Cargando…

Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiopacifiers are introduced to bone cements to provide the appearance of bone in kilovoltage (kV) radiographic images. For higher energy megavoltage (MV) radiotherapy treatment beams, however, these radiopacifiers do not cause a bone-like perturbation of dose. This study th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crowe, Scott B., Bennett, Jane, Lathouras, Marika, Lancaster, Craig M., Sylvander, Steven R., Chua, Benjamin, Bettington, Catherine S., Lin, Charles Y., Kairn, Tanya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.04.004
_version_ 1783636760236916736
author Crowe, Scott B.
Bennett, Jane
Lathouras, Marika
Lancaster, Craig M.
Sylvander, Steven R.
Chua, Benjamin
Bettington, Catherine S.
Lin, Charles Y.
Kairn, Tanya
author_facet Crowe, Scott B.
Bennett, Jane
Lathouras, Marika
Lancaster, Craig M.
Sylvander, Steven R.
Chua, Benjamin
Bettington, Catherine S.
Lin, Charles Y.
Kairn, Tanya
author_sort Crowe, Scott B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiopacifiers are introduced to bone cements to provide the appearance of bone in kilovoltage (kV) radiographic images. For higher energy megavoltage (MV) radiotherapy treatment beams, however, these radiopacifiers do not cause a bone-like perturbation of dose. This study therefore aimed to determine the impact of the barium-contrasted plastic-based cement materials on radiotherapy dose calculations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiological properties of a physical sample of bone cement were characterised by computed tomography (CT) imaging and transmission measurements. Monte Carlo simulations of percentage depth-dose profiles were performed to determine the possible dose error for MV treatment beams. Dose differences were then investigated for clinical volumetric modulated radiotherapy treatment plans, with and without density overrides applied. RESULTS: Differences of up to 7% were observed at the downstream interface of a 0.6 cm thick bone cement layer, compared to bone. Differences in planning target volume dose-volume metrics varied between −0.5% and 2.0%. CONCLUSION: Before planning radiotherapy treatments for patients who have undergone cranioplasty, every effort should be made to identify whether a radiopacified bone cement has been implanted. Density overrides should be applied to minimise dose calculation errors, whenever bone cement is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78075302021-01-14 Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation Crowe, Scott B. Bennett, Jane Lathouras, Marika Lancaster, Craig M. Sylvander, Steven R. Chua, Benjamin Bettington, Catherine S. Lin, Charles Y. Kairn, Tanya Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiopacifiers are introduced to bone cements to provide the appearance of bone in kilovoltage (kV) radiographic images. For higher energy megavoltage (MV) radiotherapy treatment beams, however, these radiopacifiers do not cause a bone-like perturbation of dose. This study therefore aimed to determine the impact of the barium-contrasted plastic-based cement materials on radiotherapy dose calculations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiological properties of a physical sample of bone cement were characterised by computed tomography (CT) imaging and transmission measurements. Monte Carlo simulations of percentage depth-dose profiles were performed to determine the possible dose error for MV treatment beams. Dose differences were then investigated for clinical volumetric modulated radiotherapy treatment plans, with and without density overrides applied. RESULTS: Differences of up to 7% were observed at the downstream interface of a 0.6 cm thick bone cement layer, compared to bone. Differences in planning target volume dose-volume metrics varied between −0.5% and 2.0%. CONCLUSION: Before planning radiotherapy treatments for patients who have undergone cranioplasty, every effort should be made to identify whether a radiopacified bone cement has been implanted. Density overrides should be applied to minimise dose calculation errors, whenever bone cement is used. Elsevier 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7807530/ /pubmed/33458308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.04.004 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Crowe, Scott B.
Bennett, Jane
Lathouras, Marika
Lancaster, Craig M.
Sylvander, Steven R.
Chua, Benjamin
Bettington, Catherine S.
Lin, Charles Y.
Kairn, Tanya
Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation
title Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation
title_full Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation
title_fullStr Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation
title_full_unstemmed Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation
title_short Impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation
title_sort impact of radiopacified bone cement on radiotherapy dose calculation
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT crowescottb impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT bennettjane impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT lathourasmarika impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT lancastercraigm impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT sylvanderstevenr impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT chuabenjamin impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT bettingtoncatherines impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT lincharlesy impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation
AT kairntanya impactofradiopacifiedbonecementonradiotherapydosecalculation