Cargando…

Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique

As the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, prostate cancer is confirmed via tissue biopsy. Given the large number of prostate biopsies performed each year, the technique should be as accurate and safe as possible for the patient’s well-being. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Alice, Li, Mo, Grummet, Jeremy, Sengupta, Shomik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457274
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.40
_version_ 1783636719393832960
author Thomson, Alice
Li, Mo
Grummet, Jeremy
Sengupta, Shomik
author_facet Thomson, Alice
Li, Mo
Grummet, Jeremy
Sengupta, Shomik
author_sort Thomson, Alice
collection PubMed
description As the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, prostate cancer is confirmed via tissue biopsy. Given the large number of prostate biopsies performed each year, the technique should be as accurate and safe as possible for the patient’s well-being. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) is most offered worldwide. Transperineal biopsy (TPP-biopsy), on the other hand, has been gaining popularity due to its superior sensitivity and lower rate of sepsis. This article offers a review of the brachytherapy grid technique used to perform a TPP-biopsy, as well as a discussion of possible variations in the procedure. TPP-biopsy is typically performed under general anaesthesia with patient in lithotomy. Through the perineum, cores of tissue are taken systematically, with or without targeting, under US guidance. Different fusion techniques (cognition, MRI-US fusion software, MRI in-bore) can be used to target pre-identified lesions on MRI. The sampling can be done either by free hand or using a brachytherapy grid. Robotic assisted prostate biopsy is also available on the market as an alternative. In recent years, there has been accumulating evidence showing that it is safe and feasible to perform TPPB under local anaesthesia. This may improve the uptake of TPPB as the preferred biopsy technique for prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78073312021-01-15 Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique Thomson, Alice Li, Mo Grummet, Jeremy Sengupta, Shomik Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers As the second most diagnosed cancer worldwide, prostate cancer is confirmed via tissue biopsy. Given the large number of prostate biopsies performed each year, the technique should be as accurate and safe as possible for the patient’s well-being. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) is most offered worldwide. Transperineal biopsy (TPP-biopsy), on the other hand, has been gaining popularity due to its superior sensitivity and lower rate of sepsis. This article offers a review of the brachytherapy grid technique used to perform a TPP-biopsy, as well as a discussion of possible variations in the procedure. TPP-biopsy is typically performed under general anaesthesia with patient in lithotomy. Through the perineum, cores of tissue are taken systematically, with or without targeting, under US guidance. Different fusion techniques (cognition, MRI-US fusion software, MRI in-bore) can be used to target pre-identified lesions on MRI. The sampling can be done either by free hand or using a brachytherapy grid. Robotic assisted prostate biopsy is also available on the market as an alternative. In recent years, there has been accumulating evidence showing that it is safe and feasible to perform TPPB under local anaesthesia. This may improve the uptake of TPPB as the preferred biopsy technique for prostate cancer. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7807331/ /pubmed/33457274 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.40 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers
Thomson, Alice
Li, Mo
Grummet, Jeremy
Sengupta, Shomik
Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
title Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
title_full Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
title_fullStr Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
title_full_unstemmed Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
title_short Transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
title_sort transperineal prostate biopsy: a review of technique
topic Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457274
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.40
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonalice transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique
AT limo transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique
AT grummetjeremy transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique
AT senguptashomik transperinealprostatebiopsyareviewoftechnique