Cargando…

Evaluating the repeatability and set-up sensitivity of a large field of view distortion phantom and software for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy requires geometrically accurate MR images over the full scanner Field of View (FoV). This study aimed to investigate the repeatability of distortion measurements made using a commercial large FoV phantom and analysis software and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wyatt, Jonathan, Hedley, Stephen, Johnstone, Emily, Speight, Richard, Kelly, Charles, Henry, Ann, Short, Susan, Murray, Louise, Sebag-Montefiore, David, McCallum, Hazel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.005
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy requires geometrically accurate MR images over the full scanner Field of View (FoV). This study aimed to investigate the repeatability of distortion measurements made using a commercial large FoV phantom and analysis software and the sensitivity of these measurements to small set-up errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Geometric distortion was measured using a commercial phantom and software with 2D and 3D acquisition sequences on three different MR scanners. Two sets of repeatability measurements were made: three scans acquired without moving the phantom between scans (single set-up) and five scans acquired with the phantom re-set up in between each scan (repeated set-up). The set-up sensitivity was assessed by scanning the phantom with an intentional 1 mm lateral offset and independently an intentional 1° rotation. RESULTS: The mean standard deviation of distortion for all phantom markers for the repeated set-up scans was [Formula: see text] for all scanners and sequences. For the [Formula: see text] lateral offset scan [Formula: see text] of the markers agreed within two standard deviations of the mean of the repeated set-up scan (median of all scanners and sequences, range 78%–93%). For the 1° rotation scan, 80% of markers agreed within two standard deviations of the mean (range 69%–93%). CONCLUSIONS: Geometric distortion measurements using a commercial phantom and associated software appear repeatable, although with some sensitivity to set-up errors. This suggests the phantom and software are appropriate for commissioning a MR-only radiotherapy workflow.