Cargando…
Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes
BACKGROUND: Impacts of biotic stressors, such as consumers, on coral microbiomes have gained attention as corals decline worldwide. Corallivore feeding can alter coral microbiomes in ways that contribute to dysbiosis, but feeding strategies are diverse – complicating generalizations about the nature...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00061-5 |
_version_ | 1783636753854234624 |
---|---|
author | Clements, Cody S. Burns, Andrew S. Stewart, Frank J. Hay, Mark E. |
author_facet | Clements, Cody S. Burns, Andrew S. Stewart, Frank J. Hay, Mark E. |
author_sort | Clements, Cody S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Impacts of biotic stressors, such as consumers, on coral microbiomes have gained attention as corals decline worldwide. Corallivore feeding can alter coral microbiomes in ways that contribute to dysbiosis, but feeding strategies are diverse – complicating generalizations about the nature of consumer impacts on coral microbiomes. RESULTS: In field experiments, feeding by Coralliophila violacea, a parasitic snail that suppresses coral growth, altered the microbiome of its host, Porites cylindrica, but these impacts were spatially constrained. Alterations in microbial community composition and variability were largely restricted to snail feeding scars; basal or distal areas ~ 1.5 cm or 6–8 cm away, respectively, were largely unaltered. Feeding scars were enriched in taxa common to stressed corals (e.g. Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae) and depauperate in putative beneficial symbionts (e.g. Endozoicomonadaceae) compared to locations that lacked feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies that assessed consumer impacts on coral microbiomes suggested that feeding disrupts microbial communities, potentially leading to dysbiosis, but those studies involved mobile corallivores that move across and among numerous individual hosts. Sedentary parasites like C. violacea that spend long intervals with individual hosts and are dependent on hosts for food and shelter may minimize damage to host microbiomes to assure continued host health and thus exploitation. More mobile consumers that forage across numerous hosts should not experience these constraints. Thus, stability or disruption of microbiomes on attacked corals may vary based on the foraging strategy of coral consumers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s42523-020-00061-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7807496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78074962021-01-19 Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes Clements, Cody S. Burns, Andrew S. Stewart, Frank J. Hay, Mark E. Anim Microbiome Research Article BACKGROUND: Impacts of biotic stressors, such as consumers, on coral microbiomes have gained attention as corals decline worldwide. Corallivore feeding can alter coral microbiomes in ways that contribute to dysbiosis, but feeding strategies are diverse – complicating generalizations about the nature of consumer impacts on coral microbiomes. RESULTS: In field experiments, feeding by Coralliophila violacea, a parasitic snail that suppresses coral growth, altered the microbiome of its host, Porites cylindrica, but these impacts were spatially constrained. Alterations in microbial community composition and variability were largely restricted to snail feeding scars; basal or distal areas ~ 1.5 cm or 6–8 cm away, respectively, were largely unaltered. Feeding scars were enriched in taxa common to stressed corals (e.g. Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae) and depauperate in putative beneficial symbionts (e.g. Endozoicomonadaceae) compared to locations that lacked feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies that assessed consumer impacts on coral microbiomes suggested that feeding disrupts microbial communities, potentially leading to dysbiosis, but those studies involved mobile corallivores that move across and among numerous individual hosts. Sedentary parasites like C. violacea that spend long intervals with individual hosts and are dependent on hosts for food and shelter may minimize damage to host microbiomes to assure continued host health and thus exploitation. More mobile consumers that forage across numerous hosts should not experience these constraints. Thus, stability or disruption of microbiomes on attacked corals may vary based on the foraging strategy of coral consumers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s42523-020-00061-5. BioMed Central 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7807496/ /pubmed/33499998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00061-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Clements, Cody S. Burns, Andrew S. Stewart, Frank J. Hay, Mark E. Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes |
title | Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes |
title_full | Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes |
title_fullStr | Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes |
title_short | Parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes |
title_sort | parasite-host ecology: the limited impacts of an intimate enemy on host microbiomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33499998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-020-00061-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clementscodys parasitehostecologythelimitedimpactsofanintimateenemyonhostmicrobiomes AT burnsandrews parasitehostecologythelimitedimpactsofanintimateenemyonhostmicrobiomes AT stewartfrankj parasitehostecologythelimitedimpactsofanintimateenemyonhostmicrobiomes AT haymarke parasitehostecologythelimitedimpactsofanintimateenemyonhostmicrobiomes |