Sengupta, Shomik Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers As the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, prostate cancer is confirmed via tissue biopsy. Given the large number of prostate biopsies performed each year, the technique should be as accurate and safe as possible for the patient’s well-being. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) is most offered worldwide. Transperineal biopsy (TPP-biopsy), on the other hand, has been gaining popularity due to its superior sensitivity and lower rate of sepsis. This article offers a review of the brachytherapy grid technique used to perform a TPP-biopsy, as well as a discussion of possible variations in the procedure. TPP-biopsy is typically performed under general anaesthesia with patient in lithotomy. Through the perineum, cores of tissue are taken systematically, with or without targeting, under US guidance. Different fusion techniques (cognition, MRI-US fusion software, MRI in-bore) can be used to target pre-identified lesions on MRI. The sampling can be done either by free hand or using a brachytherapy grid. Robotic assisted prostate biopsy is also available on the market as an alternative. In recent years, there has been accumulating evidence showing that it is safe and feasible to perform TPPB under local anaesthesia. This may improve the uptake of TPPB as the preferred biopsy technique for prostate cancer. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7807331/ /pubmed/33457274 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.40 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers Thomson, Alice Li, Mo Grummet, Jeremy Sengupta, Shomik Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique |
title | Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique |
title_full | Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique |
title_fullStr | Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique |
title_short | Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique |
title_sort | transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique |
topic | Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457274 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.40 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomsonalice transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique AT limo transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique AT grummetjeremy transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique AT senguptashomik transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique |