Cargando…

Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?

The full optimal extent of a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at time of radical cystectomy (RC) has not yet been determined. The diagnostic role of LND is clear and is extremely important for identifying those who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. While retrospective analyses have demonstrated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clinton, Timothy N., Huang, Chun, Goh, Alvin C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457268
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-406
_version_ 1783636724956528640
author Clinton, Timothy N.
Huang, Chun
Goh, Alvin C.
author_facet Clinton, Timothy N.
Huang, Chun
Goh, Alvin C.
author_sort Clinton, Timothy N.
collection PubMed
description The full optimal extent of a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at time of radical cystectomy (RC) has not yet been determined. The diagnostic role of LND is clear and is extremely important for identifying those who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. While retrospective analyses have demonstrated improved survival when the number of lymph nodes is increased and extended LNDs (eLNDs) are performed, these results have yet to be borne out in prospective randomized phase III trials. The recently published LEA AUO AB 25/02 trial is a promising attempt to determine the efficacy of eLND, but unfortunately falls short because of its limited design and therefore, did not demonstrate an improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS). In an era of increased utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) providing survival benefit, the ability to demonstrate improved survival with eLND is even more challenging. Currently, we are awaiting the results of SWOG S1011, expectations of achieving a positive trial with improved RFS remains unlikely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78073542021-01-15 Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Clinton, Timothy N. Huang, Chun Goh, Alvin C. Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer The full optimal extent of a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at time of radical cystectomy (RC) has not yet been determined. The diagnostic role of LND is clear and is extremely important for identifying those who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. While retrospective analyses have demonstrated improved survival when the number of lymph nodes is increased and extended LNDs (eLNDs) are performed, these results have yet to be borne out in prospective randomized phase III trials. The recently published LEA AUO AB 25/02 trial is a promising attempt to determine the efficacy of eLND, but unfortunately falls short because of its limited design and therefore, did not demonstrate an improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS). In an era of increased utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) providing survival benefit, the ability to demonstrate improved survival with eLND is even more challenging. Currently, we are awaiting the results of SWOG S1011, expectations of achieving a positive trial with improved RFS remains unlikely. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7807354/ /pubmed/33457268 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-406 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Clinton, Timothy N.
Huang, Chun
Goh, Alvin C.
Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
title Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
title_full Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
title_fullStr Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
title_short Is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
title_sort is there an oncological benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer?
topic Review Article on Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457268
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-406
work_keys_str_mv AT clintontimothyn isthereanoncologicalbenefittoextendedlymphadenectomyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT huangchun isthereanoncologicalbenefittoextendedlymphadenectomyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer
AT gohalvinc isthereanoncologicalbenefittoextendedlymphadenectomyformuscleinvasivebladdercancer