Cargando…
A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important component in the staging and prognostication of prostate cancer. We performed a narrative review to assess the literature surrounding PLND: (I) the current guideline recommendations and contemporary utilization, (II) the calculation of patient-spec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457278 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-729 |
_version_ | 1783636725629714432 |
---|---|
author | Cheung, Douglas C. Fleshner, Neil Sengupta, Shomik Woon, Dixon |
author_facet | Cheung, Douglas C. Fleshner, Neil Sengupta, Shomik Woon, Dixon |
author_sort | Cheung, Douglas C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important component in the staging and prognostication of prostate cancer. We performed a narrative review to assess the literature surrounding PLND: (I) the current guideline recommendations and contemporary utilization, (II) the calculation of patient-specific risk to perform PLND using available nomograms, (III) to review the extent of dissection, and its associated outcomes and complications. Due to the improved lymph node yield, better staging, and theoretical improvement in the control of micro-metastatic disease, guidelines have supported the use of (extended-) PLND in patients deemed to be at intermediate or high risk of lymph node involvement (often at a threshold of 5% on modern risk nomograms). However, in practice, real-world utilization of PLND varies considerably due to multiple reasons. Conflicting evidence persists with no clear oncological benefit to PLND, and a small, but important, risk of morbidity. Complications are rare, but include lymphoceles; thromboembolic events; and more rarely, obturator nerve, vascular, and ureteric injury. Furthermore, changing disease incidence and stage migration in the context of earlier detection overall have led to a decreased risk of nodal disease. The trade-offs between the benefits, harms, and risk tolerance/threshold must be carefully considered between each patient and their clinician. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7807357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78073572021-01-15 A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer Cheung, Douglas C. Fleshner, Neil Sengupta, Shomik Woon, Dixon Transl Androl Urol Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is an important component in the staging and prognostication of prostate cancer. We performed a narrative review to assess the literature surrounding PLND: (I) the current guideline recommendations and contemporary utilization, (II) the calculation of patient-specific risk to perform PLND using available nomograms, (III) to review the extent of dissection, and its associated outcomes and complications. Due to the improved lymph node yield, better staging, and theoretical improvement in the control of micro-metastatic disease, guidelines have supported the use of (extended-) PLND in patients deemed to be at intermediate or high risk of lymph node involvement (often at a threshold of 5% on modern risk nomograms). However, in practice, real-world utilization of PLND varies considerably due to multiple reasons. Conflicting evidence persists with no clear oncological benefit to PLND, and a small, but important, risk of morbidity. Complications are rare, but include lymphoceles; thromboembolic events; and more rarely, obturator nerve, vascular, and ureteric injury. Furthermore, changing disease incidence and stage migration in the context of earlier detection overall have led to a decreased risk of nodal disease. The trade-offs between the benefits, harms, and risk tolerance/threshold must be carefully considered between each patient and their clinician. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7807357/ /pubmed/33457278 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-729 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers Cheung, Douglas C. Fleshner, Neil Sengupta, Shomik Woon, Dixon A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
title | A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
title_full | A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
title_short | A narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
title_sort | narrative review of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer |
topic | Review Article on Surgery for Urologic Cancers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457278 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheungdouglasc anarrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer AT fleshnerneil anarrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer AT senguptashomik anarrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer AT woondixon anarrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer AT cheungdouglasc narrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer AT fleshnerneil narrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer AT senguptashomik narrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer AT woondixon narrativereviewofpelviclymphnodedissectioninprostatecancer |