Cargando…

Predicting Air Superficial Velocity of Two-Phase Reactors Using ANFIS and CFD

[Image: see text] In predicting the turbulence property of gas (bubble) flow in the domain of continuous fluid and liquid, the integration of machine learning and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods reduces the overall computational time. This combination enables us to see the effective input...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babanezhad, Meisam, Rezakazemi, Mashallah, Marjani, Azam, Shirazian, Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04386
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] In predicting the turbulence property of gas (bubble) flow in the domain of continuous fluid and liquid, the integration of machine learning and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods reduces the overall computational time. This combination enables us to see the effective input parameters in the engineering process and the impact of operating conditions on final outputs, such as gas hold-up, heat and mass transfer, and the flow regime (uniform bubble distribution or nonuniform bubble properties). This paper uses the combination of machine learning and single-size calculation of the Eulerian method to estimate the gas flow distribution in the continuous liquid fluid. To present the machine-learning method besides the Eulerian method, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is used to train the CFD finding and then estimate the flow based on the machine-learning method. The gas velocity and turbulent eddy dissipation rate are trained throughout the bubble column reactor (BCR) for each CFD node, and the artificial BCR is predicted by the ANFIS method. This smart reactor can represent the artificial CFD of the BCR, resulting in the reduction of expensive numerical simulations. The results showed that the number of inputs could significantly change this method’s accuracy, representing the intelligence of method in the learning data set. Additionally, the membership function specifications can impact the accuracy, particularly, when the process is trained with different inputs. The turbulent eddy dissipation rate can also be predicted by the ANFIS method with a similar model pattern for air superficial gas velocity.