Cargando…

Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential

Idiopathic infertility is the most common individual diagnosis in male infertility, representing nearly 44% of cases. Research studies dating over the last half-century consistently demonstrate a decline in male fertility that is incompletely explained by obesity, known genetic causes, or diet and l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krzastek, Sarah C., Farhi, Jack, Gray, Marisa, Smith, Ryan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457251
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-685
_version_ 1783636729109938176
author Krzastek, Sarah C.
Farhi, Jack
Gray, Marisa
Smith, Ryan P.
author_facet Krzastek, Sarah C.
Farhi, Jack
Gray, Marisa
Smith, Ryan P.
author_sort Krzastek, Sarah C.
collection PubMed
description Idiopathic infertility is the most common individual diagnosis in male infertility, representing nearly 44% of cases. Research studies dating over the last half-century consistently demonstrate a decline in male fertility that is incompletely explained by obesity, known genetic causes, or diet and lifestyle changes alone. Human exposures have changed dramatically over the same time course as this fertility decline. Synthetic chemicals surround us. Some are benevolent; however, many are known to cause disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and impair spermatogenesis. More than 80,000 chemicals are registered with the United States National Toxicology Program and nearly 2,000 new chemicals are introduced each year. Many of these are known toxins, such as phthalates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic amines, and organophosphate esters, and have been banned or significantly restricted by other countries as they carry known carcinogenic effects and are reproductively toxic. In the United States, many of these chemicals are still permissible in exposure levels known to cause reproductive harm. This contrasts to other chemical regulatory legislature, such as the European Union’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) regulations which are more comprehensive and restrictive. Quantification of these diverse exposures on an individual level has proven challenging, although forthcoming technologies may soon make this data available to consumers. Establishing causality and the proportion of idiopathic infertility attributable to environmental toxin exposures remains elusive, however, continued investigation, avoidance of exposure, and mitigation of risk is essential to our reproductive health. The aim of this review is to examine the literature linking changes in male fertility to some of the most common environmental exposures. Specifically, pesticides and herbicides such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dibromochloropropane (DBCP), organophosphates and atrazine, endocrine disrupting compounds including plastic compounds phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA), heavy metals, natural gas/oil, non-ionizing radiation, air and noise pollution, lifestyle factors including diet, obesity, caffeine use, smoking, alcohol and drug use, as well as commonly prescribed medications will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78073712021-01-15 Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential Krzastek, Sarah C. Farhi, Jack Gray, Marisa Smith, Ryan P. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Idiopathic infertility is the most common individual diagnosis in male infertility, representing nearly 44% of cases. Research studies dating over the last half-century consistently demonstrate a decline in male fertility that is incompletely explained by obesity, known genetic causes, or diet and lifestyle changes alone. Human exposures have changed dramatically over the same time course as this fertility decline. Synthetic chemicals surround us. Some are benevolent; however, many are known to cause disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and impair spermatogenesis. More than 80,000 chemicals are registered with the United States National Toxicology Program and nearly 2,000 new chemicals are introduced each year. Many of these are known toxins, such as phthalates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aromatic amines, and organophosphate esters, and have been banned or significantly restricted by other countries as they carry known carcinogenic effects and are reproductively toxic. In the United States, many of these chemicals are still permissible in exposure levels known to cause reproductive harm. This contrasts to other chemical regulatory legislature, such as the European Union’s REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) regulations which are more comprehensive and restrictive. Quantification of these diverse exposures on an individual level has proven challenging, although forthcoming technologies may soon make this data available to consumers. Establishing causality and the proportion of idiopathic infertility attributable to environmental toxin exposures remains elusive, however, continued investigation, avoidance of exposure, and mitigation of risk is essential to our reproductive health. The aim of this review is to examine the literature linking changes in male fertility to some of the most common environmental exposures. Specifically, pesticides and herbicides such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dibromochloropropane (DBCP), organophosphates and atrazine, endocrine disrupting compounds including plastic compounds phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA), heavy metals, natural gas/oil, non-ionizing radiation, air and noise pollution, lifestyle factors including diet, obesity, caffeine use, smoking, alcohol and drug use, as well as commonly prescribed medications will be discussed. AME Publishing Company 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7807371/ /pubmed/33457251 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-685 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Krzastek, Sarah C.
Farhi, Jack
Gray, Marisa
Smith, Ryan P.
Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential
title Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential
title_full Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential
title_fullStr Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential
title_full_unstemmed Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential
title_short Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential
title_sort impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457251
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-685
work_keys_str_mv AT krzasteksarahc impactofenvironmentaltoxinexposureonmalefertilitypotential
AT farhijack impactofenvironmentaltoxinexposureonmalefertilitypotential
AT graymarisa impactofenvironmentaltoxinexposureonmalefertilitypotential
AT smithryanp impactofenvironmentaltoxinexposureonmalefertilitypotential