Cargando…

Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging technique for treating oligometastases, but limited data is available on what plan quality is achievable for a range of modalities and clinical sites. METHODS: SBRT plans for lung, spine, bone, adrenal, liver and node sites...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jonny, Dean, Christopher, Patel, Rushil, Webster, Gareth, Eaton, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.08.002
_version_ 1783636763984527360
author Lee, Jonny
Dean, Christopher
Patel, Rushil
Webster, Gareth
Eaton, David J.
author_facet Lee, Jonny
Dean, Christopher
Patel, Rushil
Webster, Gareth
Eaton, David J.
author_sort Lee, Jonny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging technique for treating oligometastases, but limited data is available on what plan quality is achievable for a range of modalities and clinical sites. METHODS: SBRT plans for lung, spine, bone, adrenal, liver and node sites from 17 participating centers were reviewed. Centers used various delivery techniques including static and rotational intensity-modulation and multiple non-coplanar beams. Plans were split into lung and other body sites and evaluated with different plan quality metrics, including two which are independent of target coverage; “prescription dose spillage” (PDS) and “modified gradient index” (MGI). These were compared to constraints from the ROSEL and RTOG 0813 clinical trials. RESULTS: Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was compromised (PTV V100% < 90%) in 29% of patient plans in order to meet organ-at-risk (OAR) tolerances, supporting the use of plan quality metrics which are independent of target coverage. Both lung (n = 48) and other body (n = 99) site PDS values agreed well with ROSEL constraints on dose spillage, but RTOG 0813 values were too high to detect sub-optimal plans. MGI values for lung plans were mis-matched to both sets of previous constraints, with ROSEL values too high and RTOG 0813 values too low. MGI values were lower for other body plans as expected, though this was only statistically significant for PTV volumes <20 cm(3). CONCLUSIONS: Updated guidance for lung and other body site SBRT plan quality using the PDS and MGI metrics is presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7807546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78075462021-01-14 Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy Lee, Jonny Dean, Christopher Patel, Rushil Webster, Gareth Eaton, David J. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging technique for treating oligometastases, but limited data is available on what plan quality is achievable for a range of modalities and clinical sites. METHODS: SBRT plans for lung, spine, bone, adrenal, liver and node sites from 17 participating centers were reviewed. Centers used various delivery techniques including static and rotational intensity-modulation and multiple non-coplanar beams. Plans were split into lung and other body sites and evaluated with different plan quality metrics, including two which are independent of target coverage; “prescription dose spillage” (PDS) and “modified gradient index” (MGI). These were compared to constraints from the ROSEL and RTOG 0813 clinical trials. RESULTS: Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was compromised (PTV V100% < 90%) in 29% of patient plans in order to meet organ-at-risk (OAR) tolerances, supporting the use of plan quality metrics which are independent of target coverage. Both lung (n = 48) and other body (n = 99) site PDS values agreed well with ROSEL constraints on dose spillage, but RTOG 0813 values were too high to detect sub-optimal plans. MGI values for lung plans were mis-matched to both sets of previous constraints, with ROSEL values too high and RTOG 0813 values too low. MGI values were lower for other body plans as expected, though this was only statistically significant for PTV volumes <20 cm(3). CONCLUSIONS: Updated guidance for lung and other body site SBRT plan quality using the PDS and MGI metrics is presented. Elsevier 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7807546/ /pubmed/33458276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.08.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lee, Jonny
Dean, Christopher
Patel, Rushil
Webster, Gareth
Eaton, David J.
Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy
title Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy
title_full Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy
title_fullStr Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy
title_short Multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy
title_sort multi-center evaluation of dose conformity in stereotactic body radiotherapy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33458276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2019.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT leejonny multicenterevaluationofdoseconformityinstereotacticbodyradiotherapy
AT deanchristopher multicenterevaluationofdoseconformityinstereotacticbodyradiotherapy
AT patelrushil multicenterevaluationofdoseconformityinstereotacticbodyradiotherapy
AT webstergareth multicenterevaluationofdoseconformityinstereotacticbodyradiotherapy
AT eatondavidj multicenterevaluationofdoseconformityinstereotacticbodyradiotherapy