Cargando…

Stereotactic radiotherapy boost after definite chemoradiation for non-responding locally advanced NSCLC based on early response monitoring (18)F-FDG-PET/CT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer remains poor despite chemoradiation. This planning study evaluated a stereotactic boost after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (30 × 2 Gy) to improve local control. The maximum achievable boost directed to radioresistant pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meijer, Tineke W.H., Wijsman, Robin, Usmanij, Edwin A., Schuurbiers, Olga C.J., Kollenburg, Peter van, Bouwmans, Liza, Bussink, Johan, Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee de
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.08.003
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer remains poor despite chemoradiation. This planning study evaluated a stereotactic boost after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (30 × 2 Gy) to improve local control. The maximum achievable boost directed to radioresistant primary tumor subvolumes based on pre-treatment fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) (pre-treatment-PET) and on early response monitoring (18)F-FDG-PET/CT (ERM-PET) was compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For ten patients, a stereotactic boost (VMAT) was planned on ERM-PET (PTV(boost;ERM)) and on pre-treatment-PET (PTV(boost;pre-treatment)), using a 70% SUV(max) threshold with 7 mm margin to segmentate radioresistant subvolumes. Dose was escalated till organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met, aiming to plan at least 18 Gy in 3 fractions (EQD(2) 84 Gy/BED 100.8 Gy). RESULTS: In five patients, PTV(boost;ERM) was 9–40% smaller relative to PTV(boost;pre-treatment). Overlap of PTV(boost;ERM) with OARs decreased also compared to overlap of PTV(boost;pre-treatment) with OARs. However, any overlap with OAR remained in 4/5 patients resulting in minimal differences between planned dose before and during treatment. Median dose (EQD(2)) covering 99% and 95% of PTV(boost;ERM) were 15 Gy and 18 Gy respectively. Median boost volume receiving a physical dose of  ≥ 18 Gy (V18) was 88%. V18 was ≥ 80% for PTV(boost) in six patients. CONCLUSIONS: A significant stereotactic boost to volumes with high initial or persistent (18)F-FDG-uptake could be planned above 60 Gy chemoradiation. Differences between planned dose before and during treatment were minimal. However, as an ERM-PET also monitors changes in tumor position, we recommend to plan the boost on the ERM-PET.